6. Using feedback as a weapon, Ratimov clearly shows how far he is from understanding the foundations of the trust system.Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist.
The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it?
I got the same impression. The
feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either:
this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:
When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it.
(~~~)
As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust.
That would be very obvious Trust abuse.
(~~~)
You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them.
To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted,
this shouldn't be allowed (see
my reasons why).
Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:
I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another "
brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links.
I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts?