Topic: New Brainkey wallet built with location and password (Read 216 times)
Still hoping for feedback
Please let me know if you run into issues testing. I validated everything on ubuntu but other OS are untested.
I could memorize a 12 word seed and a passphrase
- yes but its much harder to memorize and you would also not be able to quickly transfer it to a family member without revealing the entropy in the transmission
you would have a much greater chance of hacking this than you would of hacking 12 random BIP39 words.
- yes, but it still would not be feasible. Even if I would tell you where the location is you would not be able to recover the key. You would need to spend about 1$ in computational costs per password candidate you try just for the 9 square meter area I told you the key comes from. You would also not know how much is in my wallet so you might spend a billion dollar on a brute force and then end up with a wallet containing 1btc...
One could also choose to create a geokey with a location and 12 random BIP39 words as password if the paranoia or wallet is big enough.
- yes but its much harder to memorize and you would also not be able to quickly transfer it to a family member without revealing the entropy in the transmission
you would have a much greater chance of hacking this than you would of hacking 12 random BIP39 words.
- yes, but it still would not be feasible. Even if I would tell you where the location is you would not be able to recover the key. You would need to spend about 1$ in computational costs per password candidate you try just for the 9 square meter area I told you the key comes from. You would also not know how much is in my wallet so you might spend a billion dollar on a brute force and then end up with a wallet containing 1btc...
One could also choose to create a geokey with a location and 12 random BIP39 words as password if the paranoia or wallet is big enough.
The brute force requirement gives you the economic security against the attack.
Sure, but there is no requirement for me to also have to brute force my own keys to provide security against an attacker brute forcing them. I could memorize a 12 word seed and a passphrase - I don't have to brute force anything to access my coins, but an attacker still would.maybe relative easier but still unfeasible to guess. I bet 1 btc, you or anyone else wont be able to hack this.
Depends who the target is. If you were to know someone's name and could look them up on Facebook or other social media, you would have a much greater chance of hacking this than you would of hacking 12 random BIP39 words.
It sounds like your solution to this is to make people brute force their own private keys, which is far from optimal.
- you seem to have not read the paper. The brute force requirement gives you the economic security against the attack.
are of low entropy and much easier for an attacker to guess/hack
- maybe relative easier but still unfeasible to guess. I bet 1 btc, you or anyone else wont be able to hack this.
- you seem to have not read the paper. The brute force requirement gives you the economic security against the attack.
are of low entropy and much easier for an attacker to guess/hack
- maybe relative easier but still unfeasible to guess. I bet 1 btc, you or anyone else wont be able to hack this.
true, you would need to choose a bigger search radius or recover from the old map data.
It sounds like your solution to this is to make people brute force their own private keys, which is far from optimal.However if you are in risk of losing your paper wallet for example in the refugee case, carrying it on you physically might be a bigger risk than forgetting it.
Sure, there are times when committing a wallet to memory would be advantageous. But why would you use a human selected location and password, which as I mentioned above, are of low entropy and much easier for an attacker to guess/hack than simply memorizing a 12 word seed phrase which, if generated securely, is completely unhackable.
Is the geographical co-ordinated just a random location or can this be a specific location that you pick?
- you can pick any location from a map. This is currently not part of the poc and more a implementation detail. i would recommend only offline map data.
On google earth i can pin pretty much meter accurate.
I simply store pieces of the whole Private key in different online services
- of course but you could not easily transfer this to another person. If you are stuck somewhere and your last hope is a single phone call, what would you do?
- you can pick any location from a map. This is currently not part of the poc and more a implementation detail. i would recommend only offline map data.
On google earth i can pin pretty much meter accurate.
I simply store pieces of the whole Private key in different online services
- of course but you could not easily transfer this to another person. If you are stuck somewhere and your last hope is a single phone call, what would you do?
From where are you sourcing the geographical co-ordinates you will be using?
- the poc recommends using map data.
Due to the movement of tectonic plates, global co-ordinates do not remain static over time
- true, you would need to choose a bigger search radius or recover from the old map data. I would not recommend it for long term storage anyways.
There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
- it is true that it wont allways prevent humans from losing their keys. Either cause they cant remember or they choose a really weak password and a very popular location that an attacker might target. So basically it wont prevent people from being stupid, how could it.
However if you are in risk of losing your paper wallet for example in the refugee case, carrying it on you physically might be a bigger risk than forgetting it.
If you would burry a treasure in meatspace would you hide it at a popular place with weak access security?
- the poc recommends using map data.
Due to the movement of tectonic plates, global co-ordinates do not remain static over time
- true, you would need to choose a bigger search radius or recover from the old map data. I would not recommend it for long term storage anyways.
There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
- it is true that it wont allways prevent humans from losing their keys. Either cause they cant remember or they choose a really weak password and a very popular location that an attacker might target. So basically it wont prevent people from being stupid, how could it.
However if you are in risk of losing your paper wallet for example in the refugee case, carrying it on you physically might be a bigger risk than forgetting it.
If you would burry a treasure in meatspace would you hide it at a popular place with weak access security?
Is the geographical co-ordinated just a random location or can this be a specific location that you pick? When I first read this wall of text, it looked like you are giving the co-ordinates? Reason why I ask, is the security issues if it takes your physical location, because it will compromise your actual location and then make you a target for a physical attack, if someone was able to track you down from the co-ordinates provided.
Also, hiding a broken up Private key online would not be a big deal for me, if I had to flee my country. I simply store pieces of the whole Private key in different online services that nobody would be able to decipher. The refugees could have done the same, if they just knew what to do.
From where are you sourcing the geographical co-ordinates you will be using?
- the poc recommends using map data.
Due to the movement of tectonic plates, global co-ordinates do not remain static over time
- true, you would need to choose a bigger search radius or recover from the old map data. I would not recommend it for long term storage anyways.
There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
- it is true that it wont allways prevent humans from losing their keys. Either cause they cant remember or they choose a really weak password and a very popular location that an attacker might target. So basically it wont prevent people from being stupid, how could it.
However if you are in risk of losing your paper wallet for example in the refugee case, carrying it on you physically might be a bigger risk than forgetting it.
If you would burry a treasure in meatspace would you hide it at a popular place with weak access security?
- the poc recommends using map data.
Due to the movement of tectonic plates, global co-ordinates do not remain static over time
- true, you would need to choose a bigger search radius or recover from the old map data. I would not recommend it for long term storage anyways.
There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
- it is true that it wont allways prevent humans from losing their keys. Either cause they cant remember or they choose a really weak password and a very popular location that an attacker might target. So basically it wont prevent people from being stupid, how could it.
However if you are in risk of losing your paper wallet for example in the refugee case, carrying it on you physically might be a bigger risk than forgetting it.
If you would burry a treasure in meatspace would you hide it at a popular place with weak access security?
From where are you sourcing the geographical co-ordinates you will be using? Due to the movement of tectonic plates, global co-ordinates do not remain static over time. Back in 2017, Australia's co-ordinates were shifted by a full 2 meters to compensate for this, for example. Similar things happen to other countries, and will continue to happen over time. If you are using this for long-term storage, you might find your co-ordinates a long way off by the time you come to access the coins.
Further, this is essentially just another brain wallet. Millions of people around the world every day suffer a stroke, hemorrhage, brain injury, trauma, etc., which leaves them with long term memory problems. You are just as likely to forget a location and a password in these scenarios as you are to forget 12 words you have committed to memory. Your method also has very poor entropy, since the co-ordinates and password will be human picked, and could be significantly narrowed down by a bit of social engineering. There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
Further, this is essentially just another brain wallet. Millions of people around the world every day suffer a stroke, hemorrhage, brain injury, trauma, etc., which leaves them with long term memory problems. You are just as likely to forget a location and a password in these scenarios as you are to forget 12 words you have committed to memory. Your method also has very poor entropy, since the co-ordinates and password will be human picked, and could be significantly narrowed down by a bit of social engineering. There is no substitute for writing your seed down on paper.
I created a replacement for seed phrases:
https://github.com/oscar-davids/geokeytool
Geokeys for Bitcoin and Ether and other killer apps like pgp, ssh
Introduction: Today it is hard for anyone to recover a private key from memory. Brainkey implementations usually require the user to memorize a set of words. Most implementations want the user to remember a set of 12-24 words. While it is possible to memorize those seed phrases it is also very likely to forget them and highly unlikely that a user can quickly transfer them to another user without revealing the secret to unwanted listeners. Other key recovery methods have dependencies on either a trusted party or a decentralized application. Those leave the user at risk of losing access to their keys by either the trusted party removing your access or a bug in a dApp can lock your access as well.
In this paper, we propose a private key recovery system that allows people to remember/recover it without any accessories or aids. The system needs just a location and a password to recover a key. We prove that neither the key nor the encryption are weakened by this system. The simplicity of the implementation allows us to get rid of:
a middleman,
a smart contract
a centralized recovery system,
a online connection
As we will see further below that empowers users to:
create and memorize a key with very low chances of forgetting it
transfer a key quickly verbally to another person
the entropy during the transfer does not need to be stored in clear text
recover their key at a low cost
Abstract: A key recovery method that uses a known and a partially known secret that forces the recovery to use a brute force mechanism to get to the full secret of the partial secret and that validates the results with the existence of the key on a blockchain, ledger, database... .
A ECDSA or other cryptographic key pair might be built using one or many known secrets and one or many partially known secrets. Once this key has interacted with a blockchain, ledger... it is possible to recover it by creating all possible keys with the known and the partial known secret(s) by guessing the missing part(s) of the partially secret(s). To identify which was the original key to recover all created keys need to be looked up on a blockchain or ledger as only the one which has interacted with it will be traceable there.
Working principle: A user generating a private key picks a precise location from a map and a password. A key generator uses the password and the location's geo coordinates as salt and digests everything with a high computational cost (in our PoC BCrypt) to create a ECDSA key-pair. The precision of the geo location needs to be known down to a meter level but the key generator will add a random and unknown decimal degree up to millimeter depending on the targeted security of the key.
As we will see, we generate entropy by having every square centimeter on Earth in combination with an infinite number of possible passwords.
To recover the key the user will have to brute force all coordinates around the location on a scale of square meters with the known password. The location is quite vague since the user never knew which centimeter he chose from the map when he generated the key but only roughly the position. He will have to try through all possible square centimeter around the location he set. This will take a bit of time to recover the key but the chance for the user who knows the location and the password is high. For state of the art technology this will be on the scale of 1 computational day or 1$. For an attacker, the chance to guess both location and password is small. Even for a known password and an approximate guess of the location (i.e. to know which city) does not significantly speed up the brute force process.
Since every generated key is valid, both the attacker and the user have to check all created keys to have a balance on the blockchain in order to identify the one they wanted to recover.
Emotions are the best incorporeal storage on meatspace! The emotional connection to locations make them an easy thing to remember. One can transfer the key easily to someone without revealing the information in clear text and thus without reducing the entropy. An example: "The place where we kissed the first time and the nickname of our child when it wasn't born yet is the map to my treasure." This sentence would be enough for your partner to recover the key and it would be a low security risk to even say this in a room with many people listening. Yet the entropy of the information has been sufficiently transported. Your partner would have a big advantage at least to brute force to the example quicker as someone who might guess part of the secret like the name of the unborn child, even if he additionally can guess part of the location like the region or city. Humans store informations by attaching them to emotions. This is how our brain links information and how it prioritizes the lifetime (time to live = TTL) of information. The stronger the emotion the better we remember.
The probability of guessing both location and password is low: For a mm range we are estimating the earth surface with 5,101e^+20 millimeter x n possibilities, while n is defined by the amount of tries the attacker is planning. If you consider only urban areas, take 0.1% of earth's surface.
A scale in Millimeters is resulting in very strong encryption as there are 100 times more possibilities than with cm or 1e^6 times more than meter. Still the encryption for a single meter is good enough for smaller amounts. The definition hereof is done by the decimal-degree of the geo coordinates in the salt. (metric is just a rounded value to make presentation easier since the coordinates are not metric. 000.00000001 = 1.1132 mm(equator) - 1.0247 mm(northpole)
If the location is known and the password isn’t, there is still a financial obstacle for the attack: The cost of the attack is proportionally higher than the recovery cost. In a wordlist attack of 10.000.000 words the attack would have 10.000.000 times the cost of the recovery itself. If a user has to spend 1$ or 1 day in computational efforts for recovery from a single password, the attack would cost 10.000.000$ or take 10.000.000 GPUs for one day with 10.000.000 passwords. If the balance of the key is below the attack cost or if the attack will not yield more than the computational efforts would yield with useful work like POW mining, the attacker is disincentivized to do the attack.
If the location and your password leaked, you put yourself in a bad position and your only chance is that you find the key and move the balance somewhere else, before an attacker does.
Hashing Function:
To strengthen the keys against any type of guessing or brute forcing attach we use a double hashing with a compute intensive hashing algorithm. In our PoC we use BCrypt but any hashing function that introduces a time/cost variable will work, for example SCrypt or Argon2. We chose BCrypt because of its long successful lifetime and the ability to sequence the hashing for parallelization.
To keep the keys deterministic, which is a requirement to be able to recover them, we needed to get rid of the randomness in the hashing function in the elliptic curve and replace it with something deterministic that is hard but not impossible to guess.
input1 = password
input2 = coordinates in decimal degrees
Remark: The definition of which variable is contained in input 1 and 2 is arbitrary, but needs to be aligned on.
prepare:
step1 BCrypt hashes the input1 with the salt==input2 at n rounds. This results in output1
step2 BCrypt hashes the input2 with the salt==output1 at n rounds. This results in output2
step3 ECDSA with output1 and output2==salt. This results into private key
Rounds in bcrypt are defined to slow a single hash digest down to about 500ms on a state of the art GPU.
Recovery GPU Time Cost (Jan 2020)
2x bcrypt 2e19 rounds on Nvidia 1080ti
estimated cost is 1$ per day since this is the max amount you could make with mining.
On mm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 104 GPU days or 104$
On cm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 24 GPU hours or 1$
On dm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 14 GPU minutes or 0.01$
On m^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 9 GPU seconds or 0.0001$
We can estimate using Shannon's Source Coding Theorem the maximum entropy in bits that such a system can provide
\lceil \log _2\left(x^10\left(36\times :y^{z+1}-1\right)\left(2\times :y^{z+1}-1\right)\right)\rceil == E
After plugging in the values 95(charset), 10(number of chars), and (7+1)(decimaldegree of location) for x(charset), y(number of chars) and z(decimaldegree of location) respectively, we obtain an ideal value (E) of 132-bits. This value provides us with a key-space which is more than the recommended 128.
\lceil \log _2\left(95^10\left(36\times :10^{8+1}-1\right)\left(2\times :10^{8+1}-1\right)\right)\rceil == E
132 bits entropy can be reached with the following password length and location quantifier:
a password of 9 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of mm (8+1)
a password of 10 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of cm (7+1)
a password of 11 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of dm (6+1)
a password of 12 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of m (5+1)
Lowering chars on the password will result in loss of appropriate entropy. Lowering space on quantifier will result in weakness against wordlist attacks.
Key Validation:
Calculate balance from public keys. Each created public key is used to calculate if it has a balance on the blockchain. Only the one that has a balance needs to be stored the rest can be deleted.
Difficulty adjustments: Every 4 years it is needed to reset the default rounds of security to match state of the art hashing. This also means to stay backwards compatible. You will have to do both the old default rounds and any new default rounds separately. We start in 2020 with recommended bcrypt cost of 19 (524288 rounds)
Recommended storage time: Since computers become faster over time, the time you store wealth behind such a key needs to be limited. Even so Moore's law makes it predictable when another difficulty adjustment is necessary, the recommendation is to create new keys at least every 4 years (assuming a max security decrease of times 16) and transfer funds to the new keys.
Specialist hardware and parallel computation for recovery: It is possible to build specialized hardware that can perform more hashes per watt/cost than GPUs can. Last FPGAs updates on the topic promise a four times better efficiency and since BCrypt is not memory intensive, it can be further optimized. Compared to CPU performance per Watt GPUs are already yielding about 35 times the efficiency and FPGAs 144 times. If the specialized hardware one day outperforms user equipment at a few magnitudes, as it happened with bitcoin Asic mining, key recovery can be computed in parallel with a cloud computing provider that rents this specialized equipment. This will allow to further harden the difficulty of a brute force with additional rounds in BCrypt but will keep the requirements on the initial key generator to a minimum to match user devices that wont contain specialized hardware. (in other words it is ok if the single key generation on a phone takes a minute if the recovery time can also happen in a minute) The draw back on it is that one day if this hardware exist, key recovery will become increasingly difficult with own hardware and will need the scaled recovery architecture to match performance of an attacker one day.
Awareness of infinite lifetime of keys: Making the keys deterministic also means encryption on anything you send will not stay secure forever.One day even so the elliptic curve cryptography might still not be broken, GPUs, FPGAs or ASICs might be fast enough to brute force to your old key and decrypt your old data. SO DON'T ENCRYPT PRIVATE STUFF WITH IT THAT SHOULD NEVER BE SEEN AGAIN!
Alibaba and the forty thieves: Old stories already hint the way to this encryption scheme. In Alibaba knowing the location and the password: "Open Simsim" was enough to get access to the thieves magic cave, but forgetting only parts of the secret had the severe consequence to be stuck in the hideout. The missing memory on the secret made the hero unsuccessfully brute force through all kinds of possibilities since he forgot to remember the exact password but had still a memory on parts of its entropy which was that it was "Open (a specific grain)". Similar applies with the GeoKeys. Someone trying to recover it from parts of the entropy will have still much higher chances than someone guessing all of it. The location and password was leaked cause the thieves had bad OpSec and revealed the location by opening the secret gate without realizing they were spied at. Same applies to the GeoKeys. If you reveal where you search and what you search for someone might sniff that information and try to brute force faster than you. Your advantage is that other than the thieves you do not have to be physically present to do your search. Map data is more accurate and secure than real time GPS tracking and creation and recovery can happen completely offline.
First use case: Of course this technique might not be secure enough to store millions of $$$ forever behind one key. For smaller amounts and limited time it works out well though. The reason I came up with this is inspired by stories I heard from refugees like my grandparents, losing every tiny bit they had when they were forced to flee from their country. Back then there was no bitcoin and they tried to hide what they had on their bodies. This tool increases the chances of wealth being well hidden from aggressors and recoverable for those in the greatest need.
Other types of implementations: Geo locations are just one way to get to a vague secret. Other implementations are possible as long as they have enough quantification possibilities. In geokeys we use the space abstraction meter to millimeter. This can be replaced with something similar that is easy to remember for a human and comes with the ability to quantify it down to smaller and smaller chunks. One could use a time-date instead of an vague location for example, and to recover brute force down to milliseconds of the exact time of the date the key was created with.
Thanks to my family which is very supportive with my ideas. Thanks to Jochen Mader from Germany for creating the first python poc script. Thanks to Oscar Davids from China for creating the openCL based recovery tool. Thanks to Hashcat for providing state of the art open source brute force technology. Thanks to Marc Cymontkowski and Fredrik Hocke from Germany for helping with the paper. Thanks to red4sec from Spain for guidance on entropy calculations
Philipp Angele 02/2020
https://github.com/oscar-davids/geokeytool
Geokeys for Bitcoin and Ether and other killer apps like pgp, ssh
Introduction: Today it is hard for anyone to recover a private key from memory. Brainkey implementations usually require the user to memorize a set of words. Most implementations want the user to remember a set of 12-24 words. While it is possible to memorize those seed phrases it is also very likely to forget them and highly unlikely that a user can quickly transfer them to another user without revealing the secret to unwanted listeners. Other key recovery methods have dependencies on either a trusted party or a decentralized application. Those leave the user at risk of losing access to their keys by either the trusted party removing your access or a bug in a dApp can lock your access as well.
In this paper, we propose a private key recovery system that allows people to remember/recover it without any accessories or aids. The system needs just a location and a password to recover a key. We prove that neither the key nor the encryption are weakened by this system. The simplicity of the implementation allows us to get rid of:
a middleman,
a smart contract
a centralized recovery system,
a online connection
As we will see further below that empowers users to:
create and memorize a key with very low chances of forgetting it
transfer a key quickly verbally to another person
the entropy during the transfer does not need to be stored in clear text
recover their key at a low cost
Abstract: A key recovery method that uses a known and a partially known secret that forces the recovery to use a brute force mechanism to get to the full secret of the partial secret and that validates the results with the existence of the key on a blockchain, ledger, database... .
A ECDSA or other cryptographic key pair might be built using one or many known secrets and one or many partially known secrets. Once this key has interacted with a blockchain, ledger... it is possible to recover it by creating all possible keys with the known and the partial known secret(s) by guessing the missing part(s) of the partially secret(s). To identify which was the original key to recover all created keys need to be looked up on a blockchain or ledger as only the one which has interacted with it will be traceable there.
Working principle: A user generating a private key picks a precise location from a map and a password. A key generator uses the password and the location's geo coordinates as salt and digests everything with a high computational cost (in our PoC BCrypt) to create a ECDSA key-pair. The precision of the geo location needs to be known down to a meter level but the key generator will add a random and unknown decimal degree up to millimeter depending on the targeted security of the key.
As we will see, we generate entropy by having every square centimeter on Earth in combination with an infinite number of possible passwords.
To recover the key the user will have to brute force all coordinates around the location on a scale of square meters with the known password. The location is quite vague since the user never knew which centimeter he chose from the map when he generated the key but only roughly the position. He will have to try through all possible square centimeter around the location he set. This will take a bit of time to recover the key but the chance for the user who knows the location and the password is high. For state of the art technology this will be on the scale of 1 computational day or 1$. For an attacker, the chance to guess both location and password is small. Even for a known password and an approximate guess of the location (i.e. to know which city) does not significantly speed up the brute force process.
Since every generated key is valid, both the attacker and the user have to check all created keys to have a balance on the blockchain in order to identify the one they wanted to recover.
Emotions are the best incorporeal storage on meatspace! The emotional connection to locations make them an easy thing to remember. One can transfer the key easily to someone without revealing the information in clear text and thus without reducing the entropy. An example: "The place where we kissed the first time and the nickname of our child when it wasn't born yet is the map to my treasure." This sentence would be enough for your partner to recover the key and it would be a low security risk to even say this in a room with many people listening. Yet the entropy of the information has been sufficiently transported. Your partner would have a big advantage at least to brute force to the example quicker as someone who might guess part of the secret like the name of the unborn child, even if he additionally can guess part of the location like the region or city. Humans store informations by attaching them to emotions. This is how our brain links information and how it prioritizes the lifetime (time to live = TTL) of information. The stronger the emotion the better we remember.
The probability of guessing both location and password is low: For a mm range we are estimating the earth surface with 5,101e^+20 millimeter x n possibilities, while n is defined by the amount of tries the attacker is planning. If you consider only urban areas, take 0.1% of earth's surface.
A scale in Millimeters is resulting in very strong encryption as there are 100 times more possibilities than with cm or 1e^6 times more than meter. Still the encryption for a single meter is good enough for smaller amounts. The definition hereof is done by the decimal-degree of the geo coordinates in the salt. (metric is just a rounded value to make presentation easier since the coordinates are not metric. 000.00000001 = 1.1132 mm(equator) - 1.0247 mm(northpole)
If the location is known and the password isn’t, there is still a financial obstacle for the attack: The cost of the attack is proportionally higher than the recovery cost. In a wordlist attack of 10.000.000 words the attack would have 10.000.000 times the cost of the recovery itself. If a user has to spend 1$ or 1 day in computational efforts for recovery from a single password, the attack would cost 10.000.000$ or take 10.000.000 GPUs for one day with 10.000.000 passwords. If the balance of the key is below the attack cost or if the attack will not yield more than the computational efforts would yield with useful work like POW mining, the attacker is disincentivized to do the attack.
If the location and your password leaked, you put yourself in a bad position and your only chance is that you find the key and move the balance somewhere else, before an attacker does.
Hashing Function:
To strengthen the keys against any type of guessing or brute forcing attach we use a double hashing with a compute intensive hashing algorithm. In our PoC we use BCrypt but any hashing function that introduces a time/cost variable will work, for example SCrypt or Argon2. We chose BCrypt because of its long successful lifetime and the ability to sequence the hashing for parallelization.
To keep the keys deterministic, which is a requirement to be able to recover them, we needed to get rid of the randomness in the hashing function in the elliptic curve and replace it with something deterministic that is hard but not impossible to guess.
input1 = password
input2 = coordinates in decimal degrees
Remark: The definition of which variable is contained in input 1 and 2 is arbitrary, but needs to be aligned on.
prepare:
step1 BCrypt hashes the input1 with the salt==input2 at n rounds. This results in output1
step2 BCrypt hashes the input2 with the salt==output1 at n rounds. This results in output2
step3 ECDSA with output1 and output2==salt. This results into private key
Rounds in bcrypt are defined to slow a single hash digest down to about 500ms on a state of the art GPU.
Recovery GPU Time Cost (Jan 2020)
2x bcrypt 2e19 rounds on Nvidia 1080ti
estimated cost is 1$ per day since this is the max amount you could make with mining.
On mm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 104 GPU days or 104$
On cm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 24 GPU hours or 1$
On dm^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 14 GPU minutes or 0.01$
On m^2 the cost of recovery from 9m^2 is about 9 GPU seconds or 0.0001$
We can estimate using Shannon's Source Coding Theorem the maximum entropy in bits that such a system can provide
\lceil \log _2\left(x^10\left(36\times :y^{z+1}-1\right)\left(2\times :y^{z+1}-1\right)\right)\rceil == E
After plugging in the values 95(charset), 10(number of chars), and (7+1)(decimaldegree of location) for x(charset), y(number of chars) and z(decimaldegree of location) respectively, we obtain an ideal value (E) of 132-bits. This value provides us with a key-space which is more than the recommended 128.
\lceil \log _2\left(95^10\left(36\times :10^{8+1}-1\right)\left(2\times :10^{8+1}-1\right)\right)\rceil == E
132 bits entropy can be reached with the following password length and location quantifier:
a password of 9 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of mm (8+1)
a password of 10 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of cm (7+1)
a password of 11 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of dm (6+1)
a password of 12 chars, a charset of 95 and a location quantifier of m (5+1)
Lowering chars on the password will result in loss of appropriate entropy. Lowering space on quantifier will result in weakness against wordlist attacks.
Key Validation:
Calculate balance from public keys. Each created public key is used to calculate if it has a balance on the blockchain. Only the one that has a balance needs to be stored the rest can be deleted.
Difficulty adjustments: Every 4 years it is needed to reset the default rounds of security to match state of the art hashing. This also means to stay backwards compatible. You will have to do both the old default rounds and any new default rounds separately. We start in 2020 with recommended bcrypt cost of 19 (524288 rounds)
Recommended storage time: Since computers become faster over time, the time you store wealth behind such a key needs to be limited. Even so Moore's law makes it predictable when another difficulty adjustment is necessary, the recommendation is to create new keys at least every 4 years (assuming a max security decrease of times 16) and transfer funds to the new keys.
Specialist hardware and parallel computation for recovery: It is possible to build specialized hardware that can perform more hashes per watt/cost than GPUs can. Last FPGAs updates on the topic promise a four times better efficiency and since BCrypt is not memory intensive, it can be further optimized. Compared to CPU performance per Watt GPUs are already yielding about 35 times the efficiency and FPGAs 144 times. If the specialized hardware one day outperforms user equipment at a few magnitudes, as it happened with bitcoin Asic mining, key recovery can be computed in parallel with a cloud computing provider that rents this specialized equipment. This will allow to further harden the difficulty of a brute force with additional rounds in BCrypt but will keep the requirements on the initial key generator to a minimum to match user devices that wont contain specialized hardware. (in other words it is ok if the single key generation on a phone takes a minute if the recovery time can also happen in a minute) The draw back on it is that one day if this hardware exist, key recovery will become increasingly difficult with own hardware and will need the scaled recovery architecture to match performance of an attacker one day.
Awareness of infinite lifetime of keys: Making the keys deterministic also means encryption on anything you send will not stay secure forever.One day even so the elliptic curve cryptography might still not be broken, GPUs, FPGAs or ASICs might be fast enough to brute force to your old key and decrypt your old data. SO DON'T ENCRYPT PRIVATE STUFF WITH IT THAT SHOULD NEVER BE SEEN AGAIN!
Alibaba and the forty thieves: Old stories already hint the way to this encryption scheme. In Alibaba knowing the location and the password: "Open Simsim" was enough to get access to the thieves magic cave, but forgetting only parts of the secret had the severe consequence to be stuck in the hideout. The missing memory on the secret made the hero unsuccessfully brute force through all kinds of possibilities since he forgot to remember the exact password but had still a memory on parts of its entropy which was that it was "Open (a specific grain)". Similar applies with the GeoKeys. Someone trying to recover it from parts of the entropy will have still much higher chances than someone guessing all of it. The location and password was leaked cause the thieves had bad OpSec and revealed the location by opening the secret gate without realizing they were spied at. Same applies to the GeoKeys. If you reveal where you search and what you search for someone might sniff that information and try to brute force faster than you. Your advantage is that other than the thieves you do not have to be physically present to do your search. Map data is more accurate and secure than real time GPS tracking and creation and recovery can happen completely offline.
First use case: Of course this technique might not be secure enough to store millions of $$$ forever behind one key. For smaller amounts and limited time it works out well though. The reason I came up with this is inspired by stories I heard from refugees like my grandparents, losing every tiny bit they had when they were forced to flee from their country. Back then there was no bitcoin and they tried to hide what they had on their bodies. This tool increases the chances of wealth being well hidden from aggressors and recoverable for those in the greatest need.
Other types of implementations: Geo locations are just one way to get to a vague secret. Other implementations are possible as long as they have enough quantification possibilities. In geokeys we use the space abstraction meter to millimeter. This can be replaced with something similar that is easy to remember for a human and comes with the ability to quantify it down to smaller and smaller chunks. One could use a time-date instead of an vague location for example, and to recover brute force down to milliseconds of the exact time of the date the key was created with.
Thanks to my family which is very supportive with my ideas. Thanks to Jochen Mader from Germany for creating the first python poc script. Thanks to Oscar Davids from China for creating the openCL based recovery tool. Thanks to Hashcat for providing state of the art open source brute force technology. Thanks to Marc Cymontkowski and Fredrik Hocke from Germany for helping with the paper. Thanks to red4sec from Spain for guidance on entropy calculations
Philipp Angele 02/2020
Jump to: