Topic: N/A (Read 85 times)

The funding progress status bar on our website does not only reflect the ZPHR Governance Token sale but also other means of funding, this is where the discrepancy between the 5,300$ and the 0.42 BNB comes in. We wanted to raise funds in a way that would allow us to give early investors a chance in shaping the Zephyr project. This is why we launched the ZPHR Governance Token and the entire Layer 1 governance scheme: Token holders will be able to shape our Layer 1 on a continuous basis, deciding on critical items such as Minting Bucket limits and Emissions Harvests intervals (see Whitepaper). Therefore, we hope we can achieve our initial funding target through price appreciation of the ZPHR Governance Token.

Also, thanks for pointing out the missing LP wallet lock! It has now been locked, the certificate is available here: https://mudra.website/index/?certificate=yes&type=0&lp=0xbeaa938f3306827657ee033773713f1f86c58b39

Hi! Appreciate the feedback. We actually present the team (we are currently a team of two) in the presentation on our website https://www.zephyrtoken.com. But point taken, this information should be more visible and we are working on redesigning the website to display the information better.

About the team: We come from finance and air transport backgrounds and both always had very direct contact with carbon emissions during our careers. This matter is therefore very personal to us and this is why we are working on Zephyr. We have profiles on social media (Linkedin/Twitter) and one of us has been nominated by the European Union as a volunteer ambassador in the fight against climate change. We do not have strong followings, however, and this is why we did not want to put ourselves into the spotlight, but rather the cause we are working for.

In a world largely driven by financial decisions, we truly believe the only way to solve climate change is by rewriting the rules of the game and thereby allowing (retail) investors to profit from heavy polluters being too slow in adopting greener technologies. Regulatory carbon markets offer exactly that, albeit exclusively to institutional investors. And it works: EUAs (European Union Carbon Allowances) have been amongst the best-performing commodities in recent years. So the concept has been proven by institutional investors and we also strongly believe we have the knowledge and experience to deliver the product, now we are looking to build a community that can help us achieve our goals.

I read this "ZPHR Governance Token Pre-Launch Funding Progress: 5,300$/500,000$ (1.06%) " but I see LP on pancakeswap is only 0.42 BNB, if we buy it on the pancake swap, the funds will go straight to the LP at there, isn't? Your LP wallet is also unlocked, people should think its a big risk to invest on it. perhaps none is without risk, but others are able to make it as small as possible.

The mission is very noble but don't know how serious you are in achieving this mission. If this is anonymous team and no plans to disclose their team members, I don't think they are really serious about this mission. Maybe, just another front to attract investors. Because if they are serious, they need to disclose the people behind it so people know who are they working with.

I don't see any zephyr token project community, such as the telegram community, telegrwm channel for this project, in my opinion it needs to make it easier for interaction between the team & the community

I want to know more about this project

N/A