Author

Topic: nem stake holder list (Read 881 times)

sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
February 19, 2014, 08:36:22 AM
#11
Where is the option to go back to the drawing board, remove the IPO, reissue NEM as proof of work for distribution, then convert to proof of stake once all shares have been mined?

There is no option for this because the developer wants money.  How much did he get?  Like 100 BTC?  More?  How is that a "New Economcy Movement".  He's issuing currency for profit.  That's an old economy movement.  Ultracoin, Coinye, many others have all done the same thing.  They're all referred to as scammers.  Is it any different because the thing is written in Java?  That's not a "feature", that's just another negative to add on the stack.

100 BTC belong to the NEM community not the developers. If you want to develop NEMcoins and apps for the community, that money could be given to you. We have no new codes yet so it is not like developers trying to sell the coin/ software they already made. People with a shared idea chipping money together to make something great.  Is that concept too difficult to understand to you  ? BTW, this is an open invitation to join NEM development team if you share the same idea with the NEM community. We always need talented developers and helpers.

About mining, thank you but NO. What's the purpose of running useless calculation? especially if we don't need to. "I don't think this world needs people just to waste CPU time and electricity with no purpose" .
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
February 19, 2014, 08:25:10 AM
#10
Where is the option to go back to the drawing board, remove the IPO, reissue NEM as proof of work for distribution, then convert to proof of stake once all shares have been mined?

There is no option for this because the developer wants money.  How much did he get?  Like 100 BTC?  More?  How is that a "New Economcy Movement".  He's issuing currency for profit.  That's an old economy movement.  Ultracoin, Coinye, many others have all done the same thing.  They're all referred to as scammers.  Is it any different because the thing is written in Java?  That's not a "feature", that's just another negative to add on the stack.
sr. member
Activity: 274
Merit: 250
February 19, 2014, 07:47:46 AM
#9
I believe in the law of NEM.

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
February 19, 2014, 05:55:23 AM
#8
Also want to point out your misuse of the word 'fair'. How exactly is it fair that people lose their stakes purely on the basis that they don't post on this message board? I understand that NEM would be fairer if sock-puppets were removed and hopefully some of them will be, but a blanket removal of anyone in group 3 is actually very unfair.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
February 19, 2014, 05:40:22 AM
#7
And where will their stakes go ? Partly in your pocket ? Don't be so greedy OP...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
February 19, 2014, 05:25:07 AM
#6
Don't be ridiculous, the guys running NEM have stated in the past that he won't change rules retroactively and now you want him to refund about half the stake-holders?
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 502
February 19, 2014, 05:01:38 AM
#5
Who should be taken off the list for what reason? I don't get it.

Group 3: accounts opened for NEM registration only (1 post)
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
February 19, 2014, 04:55:59 AM
#4
Fairness is a lie. There is only fairness  in ideals. I born with this family and in this country is it fair?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
February 19, 2014, 04:53:57 AM
#3
Who should be taken off the list for what reason? I don't get it.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1023
February 18, 2014, 08:25:54 PM
#2
whats group 3?
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
February 18, 2014, 05:38:11 PM
#1
..
Jump to: