Author

Topic: Negative trust from DT1 due to random speculation on uncertain event. (Read 264 times)

member
Activity: 224
Merit: 23
Now do you have any evidence that is required to substantiate the claims made against me because nobody else has anything at all?
in vain, there is no meaning anymore, everything has been swallowed up by the earth, after all some people who 'claim' for you are no longer here.

Only 1-2 people are still there, I don't think they care about you anymore.
Though, a ton of evidence is pouring in here, that there is new drama on the back rally.

It is difficult for former thugs to be trusted by people. Thugs are still thugs, even though he repents, it will take a long time to restore his dignity and honor.

Of course rats like the atmosphere when the cat has been busy with other things.
Nah,,this is what it says, looking for (opportunities) within (narrowness).

Although, everyone is busy partying, if you take one meat for you to eat, everyone will know the lost meat, you take it. you know what I mean: Alt+CH

Is google translate bugging out again.
Try again later yoshie.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 125
I should not trust newbie posting like this destroying the system especially in the DT Trust system. It was created and it is not moderated by the MODS beause admin trusts all users that will go through such honest in decisin making in giving negative and positive trust. This should not be the reason to be used as to destroy the dignity or integrity of the users account by just giving a negstivr trust with with no concrete reasons and all are just speculations. We have to be positive with all users here except are those who clearly violates the forum rules and regulations.
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1759
Now do you have any evidence that is required to substantiate the claims made against me because nobody else has anything at all?
in vain, there is no meaning anymore, everything has been swallowed up by the earth, after all some people who 'claim' for you are no longer here.

Only 1-2 people are still there, I don't think they care about you anymore.
Though, a ton of evidence is pouring in here, that there is new drama on the back rally.

It is difficult for former thugs to be trusted by people. Thugs are still thugs, even though he repents, it will take a long time to restore his dignity and honor.

Of course rats like the atmosphere when the cat has been busy with other things.
Nah,,this is what it says, looking for (opportunities) within (narrowness).

Although, everyone is busy partying, if you take one meat for you to eat, everyone will know the lost meat, you take it. you know what I mean: Alt+CH
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 23
So far, everyone has calmed down and enjoyed the atmosphere away from TOAA.
Yep, and it didn't take long for OP to convince me that he's an alt of CH/TOAA, so he's going on ignore.

And OP, I have no doubt you were expecting some negative feedback so I don't know why you're bitching about it.  I agree with you that the hacking allegation needs some evidence to back it, else that part of the feedback shouldn't be there.  Maybe JollyGood will provide that evidence, maybe he won't, but this crusade you've been on for almost 2 years now has gotten very, very stale.  Nobody is listening to your complaints and you've garnered no support aside from your alt accounts.  Why not just give it up already?  If you don't like bitcointalk, find another forum that has a trust system you can live with.

as said by @Lafu, what many know about Trust & DT is: CH / TOAA.
Yeah and they have the same gripes and the same deaf ears when it comes to listening to other members who disagree with them. 

Well there it is then.
Aside from your speculation as to who I may be.  You said it yourself the claims made are lacking any forum of evidence and vod is just lying.

Independently verifiable truths require no support.

Let's recap

1.  Jolly good has no evidence there was any hack
2.  Jolly good has no evidence  that I have anything to do with a hack that probably didnt happen.
3. Vod claims he never said part of his brain had died. When he did
4. The ultra elite is ... well let's forget about that scammer supporter.
5. Suchmoon  claims is you present independently verifiable truths that demonstrate Dt1 is lying and manipulating flagging to protect their sponsor is shit stirring and should be mentioned on your trust sheet.  Even though suchmoon stated they object to the misrepresentation of personal messages between lfc and themselves that have caused suchmoon to exclude lfc bitcoin from their trust lost.


Lol let me know if any of that is something anyone wants to dispute.

Ha yes just expect negative trust for whistle blowing and telling the truth.

Okay my dear friends.

OTOH why not enjoy crushing these rats and making sure they don't sweep their dirty dishonest deeds under the carpet?

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2444
https://JetCash.com
I didn't know whether to tag the op for agressive and insulting behaviour. Or reward a polite response.
I'm in a good mood despite all the vaxatious comments i get, so I awarded five merits. 😋
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6809
Cashback 15%
So far, everyone has calmed down and enjoyed the atmosphere away from TOAA.
Yep, and it didn't take long for OP to convince me that he's an alt of CH/TOAA, so he's going on ignore.

And OP, I have no doubt you were expecting some negative feedback so I don't know why you're bitching about it.  I agree with you that the hacking allegation needs some evidence to back it, else that part of the feedback shouldn't be there.  Maybe JollyGood will provide that evidence, maybe he won't, but this crusade you've been on for almost 2 years now has gotten very, very stale.  Nobody is listening to your complaints and you've garnered no support aside from your alt accounts.  Why not just give it up already?  If you don't like bitcointalk, find another forum that has a trust system you can live with.

as said by @Lafu, what many know about Trust & DT is: CH / TOAA.
Yeah and they have the same gripes and the same deaf ears when it comes to listening to other members who disagree with them. 
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 23
Stick to the specific feedback the thread is about you ugly little mongrel. 0
Very easy to lure mosquitoes out of the gutter.

as expected...!
come on ...!

So far, everyone has calmed down and enjoyed the atmosphere away from TOAA.

Keep asking if you can sig spam from your aunties dogs account and not be banned.
Embarrassing.
There have been many Alts, spammers, con artists, who have been (aware) in this forum, only you are hard (made aware).

i never stopped for it...

I hope you are given guidance by the universe and find yourself.
boring....

Here, give me a toke on that thing.

Of course rats like the atmosphere when the cat has been busy with other things.

Now do you have any evidence that is required to substantiate the claims made against me because nobody else has anything at all?


legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1759
Stick to the specific feedback the thread is about you ugly little mongrel. 0
Very easy to lure mosquitoes out of the gutter.

as expected...!
come on ...!

So far, everyone has calmed down and enjoyed the atmosphere away from TOAA.

Keep asking if you can sig spam from your aunties dogs account and not be banned.
Embarrassing.
There have been many Alts, spammers, con artists, who have been (aware) in this forum, only you are hard (made aware).

i never stopped for it...

I hope you are given guidance by the universe and find yourself.
boring....
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 23
Does this not devalue the trust system and endanger honest users. ?r
Absolutely not'.
In general, beginners who come here don't know about trust & DT.

as said by @Lafu, what many know about Trust & DT is: CH / TOAA.

Sounds like another Account from CH / TOAA to me !

Same complaining as always about DT1 and DT2 with the same content.
The only thing thats new there is not a text wall as we are know it .
So why you are not posting with your real Account ?
Oh wait , yes scared for possible get tagged from others !  

Honest people never get 'Negative' trust.
the opposite is pretending to be an honest person who gets a negative trust.

Please no speculation.

Stick to the specific feedback the thread is about you ugly little mongrel. 0

1 lafu was connected and enticing people into a huge exit scam where millions of dollars of honest investors money is gone
2. Provide evidence there was a hack
3. Provide I had anything to do with the alleged and unproven hack.

Hurry up you filthy little turd world pleb. I'm not interested in shared fantasies with lafu the exit scam pusher.
This is specifically regarding the feedback of the supposed  hack I allegedly  committed. Related to this negative trust
How are lowly shit stains like this yoshie still here. Keep asking if you can sig spam from your aunties dogs account and not be banned.
Embarrassing.


legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1759
Does this not devalue the trust system and endanger honest users. ?r
Absolutely not'.
In general, beginners who come here don't know about trust & DT.

as said by @Lafu, what many know about Trust & DT is: CH / TOAA.

Sounds like another Account from CH / TOAA to me !

Same complaining as always about DT1 and DT2 with the same content.
The only thing thats new there is not a text wall as we are know it .
So why you are not posting with your real Account ?
Oh wait , yes scared for possible get tagged from others !  

Honest people never get 'Negative' trust.
the opposite is pretending to be an honest person who gets a negative trust.

What level of evidence is sensible.?
of you speaking and answering is sufficient proof.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 23
Does this not devalue the trust system and endanger honest users. ?r
If someone has no proof an account was hacked and no evidence a certain member hacked it  ( which is obviously since there is no evidence it was hacked in the first place. )

How does that form a basis for a red tag?

What level of evidence is sensible.?
Is a random accusation speculating on an uncertain event.

I would like jollygood to comment and show his evidence for

1 the event even having taken a place as he claims
2 my involvement in anyway.

All others are welcome.
Jump to: