Topic: New Gambling Site has a Short Signature Campaign (Read 512 times)

Having both would be much preferable which is something a business should considerate on the first place.You can spread up awareness and at the same time it would give out good impression
that your support or staff is active specially into this forum since there are lots of people whom do really actively giving out questions and queries in regarding on the new site.
Speaking about budget for signature campaign then it would vary and some do run out 1 week for some test out but just like the rest been saying
that this wont really be enough.

When I'm hovering to the threads in the gambling section, those that have an active support is likely conversing potential customers and that's why it is an important asset to the casino that can't focus in campaign.

But it is better if they have both of it.

A long running campaign and a support that is conversing with the community, that will change the effect of the result that they're longing to see positively.

When it comes to campaigns of new casinos, they're mostly about initial recognition. The traffic is always the highest in the first few days of displaying a banner, then it slows down and for businesses that run their campaigns for a long time, like the one in my signature, it's more about maintaining the status and showing that they're still doing fine. From the first goal of showing themselves their goal turns more into maintaining a foothold so that the space doesn't get taken over by competition.

I don't think bear market has anything to do with the length of campaigns. Many past campaigns were shutting down in bull markets.

As for merit requirement, don't worry. Sometimes it takes many weeks before you get a campaign but then it can be a year or more before it ends, so if you're a frequent poster it's worth the wait.

Once you do make yourself doesnt have much interaction with the community even having no campaign, being active on your ANN thread would really might do but of course there is really significant differences if we do compare out when you are launching a campaign but we know that not all companies does have the huge budget on running a long term campaign thats why they do really end up on
running 1-2 weeks which majority been saying that it wont really be that enough on seeing positive results.

This is also depending on what kind of site you do have, whether it is really good looking or giving out good games then you do have high chance or odds
on succeeding but of course it wont really be guaranteed as always.

It could be but most likely, they don't see the result that they wanting to have but a week run isn't really enough and will not show the results that they want.

Even there's no bear market, we've seen some campaigns that do have ran only for a week or two and that's unlikely going to hit success. But if they don't like the impact that a campaign they've ran, they should be active at all times and focus on their ANN threads so that the interaction between them and the community remains intact through it.

There can be various reasons to end a campaign early. It is in the beginning on a forum that you are just new and that you want to try out all the possibilities. Maybe many sites underestimate the power of a campaign or maybe it's too big of an impact on the budget. Surely you can expect a starting gambling site to have a budget? After all, they also have to pay out players who win some money. You can make a signature campaign as big or small as you want. All ways of advertising can be helpful for a gambling site. I remember that iitlucy also just run their campaign 1 or 2 weeks.

Very well said by a well known manager on this forum 

This is actually true which these managers do handle up the community on running whether signature campaign or any tasks been giving out that simply connects out with advertisement or exposure.
This wont really guarantee out success or getting players on playing on the site even if you do put up huge budget on signature campaign.
THere are indeed two type of companies which is those small and big ones and things that it connects on it will really be depending or varying
whether running a campaign would be that sensible or just totally a waste of money and time.

Well signature campaigns have been ruthless in people competing for slots and the amount of Hero/Legendary users is slowly creeping up every week - this is hardly a new development. On your original question of how casinos operate, there are all sorts of reasons that might see the collapse of advertising campaigns, however it can often come down to money. It is a very hard market to break into now as there is already plenty of established sites who have accrued regular users and it can be almost impossible to attract their attention. A lot of new casino owners also don't realize how much money is required - not just to do this sort of advertising but paying for things like security when they come under DDOS attacks by people trying to blackmail them. If you cannot keep your site online in that scenario, you're losing vast amounts of money.

The campaign will have to engage on a steady and clear discussion with their intending manager right before the launch of the campaign to fish out some certain things that could be of challenge regarding the signature campaign especially when the Gambling site is a newly launched one, after their interaction then comes the conclusion from the campaign operators, having a tangible result start with the gambling site functionality and services provided, gamblers will definitely give a troll just for viewing sake, but if found interesting they can give a try and with time they remain and stay, campaign managers should serve as a third party between the gambling site and it signature campaign participants and gamblers, relate the appropriation of every necessary updates and goings with the operators, within the space of a month they should begin to see observable traffic to their site and if their financial capacitation is bouyant enough they can continue the campaign because just on this forum alone, millions of people visits it day by day and you can imagine advertising to everyone of them through signature campaign could be an ideal step.

To an extent yes, but when a company contacts you you and that company discuss many things. At least you should IMO. You have the ability to tell a company how you feel about their plan, or you can shut, up tell them what you offer, and get paid. Those that are just looking for a paycheck are not the best managers IMO.

For sure it was, was here during the ICO Age and lot of signature campaigns are about ICO and once the bear market hits 2018 the signature campaigns tend to decrease as well. This was for sure the thing with other casinos especially if they aren't visited by gamblers compare to those who are still having huge operations.

Signature campaign managers just obey what their employer told them to do though so it's not a guarantee that it will last long or the company he/she working will be operating for weeks or months, it's not like that.

The allocation of a signature campaign in crypto gambling depends on whether the crypto casino has many players who deposit their money on the gambling platform. Of course, the bigger the money coming in, the bigger the allocation that the casino owner will give to the person they will promote their website platform to.

Now if Hampuz manages a signature campaign, the real battle for the participants will be the Merit contest, whoever has the top highest merit has the best chance of being accepted in the signature campaign, those with the lowest merit will lose, and in we can't do anything about that because those are Hampuz's rules and criteria.

Thanks for another detailed explanation. Precisely that is what all Campaign managers should think about. Campaign managers should ask casinos about their Bankroll and their promotion plans. How long they are on the market, and what do they expect from this campaign? If their expectation is too high, You have to explain how it works and why they should/shouldn't run the campaign now.

Moreover, I believe most casinos don't want to reveal their bank roll. Especially when it's low, but they pretend it's pretty much high. So, If they don't share their plan with you, it will be a challenging job for you, but the ultimate loss is theirs.

---

BTW, It will be good if you can add this post to your service thread, so you don't have to explain them every time. Your potential clients should be aware of that.

No new casino is going to get the traffic they hope for by running a 1 week campaign here on bitcointalk. Let's say for example that I open a casino with a $50,000 bankroll. I decide to run a signature campaign for 1 week and spend $1000. I have just flushed 2% of my bankroll down the toilet because I am a moron and thought a signature campaign would bring me 1000's of new users.

I am not 1 of these desperate managers that will lie to a client and let them think a campaign is an awesome idea just so I get paid. I would rather see a casino do some smaller giveaways, free spin promos, review promos, or something smaller trying to work on their reputation vs waste money on a formula that will never work no matter who the manager is.

Now with all that said, a signature campaign is not a complete waste of money at all. You just cannot expect people to toss their money into something that is not proven right away. A company needs to build a reputation. A company needs to make sure their ToS is not completely ridiculous. A company needs to show that they plan on being around for a long time and that if you the consumer give them a chance, you will have a fun experience. Consumers also need to know that if they decide to trust a site and make a deposit, they will get paid. Of course you the consumer needs to read the ToS and make sure you can comply before making said deposit.

If a company has a decent bankroll and wants to come out aggressive with a signature campaign along with small promotions basically hitting the ground running, then I welcome those casinos to drop me a message and let's get to work building a name for yourselves. If you are a small company with a small bankroll, don't consider a signature campaign up front without establishing yourself so as you aren't wasting your money.

I can advise you and help you build a reputation, but I cannot force people to play on your site.

Well, Most new casinos start the Signature campaigns after they get suggestions from the campaign managers. The casinos expect an instant result and want to run the campaign for two or three weeks to test the effect. I don't think every casino is Running their signature campaign just because of the traffic they get from Bitcointalk. Stablished Casinos want to maintain their reputation as well. Most of the new casinos don't focus on that.

Recently I noticed yahoo62278 is not interested in running such campaigns for one week or two which is good.

Not sure, most casino campaigns are paid in dollar value and maybe they do that for other types of marketing out there as well like banner ads. I guess they have a special management for promotion and marketing funds that won't be much affected by the overall market effect.

Maybe just postponing the marketing for now to save some BTC funds.

It could be if the marketing personnel is just cost-cutting for the marketing. For example, they are paying about 0.003BTC for $60 per week, but if there is a bullrun he could just be paying 0.002 for the same $60/week. Meaning he saves 0.001BTC per week. Does sound like an awesome plan still.

The bear market may also have played a significant role in the finances of casinos as gamblers might have also been affected by the falling market but I think many of these new casinos that only financed short signature campaigns here are simply providing a very limited budget.

Or perhaps upon their assessment their 1 to 2 weeks of exposure here didn't amount to enough new players. Of course 2 weeks of signature here may not really be enough. But perhaps these companies just want to see a considerable effect to their business only after that short period of time.

I thought maybe the casinos had their own promotion plans so they decided to stop their signature campaign. Or it could be that they want to see how people react because I think if they see good results, they will continue to promote using signature campaigns. Or it could be that this bear market impacts their finances but we don't know what their plans are. Besides, if they had other plans, they would do something to provide further information in their ANN.

I absolutely agree with you. We shouldn't expect any results from the new signaturr campaign after a week or two. If a new casino wants to attract players to their gaming floor, they can specify in the rules of the signature campaign that the rewards will be paid to the casino's account for all members of the signature campaign. Many of the forum members play gambling and in my opinion this option is great for gaining first reviews of a gambling site.

A signature campaign is a part of marketing promotion. if some of the channels do not bring benefits, then you stop investing in that type of advertising.
as far as I have noticed, signature campaigns bring a more tangible result only after a long period. it takes time and constant presence to become recognizable, and for that, you need a slightly bigger budget and patience.
all the short-lived campaigns are expected more in the few first weeks, although this is difficult to achieve, especially in the gambling industry where the competition is huge.

As a participant, I don't understand if the arguments are necessary, but I think casino marketing on the forum can last depending on several conditions. It could be money, it could be that their expectations were high and the result wasn't appealing to them, or they could change their marketing strategy because, as I've observed, some casinos don't only advertise here on the forum, they have other places they advertise just to get more users into their platforms

Bitcoinchair.com for example do advertise casino on their explorer and I have seen Roobet several times, even 1xbit(_scam) and the same Fairspin people are debating is still right there advertising as you can see from the image below.

As you can see in the image below,Bitcoinchair.com, for instance, does advertise casinos on their explorer. I have seen Roobet multiple times as well as 1xbit (_{a fraud}) and the same Fairspin users are arguing.



So, as I have stated, it is their choice whether to continue or not, but gambling will always exist regardless of the crypto market, it is the users who are no longer earning much from crypto and have all come to signature hunting, which is now diluted with many people, limited campaigns, and plenty applications.

No because even in Bull market you can see crypto gambling campaign ended early as well, so the market trend doesn’t affect the campaign of a project since it will depends on them on how much is their budget for that particular campaign. Though I see that most of the top site today still have their long signature campaign, and it’s really good for them since they are still in business and they really have a good budget on their marketing campaign which I think is the reason why they are successful today.

I don't really know were your question is directly going to but i must say Truly the bear market have affected all angles of crypto casinos and only those gambling site that has been established for long might or would only survived it to run a signature campaign because, come to think of it those gambling sites that was launched within 2020/21 when bitcoin were high can online have little volume of bitcoin to pay for marketing dip affected all. Know too well that in every dip people always risk little amount of bitcoin out there while most people keeps buying since they don't know what would happened next while most people have it in mind for bitcoin to get $100k.

Every company or business will test the different marketing strategies to see what is the most effective. If they launch a signature campaign on the forum and they do not get enough new customers signing up for their service or casino, it will not help them to continue with that method of marketing.

The post covid period are very tough for many of these businesses, so the marketing budget is very limited and they are forced to pick the method that render the best result. 

I'm not sure, but I think it won't quite affect their budget allocated for the signature campaign as they're allocating Btc. Though they might spend more fractions of Btc compared when Btc is in a higher price, but the same goes when someone uses their platform and deposit their crypto.

The huge difference would be for the budget allocated to run the business long term and the willingness for the owner to risk more budget to promote the website.
You won't expect to get good result with a limited capital in a market where competitions are air tight. Most gambling websites offers common and unique bonuses and rewards to attract more users.

If the sig campaign won't work for them, then for sure the problem would be on how they run their promotions. That means, it is less attractive offer than the other online casinos.

