Topic: Nearly true odds gambling? (Read 438 times)
Seems Legit to me but I pass.
On suitable volume, it should be possible to offer a 0.1% edge and be profitable (over the long term - as variance can cause even a site with a 10% edge to lose money in the short term).
My impression is that the gambling websites with a 1% edge are making large profits.
My impression is that the gambling websites with a 1% edge are making large profits.
Just-Dice.com has a 1% house edge, but after more than 1.1 billion bets has only kept 0.32% of the amount wagered. The reason not many sites offer much less than 1% edge games is that the smaller the house edge, the greater the effect of variance, and the more likely the site is to go bust. In other words, the smaller the edge, the bigger the bankroll the house requires to be safe from going bust.
Sites which offer player-vs-player games can obviously afford to take a much smaller cut, since they are guaranteed to win a little from every bet.
On suitable volume, it should be possible to offer a 0.1% edge and be profitable (over the long term - as variance can cause even a site with a 10% edge to lose money in the short term).
My impression is that the gambling websites with a 1% edge are making large profits.
My impression is that the gambling websites with a 1% edge are making large profits.
I've asked peerbet admin this before, and he states that bit777 gambling site funds (he owns both sites) help completely fund peerbet and bit777.
Also, the BTC lost by gamblers obviously is also their money.
Casinobitco.in owns both sites now. Also, the BTC lost by gamblers obviously is also their money.
I've asked peerbet admin this before, and he states that bit777 gambling site funds (he owns both sites) help completely fund peerbet and bit777.
Also, the BTC lost by gamblers obviously is also their money.
Also, the BTC lost by gamblers obviously is also their money.
I'm curious, is the reason why there aren't many gambling websites that offer a house edge of just 0.1-0.9% because it's not profitable due to the transaction fees that would actually cause them to lose money? So 1% is actually the threshold?
If so, does this mean that peerbet.org's raffles with 0% house edge are actually "sponsored" by peerbet.org free of charge? I.e., they pay for the transactions out of their own wallet and don't get any profit whatsoever? Similar with peerdice.org that has a 0.3% house edge?
If so, does this mean that peerbet.org's raffles with 0% house edge are actually "sponsored" by peerbet.org free of charge? I.e., they pay for the transactions out of their own wallet and don't get any profit whatsoever? Similar with peerdice.org that has a 0.3% house edge?
Jump to: