question for stunna and players
If we offer higher bankroll then PD and prove it and that it is our own money, not investors like on JD and offer higher faucet without bothering players with levels and children games.
Do you care if design is similar in some ways?
Stunna I did check and no one has filed patent on design or site layout, your's is just plane logic, you did not invent anything. If PD did not exist this my site would look the same as it is the only way that all makes sense, put the game in front of player, in central position.
Just my personal opinions:
I don't care how high a site's BR is, as I'm not wagering multiple coins per spin.
I like sites that have an investment option because it makes me feel like there is a trust factor involved, like they are accountable to many many people. But overall it doesn't matter that much as I never leave a balance on any dice site when I'm not playing.
I don't care about faucets unless they are paying some ridiculous amount (like .0001
BTC+ every minute).
I don't know what you are referring to with "levels and children games". Do you mean captchas? If you are offering a faucet with no captcha, that's very dumb on your part but will endear you to a bunch of
bots very consistent players.
I do care about design because it makes me uneasy to see something that looks like it was taken and not developed. I feel like if you are cutting corners with site design, what else are you willing to cut corners on? These btc gambling games exist primarily on trust, so with so many options out there, if I get a funny feeling about a site, there's no need to risk playing there.
. 