I think this bear market lasted too long than overall expected duration. This was mainly caused by global markets. American Dollar crashed anything its against. Covid, War, Gas crisis, inflation... These were all huge issues to be solved. And after all, gambling sites probably also have issue with money. People tend to save their money for regular expenses in such times like this. So signature campaigns may last shorter than usual.

evaluation in short time won't bring them any good result because how could you expect a gambler trusted you when they can see that you have a limited budget in running your advertising?
in which I believe not as effective as they wanted the result.
yes that is possibilities as we have seen some site that tries to run campaign and stopped shortly but after couple of months or even a year comes back with bigger campaign and stays till now , Like what they did .

The signature is run to test the waters first,if the feedback is good,meaning the sites get a lot of new users signing up from the signature links then most probably they will extend it further.While the signature not being the only way to advertise a crypto casino,I think that the signature is the better of any other form of advertisements because it is run in the most lived crypto space which is exactly this forum here.Rarely I have seen more people interested in crypto outside of this forum,there are other sites who promote crypto casinos but they cannot be compared with our forum.

If we are in a bear or bull market it does affect, because in a bull market even a fool makes money as long as he doesn't screw up.

In a bear market like now, there is less money circulating and companies are limited to allocate the money they have available to what is necessary to continue providing the servica and not have to close.


Has it ever occurred to you that in a bear market advertising is not as effective? In a situation like the one we are in, the return on investment tends to be lower than when the economy is booming, not just in this sector, but in general.

So yes, the bear market does affect signature campaigns, the new ones tend to last less because of the economic situation.

When we are in a bull market there are more signature campaigns available and they last longer.

I'm not sure if this is the main reason but one thing I am sure about that it is not how the campaign distinguish the effect , most of the gambling sites that expect faster result ends up closure meaning either they have lack of funds? or they have lack of trust in bitcointalk user in which the main target here.
there are several gambling site that runs longer even without advertising in this forum so i think it is their own reason why they don't last long.
as it has been tackled so many times before? that the effect should be at least 2-5 months before finally expect a best result.
if after that range of time yet there are no valid response ? then that means one thing that People around here don't really trust that said site.

I guess it depends on the budget of the casino itself, not if we are in the bear or bull market. There are also times that the casino itself will pause the campaign ans gauge everything and think whether they want to continue or not. As far as a I can remember though, Fairspin has been in the crypto gambling industry since 2018 so they are not new, maybe as I have said, make some changes and decided to come back with a brand new signature campaign.

Of course competition are tough, but I think everyone can get a pie of a the pie, it's a billion dollar industry, and it is a niche. So everyone will have to developed it's own strategy.

Agreed, i don't know why OP must always use bearish trend as a reason for signature campaign to be ran in a short time. The team behind gambling platforms are actively monitoring the result from the campaign. We know that there are so many people who actively playing gambling in this forum and it's also crypto related forum which makes the sites seems pretty easy to attract them to visit their sites and try their platforms.

The problem is if it's not always a new site that promoting in this forum must always get a good result from their marketing efforts

Not really imo. Crypto in the first place is simply a medium, I don't think it's volatility would be a huge thing for casinos since they still receive and reward strictly the same percent every time a player gambles (unless they reward the winners later, which doesn't happen afaik). I just think it's a matter of testing out the casino/campaign and looking at the results that it brings for that short amount of time.

Some of the old campaigns last long because they've either decided it was worth it for the long run, or with that short-term test they did decide that it would be worth the money and effort to continue doing it imo.
 I'd think it's dependent on the casino themselves, so it's different from each casino? A case-by-case basis so to speak. It also depends if they pay depending on rank, on number of posts, as well as the number of members they're willing to accept.

It's all up to the casino's funding for the marketing campaign. It could be that they are starting a campaign somewhere else like the adnetwork.
Sometimes when the campaign doesn't give results due to the competition for space in the forum, it's the bigger casinos that eats those new casino coming into the game.

The winner takes it all and the loser has to fall. It's from a popular song by the way which is kind of a gambler's theme.

Is there even a specific price range matrix that campaigns should follow for us to determine if the allocation for the signature campaign is low or not?

The bear market has nothing to do with the campaign rates in most cases. If the site just stated a budget for a campaign, then that's their budget. The campaign manager will now propose their campaign structure on that budget or something along those lines.

A signature campaign in this forum is only one of their ways to promote their gambling platfomr. If they feel that it is enough, they may stop it, not know for only a while or forever. However, at least, they have introduced their platform tot he members here.
In promotion, there are also some consideration whether their adv is successful or not. They have certain data that show how many visitors or new users coming because they know the adv from this forum. And also have the data from other promotion sites or ways. That is why they make certain decisions.
Related tot his current bear market, this may give impact, but as long as they are still operating and doing well, I ma not sure that this s the main reason.

It's possible but the I think the chances of this happening is quite slim. They could cut their campaign here but I doubt they would really cut the funds for ads. Maybe they just chose to reallocate the money to other platforms or promotions that generates more leads.

casinos have their own reasons why they are stopping their campaigns for certain period of time. some are saying that they are not getting much traffic despite of the campaign, or there's no improvement with their revenue. so if a site is just a small one, they will stop it to avoid further losses in terms of their income. because paying the sig campaign is a negative income to their site. though we can say, the impact of campaign can't be seen in just couple of weeks of running it, but usually these casinos can't afford to have their losses much longer.

Actually, there is no need to be surprised by gambling sites that carry out short campaigns, currently the competition in the crypto online gambling business is really big, many of which only have a small marketing budget. so I see that they only do campaigns with short durations

btw, some time ago I saw several crypto gambling sites that closed their operations for reasonable reasons, intense competition makes gambling sites that are slow in marketing and also have poor service, have to lose in the competition

I personally believe that it would make sense if this bear market affects the finances of casinos, if they kept much of their funds in Bitcoin or other fluctuating cryptocurrency. Also, let us keep in mind that during these down markets people are trying to cover their realized and unrealized losses, leaving less room for gambling, the casinos know this hence their adjust their advertising budget and wait for a better season to continue with their campaigns.

Every firm have an allocation for the promotion. At times they weren't able to stick to the plans based on the market and the revenue. In recent days I saw a gambling platform that had its signature campaign running for few weeks, but all of the sudden it announced its closure within few months. Later came to know about the reason as lack of revenue. I think the platform was dragoncoin or something like that.

When you said both gambling sites did not last long it has a different meaning altogether. When it comes to signature campaigns it is their choice whether they want to conduct a campaign or want to spend money any other way.

Campaign managers decide those stipulation, you can be active in Development & Technical Discussion and Bitcoin Technical Support if you are looking for merits  .

We all know the market is down I think this is really affecting the new gambling website, most of the signature campaigns that have been running even during the bear market are not new gambling site, they have been here for long time, even with the bear market they are able to maintain their signature campaign, but I think it's difficult for the new gambling site. Getting a signature campaign now is kind of competitive, but I know market will bounce back soon, actually nobody knows when it will be bounce back but am sure it will be soon and new gambling sites will be able to market here again.

I think that a legendary member should know better in the issues about signature campaigns going off within the short time and beyond the expectations of promoters to stay longer. Most times new casinos try to find a way to bring their services to the forum even if they run for a week, they might have achieved a kind of awareness and they may decide to shut down the campaign and use other medium of publication.



Yes this is the simple fact about it. If they are starting up they may intentionally open a campaign for few weeks while they taste run the traffic generated via budget for the campaign and if they are not making satisfactory profit then they can go down. There are some that run for just a week and go off for like a month, I think Hhampuz managed such campaign in the past, blender.io. Also some test run and continue for a while like blackjack just to mention few. It is about choice, decision to budget and traffic that goes to the casino.

I don't think it's the bear market but the effect of the campaign itself. Those casinos are looking for fast effect that they want to evaluate just after running for weeks.
But, that's not how it goes because campaigns should be run for a long term for them to see how effective it is. Because if it's just for a few weeks of run, there's barely effect on it and members will easily forget about them.

Bear market has nothing to do with their marketing strategy, and I think the gambling itself has limit their budget for marketing and maybe the competition is very tough for signature campaign and that’s why they ended it early since the result is not good for them. The merit has been one of the requirement to qualify and we cannot blame this to the site or manager if we don’t have much merit, again if you want to participate with those signature campaign, try to earn more merit.

Some companies do test out to run some campaign as this was mostly been suggested by most people on this forum whenever there's a new gambling site around or do have their ANN threads which
this would be the main recommendation when it comes to marketing which it wont really be that a bad idea considering that this place has a good crypto traffic.Some do allocate big and some
wouldnt and just ran 1 week for some test up or  a little bit more.As for qualifications then its on managers call on whom to accept and its just common sense that having huge
merit number or count would always be having advantage compared to those who do have less.

Not necessarily in all cases. Some of them have a list of marketing strategy already planned and try them out one by one to see the one with the most yielding result. So it may just be that the signature campaigns on their list of planned marketing strategy is not the most effective (Most effective meaning, it can be effective, but not the most effective), hence the need to suspend the campaigns and focus on the other methods giving the best results.

There have been more gambling sites that have run a very short campaign. There could be various reasons why they didn't go through. Still, I think it can do some damage to a site's image. Then it might be even more convenient not to run a campaign at all if you have such plans or if your budget is not sufficient. However, there are also campaigns that have been active for a long time. I'm active in the 1xbit campaign myself, and they've had their campaign on the forum for almost a year if I'm not mistaken. There are multiple sites that have long campaigns. Of course it costs a considerable budget.

Perhaps it's the budget that they really wanted to allocate for advertising and nothing else. They launch, they want to get their platforms recognized, and when they think that the exposure is enough, they cut the signature campaign. There are tons of gambling platforms and other crypto services that has had their signature campaigns last for only a couple of weeks, but they are still thriving. Advertising your service is one thing, and maintaining it to stay competitive in this game is another. Or they assessed that signature campaigns here in the forum is not the way to go in advertising and there are other channels that they can use. Lots of reasons honestly, but I don't think the bear market has got something to do with it heavily, as this was always the case even during bull markets.

Actually the campaign was very low for now and bear market is some how reason for the less campaign now.When the people think about the bounty campaign,only few are trusted and most of them are fake.They just using people for the fake work.After couple of months,they send the dummy token.Which is not at all the useful one.People only allow others to learn from the mistakes.But mistakes are not a accidental one,it’s also the real one for now.

there are several cases where I've seen a project that also held a signature campaign event but stopped, usually they complain about the traffic getting from the signature campaign is not in line with the target that's why they switch to using other campaigns outside this forum in other ways, maybe that's what happened not only that we were in a bear market

I'm referring to sources I've read.


I am not referring to Software, Services, Casino Game Developers, Licenses as well as Payment Support, I speak as I know and as I have read.

The bottom line: online gambling customers bet regardless of the value, does not affect the gambling site, loyal customers and the most surviving gambling sites, simple reason, money rotates every second, thus gambling sites can operate a little longer with above average money rounds, the target is achieved.

Most of the time projects and casinos often run for a few weeks is mainly because they've evaluated it as not effective which in fact could be correct especially signature campaigns are more effective on the long run.

Other reason could also be that casinos and other projects hold or end their campaign as they are only trying to test things out. Another possible reason is that funds are much more needed on other sectors or department from which they cut off the budget for advertisements.

Even during the bull market signature campaigns were already scarce, limited and restricted. Maybe recently the competition just got more fierce due to the weak market's conditions, but without any doubts that is a existing problem since a long time ago. Moreover it's a demand and supply issue like in any other niche of jobs' market. Each new day more people get aware about bitcoin and cryptocurrency, being lead to this forum, so they discover signature campaigns and want to join them for extra income, while at same time the supply of new campaigns don't grow on the same proportion, therefore there aren't spots for everyone.

In general, people are facing similar situations on every fields they try to look for a job. That is the proof of disorganized and irresponsible population growth impacting daily life. There are too many people in the world for few jobs' spots. The ones who are able to get those spots are fine, but for the rest there is only misery and pain.

We can slightly assume the bearish season to have some impact on the longevity of a signature campaign but nevertheless tlwe must not forget that each campaign also have their own stipulated budget for carrying out a signature campaign and once they've got to the limit of this amount budgeted the campaign tend to stop, we can compare a particular casino gambling campaign with another because thier financial standings are entirely different from each other.


One thing most participant failed to understand is that they can't be the ones to dictate for the campaign manager, that's why they are called managers, you can't guess right the criteria used for the acceptance of a member but onky because that of the required merits is open to everyone to see, come to think of this, having a good number of Merits is actually a first indication that the user is a consistent quality poster with 120 days, secondly check by yourself the spreadsheet or trust dice campaign thread as see a number of participants accepted with lower merits especially on the sr member participants, did you asked yourself was it because of the merit they were accepted? Obviously no, the campaign manager have the insight to detect even those actually been active, regular and quality poster but with low Merits and consider them, also you can have a high number of Merits and ended up not being accepted because not everyone understands how to spread post across relevant boards required and not just posting only on a particular board consistently over time, i advise you leave the campaign managers to exercise their role base on the requirements of the gambling site team representative demands.

Most of the times, this is the reason. Casinos always have high expectations from the signature campaign while signature campaign is a long term marketing campaign which they don't want to understand.

OP, I don't think this is the right place to post it. You can move the post to service discussion instead. Also, you are giving free advertisement to bluechip which can be another reason.

No, this is not related at all. The campaign mentioned above does have a short duration, before that there has also been a gambling site campaign that has a short duration. I don't know the reason why the Campaign was stopped on the first and second Sundays, but that's the truth.
It all depends on each site, how long they want to hold the Campaign.

It's the casino's prerogative to stop their signature campaign for their own reason. There are lots of factors while some casinos only run their campaign for just a short period. It could be because of their limited budget or the ineffectiveness of the signature campaign on their site. There are still lots of highly reputable casinos that run their campaign for years and that simply means that a a signature campaign has a huge positive impact on the continuous success of their site.

Fairspin is known for doing short campaign period due to limited budget and I believe its same with the Bluechip and other casino that has a short term campaign. The bear market is not the reason to blame for this since there's still a lot of signature campaign that still running in long term regardless the market condition.

I'm certain that this scenario is due to limited funds of the casino that allocated on there campaign here since the payment is huge for a startup casino to maintain the campaign running for long term while getting only minimal result due to tough competition.

This could be right, they are just probably seeing how the result would be upon applying what casinos does in marketing the casino in the biggest crypto forum.
They could be back in the campaign soon once they tried other marketing strategy. If they find out the signature campaign in the forum works better than the others campaigns they are doing, they might just put more allocation for sig campaign.

Casino doing a signature campaign in bitcointalk earns trust from the community which could be what they are evaluating for now.

Short or long term signature campaign running for several gambling casino site depend on

• Budget allocated

Could be there with several short casino gambling signature campaign have lower budget and they running few weeks only

• Not effective

Seems after one or two weeks campaign signature running still not impact with gambling casino without any new member or old member active wager.

• evaluate with other advertising kinds

Maybe gambling casino owner try with several kinds advertising their casino, looking which one have more traffic with advertising as signature campaign or advertising as other way like social media promotion until influencer trough Youtube channel.

I doubt it's the case since we've seen other casino campaigns that lasted longer and like what panjul said they probably want to make the most out of their budget which is understandable and if it doesn't work out it's better to stop it and look for other ways of promoting their casino as other casino campaigns have done before. I just think that it's likely they have other reasons to not continue the campaign aside from the bear market when you look at it in their position.

I thought I'm the only one who noticed this, but its the management's decision to stop or continue the campaign, they have the stat so they  know what action to take to continue or stop the campaign, either they want to test a short campaign and will come back in the future with a longer one,  I have seen that happen on Blackjack.fun, or it did not reach their expectation and opted not to add additional fund for the campaign,
A signature campaign is still the best form of advertising it will not just die and the top casinos knows the importance of a continuous campaign through a signature campaign.

There can be some various reasons why some casinos did short campaign only such as:

• Limited budget so they can do it for few weeks only
• Evaluation shows that the campaign is not effective for them, this reason can be because many other reasons
• Too much expectation from the owner to get quick effects from the campaign, it disappoint the owner so they decided to stop after 1-2 weeks

Coming up to the bear market, I do not think it affects directly because I think every casino knows how to allocate their funds.

Allocation is very important and additional allocation very much depends on the result of the campaign, for the campaign to have a good result it should be a minimum of one month campaign, let's admit it, the competition is very stiff in the casino industry, and those who can keep up with marketing will have the trust and edge against casinos that are not buying ads or launching a signature campaign, I don't think the bear market have an impact on the marketing gamblers will continue gambling the money keeps flowing in, if casinos cannot sustain a long campaign it's their decision if I am running a casino I definitely would like to have an ongoing campaign, branding, and visibility is always the key to gain new players.

Yo @OP Fairspin and Bluechip signature campaign was launched on the bear market, it's not like they was launched signature campaign when Bitcoin still worth $69K and then the next 6 days Bitcoin price sharply dump into $20K. So I'm not quite sure what the point you're trying to say since the Bitcoin price almost not changed when they launch their own campaign.

I think they just think if signature campaign is a bad advertisement and there's no progress for them, while we're know signature campaign is the best advertisement in this forum and you need to launch it for long term.

One of the main reason as why new casino only run for a few weeks such as those that you've mentioned is that they are just trying to run a test campaign. This is quite normal especially that signature campaign isn't the only way to promote or advertise their platform. It is also a good thing as these signature campaign are recommended by various gamblers, bounty hunters, investors and other users in which they follow through. These campaigns usually comes back especially when the test campaign has provided good traffic and attracted users to their platform.

Bear market surely affect their finances however not in such a way that it will hinder them too much but in case it did, they'll surely prioritize the least functional.

so the advantage of gambling sites is only in betting and marketing signature campaigns to attract forum members to bet and try their gambling websites. and bear markets have little effect on gambling sites.


It makes sense, because every gambling site has a trial budget so they can measure how many visitors are using their gambling site after doing a signature campaign on bitcointalk. If it has a big impact, it is not impossible that it will continue to run signature campaigns like other long-running signature campaigns such as Freebitcoin and several other campaigns.

Lucky if you have joined a signature campaign that has been running for a long time and with consistent payouts.

It seems to me that it is not surprising that some signature campaigns end quickly, and some last a very long time. It is quite possible that the owners of gambling sites explore the market promotion changing their strategies and this is quite normal because only in comparison can you understand what kind of promotion more profitable.

If we talk about the state of the market, now many companies reduce not only payments but also reduce workers. So we wait for a bull market and try to worry less.

Team is always evaluating the result from the signature campaign. In my opinion if a signature campaign that has been running by a popular site will be going ever longer due to the numerous factors

The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.

I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.

I do not think so- most campaign signatures of gambling websites provide only a limited number of allowance allocated to it to necessarily "test the market." Again, the more members they recruit, the more chances of their gambling website being advertised across this forum.

In adherence to this situation, this is also the reason on why there are also some gambling websites that have an initial budget only planned for let's say 2 weeks, but they suddenly extended their campaign signature for more than 10 weeks due to the sudden boost of players after the "testing period" on the campaign.

Although the bear market has had a slight impact on some crypto-related websites, for example gambling sites, but I don't think that's the single factor that affects those gambling sites in terms of their assets.

I've seen several discussions about gambling site assets. For me, gambling assets are very influential on visitors, this is also not much different from online gambling sites in general, whether or not gambling sites have been campaigning on this forum or advertise on foreign websites, I think the influence of visitors is to bet, not based on the bear market, the bear market only affects the value, but not the nominal bet, no.

For this reason, many gambling sites today are implementing the best features to attract visitors.

But there are other gambling casino signature campaigns that are running for months and years, and they still continue even in the bear market. Also bear market should not have much impact on gambling activities as the price of bitcoin is not directly related to people gambling and betting. They will continue to gamble and bet anytime.

I think this is more related to individual gambling sites as for how long they want to run the campaign, how much it was beneficial to them and also the funds they have allocated for marketing.

Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign  Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.

Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.

With the end of several signature campaigns, the competition is getting tougher. As in the Trus Dice campaign, which was managed by Hhampuz, only a few hours after it was opened, many people applied. and for sure those who have the most merit in the last 120 have a chance to be accepted. while those of us who are only able to collect a few merits are sometimes always eliminated and do not get a place.