Hi,
I really wanted to post this in the services forum but as a newbie I cannot
.
I don't really like the idea of standing up and declaiming like this but I find some of the talk concerning Pirate and his investment fund to be objectionable. What do I find objectionable?
I find the threats or at (least suggestions) of violence to be objectionable. Not only do I believe these threats to be illegal, I also consider them immoral. Likewise the suggestions of involving his family in the retribution I find *doubly* objectionable. For those of you who consider violence to be acceptable, please consider that you may be harming the reputation of bitcoin itself, potentially hitting us *all* in the pocketbook with your careless talking.
This is what I think should happen now. Pirate should surrender his books (and perhaps the assets of his business fund) to a third party. The third party can examine the books to make sure that there was no Ponzi scheme or other unsavoury business practices. If all that Pirate did was fly too close to the sun through risky dealings then, I'm sorry to say, the investors will have to suck it up. Both you and Pirate took risks. He made risky transactions; *the investors* made a risky investment decision. Hopefully both parties will have learned a valuable lesson, and the investors will need to forgive, as hard as that may be. OTO, if BTCE turns out to be a Ponzi scheme (or something like it) then the only appropriate response would be legal proceedings and If its not possible to press charges or sue over bitcoin dealings then, you'll just just have to resort to public shaming.