This means that the only way that the actual supply of tokens could have changed is that they released tokens which were locked for the team or partners.
The icobench page states that there was 350'000 tokens initially for sale. According to your math, it would mean that currently there is 2,23 times more tokens than initially. Thus the market cap at constant price now and then should be also 2,23 bigger.
But when I take a look at coinmarketcap data, i get this:
May 12 2018
Marketcap:3,235 million
price: 0.0174
Jue 27 2019
Marketcap 12 million
Price 0.01737
Market cap has increases 3,7 times. So it does not fit the supply calculation increase.
The Telegeram is useless, I tried to bring this matter to attention several times. Only answer I get is from people who are calling for 10$ price and does not care about anything.
Maybe i should try to tweet them.
Let me try to explain... Writing on the basis of Docademic's
whitepaper.
Total Docademic Supply Was 1,000,000,000 (1 Billion)
35% (350,000,000 MTC) Offered to the public
30% (300,000,000 MTC) Ecosystem
20% (200,000,000 MTC) Management / Team / Shareholders
15% (150,000,000 MTC) Strategic Partners
According to the whitepaper the team must hodl for 1 year, the tokens they got were locked.
The Lockup Period for team tokens is one year with a “Cliff” during the year.
And their strategic partners also hodl the tokens for long term by contract agreement. I assumed the contract was for 1 year also as like the team.
Any Strategic partner that receives tokens must hold long term by contract agreement.
So according to
ICObench, the ICO has ended on 15th April 2018.
The current date is 8th July 2019, so if we notice that the one year period of lock time has ended and team's/partner's token added up to the total supply, most probably.
Now if you calculate 35% public tokens + 35% team/partner's tokens then it will be 70% of the total supply.
They burned about 21.67% (216,714,979 MTC) and now add the fraction percentage of about 8.33% with 70%... that's the total supply now.
I hope that makes sense... if not then please read the whitepaper.
So far I have seen Charles (CEO) be very transparent and that's a good thing for the global rise imo.
He's working non-stop afaik from social channels and I hope that by this year we will get some solidly good news. Such as Lifechain, new exchanges, marketing campaigns and much more.