Author

Topic: Neoscrypt hashrate discussion (Read 4077 times)

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
December 16, 2014, 11:04:58 PM
#26
hate the N
some much heat and too much memory for rigs

Agreed - makes the rigs cost more.

About the half scrypt hash thing - no way. I know of no 290X card that will exceed 1210kh/s on scrypt.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
December 16, 2014, 05:46:23 PM
#24
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

Edit: I mean Amph.

it was long time ago, with my old 290(not x) on scrypt-n algo

it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

450 is close to my 280X hashrate, so yeah, not quite like scrypt-N.

mine was regular 290(not x), with your version i could have done better for sure, i was using an old cgminer

I never made a version of scrypt-N. I mean, not until recently, and that's hardly any better.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
December 16, 2014, 02:41:29 PM
#22
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

You mean me? Or him, for Scrypt-N?

Sorry, I mean Amph. I know you will share it when you want.

Not my call this time.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
December 16, 2014, 02:29:18 PM
#20
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

You mean me? Or him, for Scrypt-N?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
December 16, 2014, 12:01:18 PM
#17
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

450 is close to my 280X hashrate, so yeah, not quite like scrypt-N.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
December 16, 2014, 06:59:09 PM
#15
hate the N
some much heat and too much memory for rigs
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
December 16, 2014, 03:29:53 PM
#14
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

Edit: I mean Amph.

it was long time ago, with my old 290(not x) on scrypt-n algo

it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

450 is close to my 280X hashrate, so yeah, not quite like scrypt-N.

mine was regular 290(not x), with your version i could have done better for sure, i was using an old cgminer
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
December 16, 2014, 02:32:09 PM
#13
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

You mean me? Or him, for Scrypt-N?

Sorry, I mean Amph. I know you will share it when you want.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
December 16, 2014, 02:25:45 PM
#12
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version

Would you like to share your setting or the source?

Edit: I mean Amph.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 12:04:58 PM
#11
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

My card does 820KH in scrypt so quite not accurate.... 265 its definitely not half of it
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
December 16, 2014, 11:58:12 AM
#10
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt

I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt.

i was doing 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
December 16, 2014, 10:50:58 AM
#9
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 09:38:38 AM
#8
Weirdly, if I permute the state ONCE, it slows down, but if I do it and reverse it dozens of times, it's faster. This is stupid.

What you mean?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 14, 2014, 09:14:34 AM
#7
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.

As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable  Grin

It's way more profitable.

Man my card is not Elpida and using your kernel and tweaking dont get anything stable apart from 265kh!

It can get a bit higher, to maybe 300, but that's about it.

Well thats extra 25khash so would be nice! Since in the beginning ppl where mining with 90kh per card
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 14, 2014, 08:01:21 AM
#6
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.

As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable  Grin

It's way more profitable.

Man my card is not Elpida and using your kernel and tweaking dont get anything stable apart from 265kh!
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 13, 2014, 05:36:30 AM
#5
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.

As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable  Grin
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
December 13, 2014, 04:53:34 AM
#4
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.

yeh, sure.. not even breaking even with new x11 +50% kernel
only x11 near to neo profit is dark when diff is low, but it will not last long
so u may say x11 vs neo 75% of profit
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
December 13, 2014, 12:27:36 AM
#3
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 12, 2014, 02:39:09 PM
#2
BUMP! Im suddenly down to 90kh with the same settings  Huh Huh
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 11, 2014, 04:00:48 PM
#1
So I do not open this thread to talk about the profitability of gpu mining, I just want to compare and try to improve settings for mining neoscrypt coins (feathercoins)

So far this is what ive been able to get on a R9 280X VaporX TriX






Im on Windows 8.1 Pro x64 and using Catalyst 14.4, a FX6300 and 16GB ram.

Im pretty sure I should be able to squeeze some extra hashes, considering in the beginning people was getting no more than 100kh per one of this
cards, and I was able to get almost 275 without playing a lot!

This is my sgminer.conf

Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://ftc-neo.give-me-coins.com:3336",
"user" : ".1",
"pass" : "x"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "13",
"worksize" : "64",
"kernel" : "neoscrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-fan" : "0-75",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Please guys I need some help on this  Smiley
Jump to: