Author

Topic: new coin-MIXER - fee only 0.5% (Read 1148 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 522
March 02, 2013, 09:10:37 AM
#16
seems nobody needs this. taken offline. my own tests worked out well,

Now that Blockchain.info have stopped the anonymous tx option with wallets accesed (only) through tor (from like today) I can see a massive market for a new cheap mixer  Wink

Whoa, seriously?

That got amazingly little press. Seems a lot more important a development than CoinScam's deluded prevarications in the grand scheme of things.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
February 27, 2013, 05:31:36 PM
#15
seems nobody needs this. taken offline. my own tests worked out well,

Now that Blockchain.info have stopped the anonymous tx option with wallets accesed (only) through tor (from like today) I can see a massive market for a new cheap mixer  Wink
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 27, 2013, 05:29:23 PM
#14
seems nobody needs this. taken offline. my own tests worked out well,
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 27, 2013, 07:02:25 AM
#13
addr's are now checked.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Weighted companion cube
February 27, 2013, 06:49:50 AM
#12
sure, simply test it with 0.02 BTC.
I'll be losing out 50% on fees, you should work on address validation (it's not hard). At least you're sanitizing user input.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 27, 2013, 06:21:07 AM
#11
sure, simply test it with 0.02 BTC.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Weighted companion cube
February 27, 2013, 12:13:19 AM
#10
Would you be interested in giving me a test mix? I can analyze the taint and anonymity of this mixer. PM me if you are interested.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 26, 2013, 09:32:44 AM
#9
As stated i do not plan to run this myself in the long run.
I only create it and let you guys test it.
If you check my post history you can get a bit of a picture of me.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
February 26, 2013, 09:07:30 AM
#8
well, thats your opinion.
I could be wrong about this, but I don't think that's the most effective way to reassure potential customers that you're not going to run off with their Bitcoins like an uncountable number of similar ventures have in the past.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 26, 2013, 09:02:10 AM
#7
well, thats your opinion.

this is just a field-test of my script, which will later run on my customers server under his brandname and a "real" design.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
February 26, 2013, 08:59:58 AM
#6
No thanks, I don't actually need any coin mixing plus this is pretty shady. Who knows if you're going to run with 1 or 10 or 100 BTC..
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 26, 2013, 08:58:29 AM
#5
coins are from different rotating hot-wallets of established big services, so the coins mix well.
give it a try with 0.02 or more.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
February 26, 2013, 08:56:04 AM
#4
Shady as hell is my first impression.

Are you calculating taint? What is the source of the coins? Etc.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 26, 2013, 08:53:37 AM
#3
well, there is no address-validity check in it yet.
right now the plain function is there.
more advanced features like
*) multiple back-addresses
*) fragmented back-sending
*) delayed back-sending

etc.
are in the works.
legendary
Activity: 2271
Merit: 1363
February 26, 2013, 08:51:35 AM
#2
It would have tried to send me back coins to lkalskdjasdasdasf , i'm not sure if this is an address though..
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
February 26, 2013, 08:30:53 AM
#1
hi.

i am coding a new coin-mixer for a customer.

everybody welcome to test and comment.

http://tinyurl.com/coinmixer

enjoy
Jump to: