Topic: Negative trust revisiting time! (Read 847 times)
Yeah that list sorry... the one with ukyo and all those other clowns.
It would be nice if forum admins took time to revist default trust list. You know, like maybe they could do it every errr well, just once would be nice!
My comment isnt directed at OP, he does a good job looking out for scams and warning people. I just mean they should remove the crap load of confirmed scammers still on default trust list.
My comment isnt directed at OP, he does a good job looking out for scams and warning people. I just mean they should remove the crap load of confirmed scammers still on default trust list.
I think you're referring to some people in the outer tiers of the Trust list, and not the Default Trust itself, which only consists of 12 people. But yes, I totally agree that those tiers should be frequently evaluated (mine is) to add or remove people as necessary.
It would be nice if forum admins took time to revist default trust list. You know, like maybe they could do it every errr well, just once would be nice!
My comment isnt directed at OP, he does a good job looking out for scams and warning people. I just mean they should remove the crap load of confirmed scammers still on default trust list.
My comment isnt directed at OP, he does a good job looking out for scams and warning people. I just mean they should remove the crap load of confirmed scammers still on default trust list.
I think this is a good thing to be doing for the community. I see that you have been very active in trying to weed out the scammers on here.
From what I have noticed with accounts that are "red" is that they are often "abandoned" and have not posted in several months.
From what I have noticed with accounts that are "red" is that they are often "abandoned" and have not posted in several months.
Thats a very nice move from your side to give users that you gave a negative trust a chance if they deserve it.
If I have left you any negative trust that you feel is unwarranted, please reply back to this thread and I'll gladly review your case. I periodically go back through and audit my ratings and remove the ones that no longer apply, but the list has grown so large that .. well, ok I'm just too lazy to sit here and go through the entire thing user by user. So if you have something that you think might need a second look, please post here and I'll check it out ASAP.
Ex: Yours was a borderline case where I should have given you the benefit of the doubt, but didn't. Or you were initially flagged with negative trust but have since been an active contributing member of the forum. Things like that.
Ex: Yours was a borderline case where I should have given you the benefit of the doubt, but didn't. Or you were initially flagged with negative trust but have since been an active contributing member of the forum. Things like that.
Jump to: