Last few month I've noticed bad tactics from nice hash, we all Know what they do.
They pile on the coin, destroy the difficulty , take all the coins and then cut back on hash till difficulty levels lower.
So gpu mining algo gets updates to make sure asics can't mine.
Well why isn't the same thing as Asic protection happening with Nice hash. ?
Nice hash in its current form can be classed as hostile due to the way it works and it needs Tobe changed as with asics , nice hash has a unfair advantage which makes mining along side it unfair, hence why I call it hostile.
They pile on the coin, destroy the difficulty , take all the coins and then cut back on hash till difficulty levels lower.
So gpu mining algo gets updates to make sure asics can't mine.
Well why isn't the same thing as Asic protection happening with Nice hash. ?
Nice hash in its current form can be classed as hostile due to the way it works and it needs Tobe changed as with asics , nice hash has a unfair advantage which makes mining along side it unfair, hence why I call it hostile.
Sometimes you can use Nicehash for good, if used wit caution
but sometimes someone stupid put the crazy order which send the diff right to the Moon
And best we can do - switch to another coin for such moments
