From my point if view, this crypto can give us a nice 1000x Nano.
One day, soon or later people will realise that is far away the best way to store value and to transfer value.
When next versions get even a better, echanges solves problems, and when all those new users retail and institucional start to get confident on the market..they will invest on low.m.cap coins, that can make the diference.
This one can doo it.
Lets be clear this last year everyone knows abouth btc. People who gets in probably will stay in. More probably if they get losses. And everyone who gets in and buy always doo it on btc and eth. ( i bought btc at 5k).
But if you stay in, you get news and you get info and on the end, clever people try to buy some alt thats with a low m.cap and can explode. Can be shiba? Sure, sure more coins will pump. But if you look the charts and you remind the chart of btc from 2 to 30 to 2 to 1000.. from my point of view the only one that can follow that steps is Nano. Because as i said all those new people that believe in crypto but is worried on carbon, issues fees etc, soon or late will.move to a beter tech.
Lets see in some years if im wright or wrong.
Currently everything looks like we entered bear market - 2-3 years of bleeding. Everything will dump 80-99%. No matter how strong fundamentally is your project. So I would rather avoid long term investments especially in low cap coins. BTW Nano is not that small that you describe it. Its top 80 CMC coin with 800 milion $ marketcap. There is a lot of space to go down.
And I dont agree with nano being "the best way to store value"
Well lets see..im still in profit,
I dont think thats a bear market. Its just a trap. And everyone now knows about enviromental issues of crypto...so...wich one will pump more when the trap ends? Guess so.
Lot of room down, lot of room up, i dont buy your thoughts.
Lets see what happen. Who is wright and who wrong.