Author

Topic: My trust. (Read 1079 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
My username was chosen by my nephew.
September 26, 2015, 03:12:27 PM
#11
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
September 26, 2015, 10:39:56 AM
#10
Is the drama over yet folks?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
September 26, 2015, 08:23:16 AM
#9
* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.


*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here.

I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored.

Thanks, I have passed that post.



Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf.

Thanks Wink.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1112
September 26, 2015, 08:22:46 AM
#8
* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.


*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

Yep, I suppose so - a bit of a niche case though. I'm fairly certain Blazr hasn't been hacked, too Wink

Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
September 26, 2015, 08:20:38 AM
#7
* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.


*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here.

I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
September 26, 2015, 08:17:02 AM
#6
* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.


*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1112
September 26, 2015, 08:02:17 AM
#5
* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
September 26, 2015, 04:49:01 AM
#4
Looks like people keep requesting more drama and doing so in the wrong section. Have you even read the rules of the forum at all?
Quote
19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse).
In other words, I can leave you any rating that I want for any reason that I want. Trust is only moderated in very rare cases (e.g. hacks, a lot of abuse from a single person, etc.). In other words, there is no point in making this thread.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 336
September 26, 2015, 01:23:11 AM
#3
Sorry for clickbait.  Roll Eyes lol well Quickseller's alt just gave me red trust because he's a dickhead who has low self-esteem. He linked an invalid scam report. Can someone explain why I am still marked a scammer when I am in fact not one at all?

Trust is not moderated, due to certain implications.. So in a sense all trust is "allowed".
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
September 26, 2015, 12:05:07 AM
#2
lol, blazr is not my alt. You are a scammer, and the more you post the more certain I am that you are candystripes Wink
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
My username was chosen by my nephew.
September 25, 2015, 11:19:04 PM
#1
Resolved, thank you for understanding.
Jump to: