Topic: negative trust been mislead by lutpin (Read 950 times)
I see no issue with such neutral rating. The rating is factually accurate and is an opportunity to allow you to not have the scorn of a negative rating after asking for loans that you clearly did not have any intention of repaying. The neutral rating will serve as a warning to others as to your history and will give others a reason to have a lower threshold of distrusting you if you exhibit suspicious behavior in the future.
Neutral feedback will only effect the sale of your account if the buyer is planning on doing anything other than posting. Sig campaigns allow such feedback.
EDIT:
loser cussface - Don't think I've ever heard that before
EDIT:
loser cussface - Don't think I've ever heard that before
...my account is in a minus state hence why i can't sell my account.
Perhaps you were dropped on your head one too many times hence your poor grip on the English language.
Also, boohoo you can't sell your account now. We all feel so bad for you. What a pity no one can scam/sig spam with it now.
Whats the reason of this pool? All i can see that neutral feedback is valid, because it has valid reason too (reference). Voted "no"
The feedback given to you should remain posted in your feedback. Feedback serves as a referece of which what the user has done previously or still doing at the moment. It's meant to be a record to track your trustworthiness in the forum so deleting it just because it was done before or you stopped doing it doesn't make any sense.
This thread deserves a NSFW tag.
Anyhow, to comment seriously on the matter.
If you think I would change/delete my ratings based on anonymous polls rather than arguments and facts, you're very delusional.
Have a look on the No votes dude. You only got a neutral trust at the moment which is still acceptable by many signature campaigns
Don't try for a Negative ones which will make it worthless
Don't try for a Negative ones which will make it worthless
- You should have to think earlier before doing shady things
- Even if you did because you were unknown about the consequences, you had to leave the account and make a fresh new start
I've Voted "No". I think the neutural feedback of lutpin should remain in your trust page for future reference. and it will not effect your account and your trust as well, I don't know why you are still worrying about this.
your trust is just fine. so just adjust with this single neutral feedback. with this attitude and spamming you'll get surely a negative feedback.
your trust is just fine. so just adjust with this single neutral feedback. with this attitude and spamming you'll get surely a negative feedback.
I don't even have negs left to you, hell, go cry to the ones that do.
You've essentially failed to understand the bitcointalk trust system and you're barking up the wrong tree.
Go ahead and assemble all the guys being owned by me,
maybe the one that asked for a $6.6Million loan the other day will join you in your endeavor against the misleading lutpin guy.
You've essentially failed to understand the bitcointalk trust system and you're barking up the wrong tree.
Go ahead and assemble all the guys being owned by me,
maybe the one that asked for a $6.6Million loan the other day will join you in your endeavor against the misleading lutpin guy.
you got no negative trust.
Coming from someone who knows a thing or two about negative (default) trust.
you got no negative trust.
i been asking for 2 high loan requests previously 3 months back i finally get negatively looked on by lutpin i pm him explaining when he'll remove it and fount out now that my account is in a minus state hence why i can't sell my account. if anyone else is being owned by lutpin please help us out so we can stop him from negatively trusting users he uses it too throw other users off i mean im still on bitcointalk and haven't done anything after my neg trust can someone right this for me because i can;t
Jump to: