Author

Topic: New York State Rockland County Bans Unvaccinted Kids From All Public Places (Read 1010 times)

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
One of the most juicy hypothesis about this is that it was the subject of some of the 'deepest' and most advanced forms of propaganda.  That would also imply that it is one of the highest priority projects of those who control the levers of propaganda.

I'll be honest and say that in spite of spending a fair amount of energy entertaining this hypothesis and looking for evidence, I really have not found anything which accounts for the strength which which people hold the aforementioned contradictory belief structure.  Propaganda is a vast field though, and it guards it's secrets fairly well.  The hypothesis has certainly not been killed by anything I've noticed.

It is not that complicated. It is a combination of fear, cognitive dissonance, and as usual the human need to feel accepted. Fear sells the vaccine. A combination of fear of looking at the horrible truth and cognitive dissonance causes people to ignore the reality of the situation. Finally just to top it off, if anyone manages to work past these two points, the fear of being ostracized keeps people's mouths shut. Additionally since people see anyone not joining the herd to be jabbed as a threat to their health, they treat any dissenters as a direct threat to their own lives. As a result, anyone who does make it through these blocks, speaks, and manages to be heard, is simply labeled as a "antivaxer" shunned as a loon, and ignored at best.

Even if you believe in a soul, at the end of the day that soul still resides in a meatship, and like any machine, the brain can be hacked or broken. No one really likes to think of themselves as a meat puppet, but at the end of the day that is what they manage to turn us all into to one degree or another. Of course people find more comfort in denying this reality than looking the horrible truth in the face. They call it "paying attention" for a reason, because it costs. Consciousness is a burden.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 2073
In Russia there lives a very interesting man, German Sterligov, who went to live in the hinterland and is building his settlement there. Many people consider him crazy, but watching his video it becomes clear that he leads a healthy lifestyle and encourages others to live in the same way. His family has completely abandoned the use of genetically modified foods and they are fully providing healthy food for themselves.

According to his hypothesis, the vaccine is a means that will destroy the population. He speaks openly about it and urges people not to get vaccinated.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
A few of the parents should get together and contest this, comparing it to the 1st Amendment that allows people to go from point A to point B unhindered... and in public btw.

The comparison should also be included, where somebody seriously compares the dangers of unvaccinated against vaccinated, and the injury being done by government breaking their oath of office to uphold the Constitution (and Amendments) vs kids exercising their right to travel.

All this in court (trial by jury) with several expert witnesses and peer reviewed papers where necessary.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
My favorite part of all of this hysteria and impotent rage is pretty much everyone agrees the US healthcare system is corrupt to the core, and regularly turns the population into lab rats for testing and pushing dangerous drugs. Then these same people turn around and implicitly trust this same system to be able to forcibly inject everyone with vaccines without informed consent, and with these companies holding absolutely zero liability over any harm caused. Not a contradiction at all. What could go wrong?

One of the most juicy hypothesis about this is that it was the subject of some of the 'deepest' and most advanced forms of propaganda.  That would also imply that it is one of the highest priority projects of those who control the levers of propaganda.

I'll be honest and say that in spite of spending a fair amount of energy entertaining this hypothesis and looking for evidence, I really have not found anything which accounts for the strength which which people hold the aforementioned contradictory belief structure.  Propaganda is a vast field though, and it guards it's secrets fairly well.  The hypothesis has certainly not been killed by anything I've noticed.

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
My favorite part of all of this hysteria and impotent rage is pretty much everyone agrees the US healthcare system is corrupt to the core, and regularly turns the population into lab rats for testing and pushing dangerous drugs. Then these same people turn around and implicitly trust this same system to be able to forcibly inject everyone with vaccines without informed consent, and with these companies holding absolutely zero liability over any harm caused. Not a contradiction at all. What could go wrong?
sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 262
Now it is coming back to bite them because the vaccinated people have less resistance to the SARS2 coronavirus! These people who pushed for this law are now high risk!
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
This whole push for compulsory vaccinations over the past year wasn't a coincidence. In before they start mandating vaccinations for the CCP virus before you can travel, go to work, or leave your homes.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  Angry

...

It was?

Darn, I need to read up on the rights and laws and stuff more often!
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

The pattern continues.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.

Ah ha, the govt got to you, this is exactly the reaction they were expecting when they tested this news to the public, they expected that people will come up with the statement you just made but not realizing that this Unvaccinated kids has been walking free and never infected anyone, the immune system works in different ways but then again this is not about the sick kids but the govt control over us, that's all, vaccine or not
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Now we see that there has never been any swine flu epidemic... not even close.


Swine Flu Vaccine Injury Settlements Reveal Health Authorities & Big Pharma Are Partners In Crime



CBS News reported that the decision to stop counting H1N1 flu cases was made so hastily that states weren't given the opportunity to provide input. Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dug into state-by-state numbers of positively-confirmed swine flu cases, but she and her CBS team were stonewalled by the CDC for months. Finally, rather than wait for the CDC, reporters took the initiative to contact each state individually and found: "Of the presumed likely swine flu cases, only a fraction of them were actually swine flu."

...

Was there ever a swine flue epidemic?

There was not even the hint of one.

What is provided here is a case study of  Vaccine criminality in which the product is hyped and sold to the corporations benefit.  However all the damage is paid by the State including much of the legal cost.  Corporate bankruptcy needs to be imposed to end this horror.

Ye all the rules have been rigged to run out another fraud any time they like.

Swine Flu Vaccine Injury Settlements Reveal Health Authorities & Big Pharma Are Partners In Crime


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
It's fear. Big Pharma is constantly introducing fear just to make us flee to them for safety. But they have false safety. If you want to get something directly into your bloodstream, try sublingual. Way safer and works better, and can be done without Big Pharma.

Go to the article, and click the links for proof and lots more info.


Getting the Measles in Modern-Day America--Not Nearly as Dangerous as Portrayed



With these improvements, the death rates from childhood infectious diseases plummeted—long before the advent of vaccines for those illnesses. U.S. vital statistics affirm that the measles mortality (death) rate had dropped 99.4% before introduction of the first measles vaccine in 1963.

… even a death rate of 1 in 10,000 cases does not accurately reflect the situation for the majority of the population, for whom measles mortality was far less.

Fuzzy measles math

Prior to the measles vaccine's U.S. introduction, the estimated number of measles cases annually was between 4 and 6.5 million (depending on the source). The government-reported mortality rate—pre-vaccine—was approximately 1 in 10,000 cases. So why do today's media often report it as 1 in 1,000 cases? This appears to be an attempt to exaggerate the facts and promote fear to drive the vaccine mandate agenda. Ninety percent or more of all measles cases were so mild that they were never reported because parents never took their children to the doctor. Only 10% of overall cases were severe enough to warrant seeking medical care, but even in that subgroup, not all cases were reported. It was only among the 10% that sought medical care and were reported that the fatality rate was about 1 in 1,000. Modern news outlets get away with inaccurately reporting the death rate as 1 in 1,000 by leaving out the crucial word "reported" and referring only to "cases."

But even a death rate of 1 in 10,000 cases does not accurately reflect the situation for the majority of the population, for whom measles mortality was far less. Socioeconomic factors are very important in this discussion but often overlooked. In the middle of the last century, U.S. children living in poverty had poorer nutrition, less sanitary living conditions and less access to medical care. As one might expect, this resulted in less viable and resilient immune systems that made them more vulnerable to measles complications and death.

Two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) studies support the observation that poorer children suffered more serious complications and a higher measles mortality rate. One study, titled "Measles mortality: a retrospective look at the vaccine era" (authored for the CDC's Bureau of Epidemiology and published in 1975 in the American Journal of Epidemiology), reviewed statistics from 1958-1963. A 1980 study from the CDC's Immunization Division, titled "Measles mortality in the United States 1971-1975" and published in the American Journal of Public Health, reviewed records from 1971-1975. Both studies showed that children who lived at or below the poverty level, and especially in rural settings, were significantly more likely to die from measles than those in the higher income brackets. In fact, the second study found a ten times (1,000%) higher death rate for those below the poverty level than for the more affluent population.

As I thought about those numbers and the 1000% greater incidence of death in poverty-stricken children, I became curious as to how disproportionate those numbers might be when considering the population as a whole. Remember, the overall mortality rate for the entire country was reported as approximately 1 death for every 10,000 cases of measles. In the pre-measles-vaccine era from 1959-1962, the total U.S. population was from 178 million (1959) to 189 million (1963), and the percentage of families living at or below the poverty level was about 8% (approximately 14 million). If that 8% had a 1,000% higher mortality rate than the more affluent population, it would stand to reason that the mortality rate for that affluent segment must be far less than 1 in 10,000 cases. Here are the CDC measles mortality numbers for 1971-1975 reported in the American Journal of Public Health:

-Families with incomes of less than or equal to $5,000/year: 1 death in 237,467 (population)

-Families with incomes between $5,000 and $10,000/year: 1 death in 1,009,437 (population)

-Families with incomes over $10,000/year: 1 death in 2,190,837 (population)

In other words, for higher-income households, there was less than a one in two million measles fatality rate.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276

One of my favorite informants, Doreen Dotan, is an unabashed Kabbalist who lives in Israel.  Her inexplicable honesty was responsible for my early exposure to Kabbalistic philosophy and subsequent research verified a lot of what she was saying.  She strongly hinted that some of her relatives were involved in cooking up biological nasties to further the cause.

It seems to me a reasonable hypothesis that some of these people do have some insider information and are aware of the philosophy that even some of the 'chosen' people will have to 'take one for the team.'  In other words they are not wild about being the next 'sacrificial burnt offerings' (the translation of 'holocaust').

Some of these Hasidim may indeed pack up and 'make aliyah'.  That might even be part of the design.

Indeed I'm personally doing something similar and this crazy vaccination programing is a significant part of the reason why.  Being a goy I'm not invited to go to Israel of course, and would not go there even if I were a Jew.

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
...
I wonder if Ebola has an outbreak in the US they will still be blaming "antivaxxers".

Count on it.  When (not 'if') we have the ebloa outbreak here in the U.S. pharma will be prepared with 300M doses and the governments we will be be prepared with laws on the books.  [Edit:  'prepared' both to mandate vaccines and to 'control the narrative' within modern media.]  The medical/tech industry will be prepared with 'lists' of individual profiles to be used to figure you who gets what.

The 'problem' will be easily solvable if everyone does as they are told and shows up dutifully for their shots, but a certain fraction of people will not and they will be responsible for 'putting society at risk.'  And a lot of them may well  die of Ebola so 'problem solved' for that class of 'bitter clingers'.

I personally hope to be 'traveling' when the shit hits the fan.

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
'Dramatic' rise in African migrants arriving at US border
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48548031

No 'reset' with Ebola outbreak, WHO official says
www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2019/06/no-reset-ebola-outbreak-who-official-says

I wonder if Ebola has an outbreak in the US they will still be blaming "antivaxxers".
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Can you people please take the endless bickering back to the standard vaccination thread? I made this one separate so people could read factual events and not have to sift through endless arguments.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
...
And every kid deserves a disease free life (atleast the diseases which are preventable).
...

Half of kids are now on some prescription medication for brain problems, auto-immunity related problems (asthma, insulin dependent diabetes, arthritis), etc, etc.  Basically if one reads the fine print on the vaccine insert, there is a list of all of the things we see in the real world if we bother to look.

Do the kids 'deserve' that?

I personally believe the kiddies 'deserve' at least a total health outcome study to figure out what is going wrong and whether the ever increasing vaccine load that they are taking on might have anything to do with the widespread health problems that 'we' are facing.

For some reason there is a dedicated effort to NOT do a relatively simple total health outcome study which is 'open' (meaning the study protocols are negotiated in advance and adhered to over the course of the study.)  The most likely reason for the resistance seems to me most likely to be that vaccines would be found to be a contributing factor to decline in health (and increased spending on pharmaceuticals) and powerful people don't want to find this out.

If one watches carefully, lots of people advocating our current vaccine regimes will not say that vaccines are safe.  News anchors will say 'no problems possible.  Period.'  What other more officially placed people will What they will say is something along the lines of 'we have no evidence that vaccines cause harm.' or some variation of that statement.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
There has to be way more going on here. It's starting to look like the whole government is out to kill us... except, maybe, Texas, that is: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/261093-2019-05-12-texas-rep-rips-big-pharma-shill-parental-rights-mean-more.htm.


E. coli added as ingredient to Meningitis vaccine





But not all vaccine addictives are harmless.

For 8 years, from 1955 to 1963, more than 98 million Americans received the polio vaccine. But it wasn’t until 60 years later, in 2015, that the CDC admitted that the polio vaccine had been contaminated with an ingredient — the cancer-causing Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40).


Cool


EDIT: Btw, look further down in the article for much more info on the ingredients in vaccines than the simple list, above.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Now that the mob is sufficiently frothing, time to go after the actual experts, the doctors who will not fall in line...

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-09/san-francisco-doctor-investigated-over-measles-vax-exemptions
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Dr Toni Bark, MD Speaking to the Washington State Legislature. 3 minutes every parent must hear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viqb0Q6xIuU
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Here's another thing that vaccinations are designed to do. It seems to have taken studies in Kenya to bring this out into the open.


"Mass sterilization": Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine



According to LifeSiteNews, a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.

The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.

The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:

    “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.” (Source.)


Dr. Ngare brought up several points about the mass tetanus vaccination program in Kenya that caused the Catholic doctors to become suspicious:

   Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

    Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of childbearing years, and why is it being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

    “Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare.

    But it is the five vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.” (Source.)


UNICEF: A History of Taking Advantage of Disasters to Mass Vaccinate


Check out the video and the sources at the site.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/mainstream-media-now-calling-vaccines-arrest-antivaxxers/

Maybe arresting antivaxxers is not good enough? Maybe they should be rounding them up and executing them for defying the state and daring to have autonomy over their own bodies? How far is too far for you?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Here's the real reason why we have open borders... even though both parties are proclaiming that they are doing something about illegals.


BIOLOGICAL INVASION: Disease-infested illegals are being intentionally deposited in cities across America after being exposed to tuberculosis, measles and other infectious diseases



Most conservatives believe that the Left-wing Democrat Party opposes President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure our borders and enforce all immigration laws because they want to flood the country with ‘new voters.’

That’s true to an extent, but that’s far from the whole story.

The primary objective of the American Left — and, really, the global Left — is the destruction of the United States as founded, period. This is something you should never forget because the United States stands as the one beacon of true individual freedom and liberty the world over; if we fall, there is no similar country to take our place.

Thus, if you look at the issues that are important to Democrats and you examine their political objectives and view the policies they pursue through this lens, you can begin to understand why they do the things they do.

Take the migrant invasion currently occurring along our U.S.-Mexico border. To any rational American, the right thing to do would be to give the president and our governing institutions all the diplomatic, financial, and physical tools required to secure it. But instead, Democrats fight the president tooth and nail.

And what’s happening? Not only are the migrants overwhelming our ability to handle the onslaught, because of the way our laws are written — and because Democrats refuse to work with Republicans and the president to change them — federal immigration officials have been forced to release disease-ridden migrants into our cities, thus exposing Americans to diseases we eradicated long ago.


Cool
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I really think that it is right do to this as to ensure public safety. It is important for kids to be vaccinated so that they will not obtain diseases that can be contagious to anyone. I truly think that it is an act of securing public welfare and security.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 14
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places

you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines.

People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them.

they have to read, where i live you can read all side effects, i doubt its possible to lie in pharmaindustry.

It is one thing to read something, and it is another to understand what is being read.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places

you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines.

People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them.

they have to read, where i live you can read all side effects, i doubt its possible to lie in pharmaindustry.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Many people are happy that there are vaccines. Why? Because they know that they will be banned from public places. This gives them an excuse so they don't have to fight with their kids about it. I mean, "Hey kid. You want to get stabbed or banned? Btw, choose getting stabbed, and you get banned from home." After all, these days most public places are disgusting.

Cool
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 14
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places

you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines.

People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places

you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  Angry

That would be a better point if your stone-age relatives had been making nuclear reactors to their heart's content.

If my forefather's immune systems didn't work without vaccines I wouldn't be here.  All I want is the right to have my body work in a manner which has proven effective for the last couple hundred million years.  I don't trust Merck Pharmaceutical's scientists enough to outsource my immune system function to them.  But if you do, 'God Bless, Move forward.'  None of us so-called 'anti-vaxxers' are trying to make that decision for you.

Living in society means that you make some concessions in order to stay a part of a community. Rockland County has said that in order to stay a part of their community, you must be vaccinated, otherwise they don't want you there. That said, if you want to truly make it fair, since its a retroactive change, I'd argue that they should pay for those that want to move because of the change.

Soon we'll wish we had the ole Russian policy of shipping us off to Siberia, because they probably don't care what you do there.

By your logic the following 'dangerous' people should be shipped off for the protection of the citizens:

  • People who 'cannot be' vaccinated for some reason.  You know:  cancer, aids, from elite families who know better, etc.
  • Similac babies who are not getting protection from their mothers.
  • Anyone for whom the vaccine 'didn't take'.  Some people simply don't generate a significant immune response.
  • Anyone for whom the vaccine has worn off.
  • Anyone who's been injected with pertussis vaccine and thus can be persistent asymptomatic carries of the wild-type bacteria.

Basically the best citizens to have are those who've had most or all of the piss-ant childhood right-of-passage ailments and are thus immune for life and pass on their immunity to their child during the critical phase of the child's immune system development.

In our modern societies which exhibit good sanitation practices you would actually get a lot more bang for the buck by banishing people who get caught speeding.

---

Whether the pro-vaxxers know it or not, this isn't about 'protecting society'.  It's about complying with the dictates handed down by 'leadership', proving that they are a good little servant who will do as your told, unquestioningly believe the priest class ('doctors', 'scientists'), and generally be non-threatening worker bees.  The hope in their minds is that be being complaint, and in fact enthusiastic supporters, they will be given a seat at the table when the shit hits the fan.  Sadly for them nothing could be farther from the truth.  The contempt that 'the powers that be' have for these drones knows no bounds.

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Three Brooklyn parents summoned to court for not vaccinating their kids; could face jail

http://www.stationgossip.com/2019/04/three-brooklyn-parents-summoned-to.html
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
This might not get around the stupid laws that are taking away the rights to travel, but it is a start.


PARTY POOPERS Anti-vaxxer parents hold ‘measles parties’ to give their kids the deadly virus so they become immune and don’t need MMR jab



Parents are hosting "measles parties" so their kids can contract the deadly virus instead of getting the jab, it has been reported.

City health officials blasted parents after they were found encouraging their un-vaccinated kids to get the virus from each other in Brooklyn, New York.

Some 285 cases of measles have been confirmed in New York since October

Anti-vaxxer parents in New York have been found to host parties in hopes their un-vaccinated children get infected with measles (stock image)

The movement against the MMR vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps and rubella, is largely thought to stem from the work of Andrew Wakefield.

The now discredited UK doctor penned a damning research paper claiming a link between the MMR vaccine, autism and bowel disease.

The study was retracted in 2010 but the paper has had a lasting influence with the "anti-vaxxer" movement particularly taking off in America.

And the movement has sparked concern amid the current measles outbreak in New York – the largest the city has seen since 1991.

It is believed misguided parents are hosting "measles parties", encouraging their young, un-vaccinated children to spread measles with the idea that once a child has contracted it, they will be immune.

The "parties" are similar to "pox-parties" where kids were encouraged to contract chickenpox from each other.

These were popular before the introduction of the varicella vaccine in 1955.

It is now widely recognised by health officials that vaccinating a child is far safer than deliberately infecting them.

MEASLES OUTBREAK

The measles virus is highly contagious and in some cases can lead to death.

The city's health commissioner said she was "particularly concerned" about these parties and urged parents to get the MMR vaccine for their children.

She said: "I understand that parents may be afraid of getting their children vaccinated.

"I know that getting vaccinated is far safer than getting measles."

According to the NHS, the MMR vaccine is "a safe and effective combined vaccine that protects against 3 separate illnesses – measles, mumps and rubella (German measles) – in a single injection.

"The full course of MMR vaccination requires 2 doses.

"Measles, mumps and rubella are highly infectious conditions that can have serious, potentially fatal complications, including meningitis, swelling of the brain (encephalitis) and deafness."


The dangers in this are that if the kids received many other vaccinations in the past, their immune systems might be weakened enough that they will be greatly harmed by simple measles, or even killed. If this happens, government will have the duty to prosecute them, and they won't have any way to fight government off.

If they want to do it right, they have to learn common law and sue the pants off the individuals (doctors and government officials) who suggested that vaccines were save in the first place. After all, there aren't any safety studies that have any real value, and there aren't any long-term safety studies.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
“I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.”


WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself?
                                                                       You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF.

The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now.
No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard)

Meanwhile in the real world:
I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”.

Yes, all your ideas are valid, and all my ideas are invalid. Why? Because you have declared them so of course! Tell me sweet summer child, what am I being overly sensitive about? The fact that you rely on everything EXCEPT logical fact based arguments?

The world does need people like me, and I will tell you why. There is a reason that the saying "don't shoot the messenger" originated, because they ALWAYS shoot the the messenger when he carry's bad news. No one wants to be the one to have to stand up to speak unpopular truths because people like you, instead of having a discussion based on facts and logic resort to infantile marginalization tactics that not only prevent these difficult discussions from being had, but further create extremism by denying anyone with unpopular ideas an outlet for even being heard as this compulsive need for comfort increasingly isolates them.

People like me are important because I don't give a fuck if you like me, and as a result I will discuss ideas that upset you or anyone else as long as they have basis in logic and fact. You want to live in a world where uncomfortable discussions are never had like a small child who wants the clouds to be made of cotton candy and glaciers made of ice cream because it is what makes you feel comfortable. People have an inherent need to belong, as a result no one is willing to step up and be the messenger destined to take those shots resulting in a disgusting hive mind herd mentality where free thought no longer exists. Your opinion of me and my methods are irrelevant. What is relevant is you are not presenting a logical fact based argument either because you are incapable, or you can not control your emotional state long enough to present one.

Much like the vaccination debate itself, instead of a discussion where facts are presented and discussed it has become a focal point for ignorant and emotionally charged people to focus their discontent upon a small minority who wants nothing more than to just be left alone. You run away now, until next time when your emotion gets the best of you again and you blurt out some nonsense without backing it up, declare yourself the winner, and turn tail and run before you are exposed to the faults in your argument. Hopefully your perception of moral superiority comforts you from the bad ideas from the bad man.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 14
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK

Great debate as usual.



Techshare,
I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life.
Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long.

Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation.
The Rotary example wasn't antidotal.
You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry.
There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it.
You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on...
How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you.
Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly.

"the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny
Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high  <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more.

And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from.

You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.

The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs.

“I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.”


WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself?
                                                                       You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF.

The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now.
No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard)

Meanwhile in the real world:
I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”.



Free speech exists to talk about the fringe subjects in the first place. Many want to simply silence anything controversial. This is a very bad idea, and will lead to very big problems if you allow people to silence one another.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK

Great debate as usual.



Techshare,
I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life.
Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long.

Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation.
The Rotary example wasn't antidotal.
You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry.
There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it.
You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on...
How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you.
Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly.

"the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny
Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high  <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more.

And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from.

You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.

The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs.

“I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.”


WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself?
                                                                       You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF.

The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now.
No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard)

Meanwhile in the real world:
I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ The issue of controlled immigration is already addressed (USA).

Consider that about one third of USA land is uninhabited. Also, consider that big cities show us that small cities could easily contain more population. Actually, there is the capability of the USA to hold many times the numbers of people that it contains. All one need do is look at the population that Bangladesh and India support.

The issue of uncontrolled immigration doesn't have much to do with the idea of greater population. Some of what it really has to do with is:
1. The style of living of the current population;
2. Maintaining control of the existing population by not bloating it beyond controllable numbers (slavery maintenance);
3. Fear of what might happen if the population is allowed to increase rapidly. Regarding over-the-border aliens, all we need do is look at the history of the USA allowing Hispanic peoples up over the border in the past.

The courts are set in place to handle the injury done by anyone, including illegals. If we have many more people doing injury, the courts can easily be expanded to handle more cases. If immigrants do injury, they can be forced into slave labor in the prisons as punishment. When this happens, immigrants won't want to come in any longer, or they will become law abiding citizens - remember, the country has room to hold many more people.

Virtually all the talk about controlling immigration has to do with the fact that the people don't know how to properly use the court system. If they did, they would use the courts when necessary, both on immigrants who did harm, and also on government officials who did them harm.

Which government officials are doing them harm? The ones who are taking away their right to travel on public lands without having anything other than hearsay as their reasoning.

Which hearsay? The hearsay that unvaccinated people are a danger to the rest of the people, or even to vaccinated people. All of it is talk. There are no studies. In fact, the fact that the vaccinated people are scared of the unvaccinated, shows that vaccinations are causing derangement-by-vaccinations, so that the vaccinated have needless fear of the unvaccinated.

The ban shows that it is the vaccinations, themselves, that are causing the ban to exist in the first place. Vaccinations are hazardous to all people... some immediately (autism in kids), and some later when they become fearful of nothing (because their brains are caused to act inefficiently by the vaccines). Or does anyone have double-blind test results that contradict this?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK

Great debate as usual.


Techshare,
I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life.
Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long.

Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation.
The Rotary example wasn't antidotal.
You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry.
There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it.
You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on...
How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you.
Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly.

"the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny
Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high  <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more.

And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from.

You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.

The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK

Great debate as usual.


Techshare,
I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life.
Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long.

Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation.
The Rotary example wasn't antidotal.
You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry.
There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it.
You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on...
How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you.
Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly.

"the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny
Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high  <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more.

full member
Activity: 980
Merit: 114
Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.

It is interesting how people always seem to see themselves on the side of the ones being protected but never imagine themselves being the ones stripped of their rights. You don't get it. The dilution of the rights of any is dilution of the rights of us all. This is how law works.
To me there have been too many records of contiguous diseases in the world already and I support the government restrictions of unvaccinated kids from public places in other to prevent spread of contiguous diseases. It better for us to prevent it from happening then looking for solutions after the harm have been done and I don't see it as an abuse of right of any kid.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK

Great debate as usual.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
So because I want the laws of my nation to be enforced, I don't want the people here to be infected with diseases, and I don't want all of our social systems to collapse under the weight of uncontrolled illegal immigration, and have our rights stripped I am a xenophobe? This continual autistic screeching from the left about racism, xenophobia, and victim status is so frequently and arbitrarily exploited it has literally become meaningless and made it that much harder to identify ACTUAL racists. Good job.

You have no argument so instead you are forced to resort to character attacks to pretend you have a point and pretend you are in a position of moral superiority. What about the immigrants already here who don't want their opportunities taken by this tidal wave of people from the 3rd world? Fuck them too right? Again, much like SaltySpitoon you are relying on the strawman of anti-vaccination in order to argue against the premise of preserving human and constitutional rights in favor of removing informed consent for medical treatment. I am not against vaccination, I am against COMPULSORY vaccination.

I didn't bring up immigration but it seems to be an argument you want to have: even if it's only with yourself...have at it.
Didn't call you a racist and thought what I said was very direct and clear.
I'm not a leftist or on the right and for sure have --zero- claim to moral superiority.

Your own words are the only things on this forum capable of character attacks against you.

Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.


OK
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
So because I want the laws of my nation to be enforced, I don't want the people here to be infected with diseases, and I don't want all of our social systems to collapse under the weight of uncontrolled illegal immigration, and have our rights stripped I am a xenophobe? This continual autistic screeching from the left about racism, xenophobia, and victim status is so frequently and arbitrarily exploited it has literally become meaningless and made it that much harder to identify ACTUAL racists. Good job.

You have no argument so instead you are forced to resort to character attacks to pretend you have a point and pretend you are in a position of moral superiority. What about the immigrants already here who don't want their opportunities taken by this tidal wave of people from the 3rd world? Fuck them too right? Again, much like SaltySpitoon you are relying on the strawman of anti-vaccination in order to argue against the premise of preserving human and constitutional rights in favor of removing informed consent for medical treatment. I am not against vaccination, I am against COMPULSORY vaccination.

I didn't bring up immigration but it seems to be an argument you want to have: even if it's only with yourself...have at it.
Didn't call you a racist and thought what I said was very direct and clear.
I'm not a leftist or on the right and for sure have --zero- claim to moral superiority.

Your own words are the only things on this forum capable of character attacks against you.

Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of.

I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

I dont see why not. Its not about whether its a choice or not, its a matter of public risk. You have the right to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on others. The argument can be made that people that could become carriers for dangerous infectious diseases are a risk to others.

You don't have to be vaccinated, you can just move elsewhere. I can't build a reactor where I'm at, but I could move somewhere where I could potentially obtain a permit to do so.

Whats your take on lepers?

It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?

If you don't care for the floods of accusations and if you're not a xenophobe then stop acting like a xenophobe.



This whole Anti-Vax Vaxx issue has so many aspects to it:
How much freedom do we want to give up for safety?
How much should we interfere with a parents choice? Even when that choice puts someone else and even their own child at risk.
I am vaccinated for things in countries I may never see, my kid was vaxxed, my pets are always vaxxed- I personally believe in being vaccinated.
Why parents can't trust news outlets or even their doctors to make well informed decisions?  <---that is a problem all on its own right now

About 15 years ago Rotary almost hit a wall with the Polio vaccination. People didn't want to be vaccinated anymore or let their children be vaccinated.
A lot of it was mis-information combined with the fact that Polio was at that point almost eradicated so not only were people afraid of the vaccine, or rumors of what was really happening but many had also not experienced the effects of an outbreak so they either didn't believe it existed or understand how devastating the effects  Polio could be.

So because I want the laws of my nation to be enforced, I don't want the people here to be infected with diseases, and I don't want all of our social systems to collapse under the weight of uncontrolled illegal immigration, and have our rights stripped I am a xenophobe? This continual autistic screeching from the left about racism, xenophobia, and victim status is so frequently and arbitrarily exploited it has literally become meaningless and made it that much harder to identify ACTUAL racists. Good job.

You have no argument so instead you are forced to resort to character attacks to pretend you have a point and pretend you are in a position of moral superiority. What about the immigrants already here who don't want their opportunities taken by this tidal wave of people from the 3rd world? Fuck them too right? Again, much like SaltySpitoon you are relying on the strawman of anti-vaccination in order to argue against the premise of preserving human and constitutional rights in favor of removing informed consent for medical treatment. I am not against vaccination, I am against COMPULSORY vaccination.

I didn't bring up immigration but it seems to be an argument you want to have: even if it's only with yourself...have at it.
Didn't call you a racist and thought what I said was very direct and clear.
I'm not a leftist or on the right and for sure have --zero- claim to moral superiority.

Your own words are the only things on this forum capable of character attacks against you.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

I dont see why not. Its not about whether its a choice or not, its a matter of public risk. You have the right to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on others. The argument can be made that people that could become carriers for dangerous infectious diseases are a risk to others.

You don't have to be vaccinated, you can just move elsewhere. I can't build a reactor where I'm at, but I could move somewhere where I could potentially obtain a permit to do so.

Whats your take on lepers?

It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?

If you don't care for the floods of accusations and if you're not a xenophobe then stop acting like a xenophobe.



This whole Anti-Vax Vaxx issue has so many aspects to it:
How much freedom do we want to give up for safety?
How much should we interfere with a parents choice? Even when that choice puts someone else and even their own child at risk.
I am vaccinated for things in countries I may never see, my kid was vaxxed, my pets are always vaxxed- I personally believe in being vaccinated.
Why parents can't trust news outlets or even their doctors to make well informed decisions?  <---that is a problem all on its own right now

About 15 years ago Rotary almost hit a wall with the Polio vaccination. People didn't want to be vaccinated anymore or let their children be vaccinated.
A lot of it was mis-information combined with the fact that Polio was at that point almost eradicated so not only were people afraid of the vaccine, or rumors of what was really happening but many had also not experienced the effects of an outbreak so they either didn't believe it existed or understand how devastating the effects  Polio could be.

So because I want the laws of my nation to be enforced, I don't want the people here to be infected with diseases, and I don't want all of our social systems to collapse under the weight of uncontrolled illegal immigration, and have our rights stripped I am a xenophobe? This continual autistic screeching from the left about racism, xenophobia, and victim status is so frequently and arbitrarily exploited it has literally become meaningless and made it that much harder to identify ACTUAL racists. Good job.

You have no argument so instead you are forced to resort to character attacks to pretend you have a point and pretend you are in a position of moral superiority. What about the immigrants already here who don't want their opportunities taken by this tidal wave of people from the 3rd world? Fuck them too right? Again, much like SaltySpitoon you are relying on the strawman of anti-vaccination in order to argue against the premise of preserving human and constitutional rights in favor of removing informed consent for medical treatment. I am not against vaccination, I am against COMPULSORY vaccination.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
The right to travel is a right that everyone has, especially a parent with his property... his child.

File claims in a courts of record - particularly Federal District Court, Corpus Juris Secundum, volume 25, section 334 - against the men/women who are not allowing your right of travel with your property. File against them as wrongdoers. Select at least half of the jury as those who understand vaccines as you do. Let the accused provide the safety docs for the vaccines, as well as the tests that prove the vaccines are beneficial... with proof that the vaccines that have seemed to work in the past, didn't simply work through timing. And that the disease were in remission, already.

As long as you keep filing complaints, and keep on using attorneys, you will fail... except if the court doesn't want you to fail this time, for some nefarious reason.

Karl Lentz... listen to the first 20 episodes - http://jurorinlaw.com/talkshoe/klentz/.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

I dont see why not. Its not about whether its a choice or not, its a matter of public risk. You have the right to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on others. The argument can be made that people that could become carriers for dangerous infectious diseases are a risk to others.

You don't have to be vaccinated, you can just move elsewhere. I can't build a reactor where I'm at, but I could move somewhere where I could potentially obtain a permit to do so.

Whats your take on lepers?

It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?

If you don't care for the floods of accusations and if you're not a xenophobe then stop acting like a xenophobe.



This whole Anti-Vax Vaxx issue has so many aspects to it:
How much freedom do we want to give up for safety?
How much should we interfere with a parents choice? Even when that choice puts someone else and even their own child at risk.
I am vaccinated for things in countries I may never see, my kid was vaxxed, my pets are always vaxxed- I personally believe in being vaccinated.
Why parents can't trust news outlets or even their doctors to make well informed decisions?  <---that is a problem all on its own right now

About 15 years ago Rotary almost hit a wall with the Polio vaccination. People didn't want to be vaccinated anymore or let their children be vaccinated.
A lot of it was mis-information combined with the fact that Polio was at that point almost eradicated so not only were people afraid of the vaccine, or rumors of what was really happening but many had also not experienced the effects of an outbreak so they either didn't believe it existed or understand how devastating the effects  Polio could be.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
snip
Sounds pretty reasonable to me as public policy.

I would mention that the medical issues with unfiltered, unfettered illegal immigrants goes far beyond this. Docs here are having to deal now with vast numbers of tropical diseases they have zero experience with, various types of parasites.

It's also true that we're setting up two parallel systems, one which is lax (and free) for the immigrants and another which is strict (and expensive) for the citizens.

Blame it on virtue-signalling policy makers far removed from reality being generous with other people's money.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584

I'd be blunt but I really don't care if adults want to maim themselves with preventable diseases. Want measles? Go ahead, enjoy the rashes and the 1 year weakened immune system. Polio? Whatever floats your boat.

The problem is they're endangering people who can't take the vaccines, like very small childen and the elderly, who also happen to be more susceptible to complications. These people are relying on herd immunity.
sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal

Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places

You have it right, I definitely see something going on here. This is a preliminary test of the government to see where in the equation the population sits at currently. I also expect this will not be the last of this tightening of the noose around the necks of unsuspecting citizens (until it is too late). From the cited zerohedge article: " What Rockland County is doing is unconscionable, and they should be completely and utterly ashamed of themselves." [highlights mine]. We must stay vigilant and informative - it is a crucial time in history. Thank you brother for bringing this up.

legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Great argument. The only problem is I provided lots of sources and plenty of logical arguments, none of which you bothered to even attempt to refute, instead opting to just call it "bullshit" and creating a false equivalency. I didn't say you were scared, I suggested that the same dismissive logic you applied to me is also equally able to be applied to you, that of fear mongering. I also never told you to "shut up and deal with you doing whatever". Also stripping you? What?

It is a FACT that "antivaxxers" are in the minority, in the literal sense they are small in numbers. I am very sorry of you can't manage to rub a couple brain cells together to come up with a coherent argument against the argument I presented instead once again opting for arrogant dismissal. What about illegal immigrants? Clearly they don't give a shit about our community if they are bringing disease in to the country and violating our laws. Why is it you are so fast to ignore them but focus on "antivaxxers" even though the numbers show they are a much larger source of disease outbreaks?

See you just want your poorly thought out arguments to only work for you while you totally dismiss solid logical arguments with sources I present as bullshit instead of even attempting to directly refute them. You seem hyper focused on the vaccine denial aspect of this when I in fact never once attempted to argue against vaccination, only compulsory vaccination. You aren't even addressing my premise, you are just creating a premise, attributing it to me, then expecting me to defend it as you repeatedly dismiss my actual premise. If you are as smart as you think you are why is it you can't engage me in an intellectually honest debate?

No, the problem is we are having a clash of ideologies, not a debate. Your own words are religion to you, and mine are the same to me. I'm not interested in your points about immigration, I brought that up a while ago so you wouldn't waste your time. I'd have to swim through countless hours of research to justify whether your sources are valid or not, what they actually mean, and whether it is worth communicating my thoughts on them. I'd be happy to do that if this was a thread about border security and influx of disease, but as I stated before, I know nothing about any of that. If that was the topic of the thread, I wouldn't have replied, as I have nothing to add to that conversation. I'm not dismissing your claim that immigrant carriers of diseases are of greater number than domestic unvaccinated citizens, because I don't know otherwise. You are not a minority group because of an individual belief on whether or not you should be vaccinated. Citing the 6th grade statistics definition of minority versus the anthropology definition of minority is dishonest.

I cannot engage you in a debate because I cannot understand your point of view. I really don't mean this as a personal attack, but to me, it sounds like you live in a self entitled fairy land, where you can do absolutely anything you want with no regard for others. I understand this is probably not the case, but from my perspective thats what your words mean. My absolute main point throughout the entire discussion which you keep trying to drag away from "County in New York bans unvaccinated from public spaces" to, "We aren't as bad as this other group!" is that you cannot force people to accept your life choices. You make a choice, other people have a reaction, you don't get to scream outrage because other people aren't as understanding of what you consider a good idea. If your point is that the threat is being overblown, sure you might be right! That doesn't change anything, your rights are not being taken from you until someone is holding you down and injecting you. People are just saying I don't want to live with you.

Everything you describe as false equivalencies and incoherent arguments makes absolute perfect sense to me, I'd assume in the same way your argument makes perfect sense to you, and absolutely no sense to me. You don't debate people who have different ideologies as you, because they aren't formed from misunderstanding but perception.
I'm not trying to take some philosophical high ground, I'm just stating that we are both wasting our time.

I do not think that people are physically able to take responsibility for the actions of their choice to not be vaccinated. That is why it is a problem at the social level rather than just a matter of individual responsibility. I have zero problem with unvaccinated people living the way they want, but just don't be surprised if your only neighbors are also unvaccinated neighbors, and when the question is asking 1,000 people to move elsewhere or asking 1, its not really a hard to answer. Set your own house on fire if you'd like, but the situation is different if you live in an apartment complex.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
....
Here is what I'm claiming:

1) Lack of vaccinations lead to diseases that otherwise wouldn't exist.

2) Those responsible for infecting others with diseases that otherwise wouldn't exist are solely responsible for the cases that they transmit.

3) In the case that a disease is transmitted, and a non statically insignificant case where permanent damage is done, the one who transmitted it is responsible.

4) The financial and life toll associated with lack of vaccination outweighs your right to infect others.


Here is my conclusion, being told to go away because the rest of the population doesn't want your diseases is not unreasonable. Strapping you into a chair and forcing vaccinations on you is unreasonable. The needs of a society outweigh the rights of an individual, and if you disagree you should not have those rights forcibly stripped from you, but given the option to politely go elsewhere.

If your point is that other unvaccinated individuals are coming in illegally anyway, why does that suddenly invalidate all other concerns? Shouldn't we be just as concerned about them as unvaccinated U.S citizens? ....
Sounds pretty reasonable to me as public policy.

I would mention that the medical issues with unfiltered, unfettered illegal immigrants goes far beyond this. Docs here are having to deal now with vast numbers of tropical diseases they have zero experience with, various types of parasites.

It's also true that we're setting up two parallel systems, one which is lax (and free) for the immigrants and another which is strict (and expensive) for the citizens.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
You are just repeating yourself now. I could make exactly the same accusation on your part that you are using fear of infection to sell your own preferred narrative using the exact same dismissive logic you use. The sourced numbers are pretty milk toast and well accepted, its not like I linked some conspiracy rag, but anything you can use to not actually address the issue right? Don't make stuff up, put on your big boy pants and fucking learn something instead of just arrogantly dismissing the premise.

The concept that immigration can lead to bringing in infectious disease is not some conspiracy theory, this is a well established FACT. What is also a fact is the population of the so called "antivaxxers" are tiny compared to the flood of illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is doing far more to spread disease than a handful of people refusing to vaccinate. Unfortunately it is politically incorrect to address this reality, so all the spineless people ignore it in favor of jumping on the much more popular "2 minutes of hate" against "antivaxxers" fueled and coordinated by popular media via the fear porn that they love so much. This doesn't invalidate other concerns, however if the primary cause is being obfuscated in order to create more dehumanization of minority groups and sell people on the removal of their rights using that fear, then even if all the "antivaxers" just disappear over night you still have a huge problem. In summary you are trying to plug a pinhole in the boat you are in while the whole back end just fell off of the boat. You should probably put the boat back together before worrying about your pinhole.

If I say that I also support unvaccinated illegal immigrants staying out of the same spaces as unvaccinated U.S citizens, does that help? I'm not "afraid" of infection, statistically it'll never happen to me, but its an absolutely real possibility. I'm not pretending that every single unvaccinated child will catch the plague, but all it takes is one to screw over a lot of people. The same could happen with immigrants as a source of contagion, but that doesn't mean we ignore the pinhole until we've shored up everything else. The problem is that with a single case that occurs, who foots the bill? Who is held responsible, and makes everything right?

Its not media, its thousands of years of human history that have taught us diseases are bad. Telling me to shut up and deal with you doing whatever you want is dismissive in itself, what about my right to not catch your diseases? Now you are stripping me, and using your minority defense to make your point infallible. Anti vaxers are not a minority group, they are just reckless. The point I keep trying to stress, you don't have to get vaccinated. Just don't expect everyone to respect your decision. I don't have to bathe, and if I don't bathe for a few years, I don't get the right to get pissed off when they kick me off the subway. If you don't give a shit about your community, you aren't welcome in your community.

My only point is that you only get to live exactly how you want, with whatever you perceive as your rights, if you live on your own. Don't expect that you can force your bullshit on others, any more than I can force mine on you. That doesn't mean we have to live harmoniously as neighbors however, and a community can tell me to leave for not bathing, and they can tell you to leave for being unvaccinated. A homeowners association can tell you to leave for not having the right color doors, your recourse is to not live in that homeowners association if you don't want to abide by their rules.

We obviously don't care much about each other's opinions even after making our claims. Thats cool, we nor our opinions will likely never effect each other in any way. I'm alright with watching it play out. Shoot me a pm with I told you so when it all works out in the end.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
I am not ignoring anything. Again, as in every other time I bring this issue up you avoid responding to the directly related impact of uncontrolled illegal immigration. When dealing with mass medical issues, they use a process called "triage" which is designed to prioritize medical treatment based on the severity of the condition of the patients. Now if there is a group X which needs to be addressed but is in the minority, and a group Y who is in the majority and more severe, it makes no sense to treat group X before addressing the circumstances directly causing the issues of group Y.

I argue that this tiny minority of people only demanding bodily autonomy are simply being used as the scapegoats to cover up for the disease that uncontrolled immigration from the 3rd world with substandard sanitation and healthcare as well as higher infection rates of transmissible diseases. Of course the synthesis of this scapegoating is advancing the continual incremental conditioning of people to losing their rights to everything, including their own bodies.

I don't know enough about the actual non fearmongering statistics regarding illegal immigration, and am not in a position to respond. I'd be happy to point out the CDC's statics that seem to conclude that Mexico has a higher vaccination rate than the U.S, but most of that data is for children, and I have not validated the legitimacy of their data.

I would agree with you if the tiny majority demanding bodily autonomy were absolutely isolated, and had no risk of spreading diseases that they obtained by choice to those that did not make the same choice. I support the choice not to be vaccinated, I do not support the choice to put others at risk because of it though.

Consider the choice to stop bathing. No one can force a person to bathe, but you may find out that you are no longer welcome in public places. Why is that understandable, but when a health risk is at stake, its oppressing a minority group? Again, its all fine and good as long as your choices only effect you when they effect others, it is not acceptable.

That's cute. How convenient you simply can just skip over this entire topic and not even discuss it because "I don't know enough". I love the additional hypocritical touch as you cast my point as fear mongering, but yours as completely logical when we are talking about the same result of the spread of infectious disease. I guess your fear mongering has more credibility does it?

As far as Mexico's vaccination rates, first of all you know very well Mexico is not the only source nation for illegal immigrants, nor are they even the majority source any more. People from all over the world cross illegally via our Southern border, also increasingly from Asian nations where infection rates are also very high. Furthermore it is well established that the rates of infectious disease are in fact substantially higher in South America than North America. I know you are smart enough to know these things, so I can only assume you are being disingenuous at this point. I also find it interesting that the areas that are having the most outbreaks are also in or geographically close to "sanctuary" cities which would naturally act as an inductive force for illegal immigrants to congregate. Here are some related references:

https://www.cdc.gov/measles/images/trends-measles-cases.png

Hmm... 2014... I wonder what happened in 2014...

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/320/cpsprodpb/174D0/production/_105204459_border-nc.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_American_immigration_crisis
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/05/29/measles-outbreaks-cdc/9718129/

Interesting... the rate of measles infections spiked along with the flood of immigration. Curious we just had a large surge of illegal immigration and suddenly the rate of measles infections is again increasing isn't it?


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-outbreaks/more-than-2000-migrants-quarantined-in-u-s-detention-centers-due-to-disease-outbreaks-idUSKBN1QR0EW
and what is this? Thousands in quarantine? Those seem like some pretty high rates of infection. I wonder how many that they didn't catch got through...

Of course this is all just fear mongering and we should just get over it an give up what few rights we have left for our "safety" right? Pay no attention to the thousands of disease carrying illegal immigrants behind the curtain.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1232
Do you know why people are against vaccination and scare of it? Because of ignorance. I have read an article about this before.

People were influenced not to get vaccinated or doesn't let their kids to be vaccinated because of ignorance.
Humans are scared of the things they can't understand. For example, "chlorine". Chlorine is a very fatal type of chemical and everyone knows it. But 96% of human doesn't even know that the salts that they use for their food every day is containing "chlorine". Chlorine is one of the vital chemicals in vaccines and this is a fact.

People are scared of a vaccine because they are not familiar with the chemicals within the vaccines. Scientific names are really scary.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
I am not ignoring anything. Again, as in every other time I bring this issue up you avoid responding to the directly related impact of uncontrolled illegal immigration. When dealing with mass medical issues, they use a process called "triage" which is designed to prioritize medical treatment based on the severity of the condition of the patients. Now if there is a group X which needs to be addressed but is in the minority, and a group Y who is in the majority and more severe, it makes no sense to treat group X before addressing the circumstances directly causing the issues of group Y.

I argue that this tiny minority of people only demanding bodily autonomy are simply being used as the scapegoats to cover up for the disease that uncontrolled immigration from the 3rd world with substandard sanitation and healthcare as well as higher infection rates of transmissible diseases. Of course the synthesis of this scapegoating is advancing the continual incremental conditioning of people to losing their rights to everything, including their own bodies.

I don't know enough about the actual non fearmongering statistics regarding illegal immigration, and am not in a position to respond. I'd be happy to point out the CDC's statics that seem to conclude that Mexico has a higher vaccination rate than the U.S, but most of that data is for children, and I have not validated the legitimacy of their data.

I would agree with you if the tiny majority demanding bodily autonomy were absolutely isolated, and had no risk of spreading diseases that they obtained by choice to those that did not make the same choice. I support the choice not to be vaccinated, I do not support the choice to put others at risk because of it though.

Consider the choice to stop bathing. No one can force a person to bathe, but you may find out that you are no longer welcome in public places. Why is that understandable, but when a health risk is at stake, its oppressing a minority group? Again, its all fine and good as long as your choices only effect you when they effect others, it is not acceptable.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Yeah, why would you compare threats when you can just let the lesser threat serve as a scapegoat for the more severe threat right? All it will cost is your freedom for some temporary safety. The threat of losing human rights is far more real and significant. I don't know if you have noticed, but this stripping of rights has become a global trend, but as long as they have scary excuses its A-OK right?

THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS

No one has a right to compromise public safety. Saying that threat X statistically will claim 1,000 lives vs threat Y will statistically claim 100 doesn't mean we can just ignore threat Y. We could save far more lives ignoring nearly all hot-button issues combined, and focusing on proper nutrition, but that doesn't mean there is no point in anything besides nutrition.

This topic isn't about people in Rockland County being forcibly strapped to chairs and injected full of chemicals, its about them being told, you aren't welcome here because you are a threat to public safety. Those that have enjoyed their decades of lack of crippling diseases should change, just because others are willing to take the risk? You don't have to be forced to put anything inside your body if you don't want to, just don't feel indignation when others tell you they don't want to come in contact with you.

Owning a snotty tissue with measles virus on it will get you sent to prison for a while, why is having the child that produces those snotty tissues acceptable?


This isn't vaccination related, its travel related, but check out the SARS outbreak in Toronto in the early 2000s. It didn't affect hundreds of people, but it shut the city down pretty well. The doctors that didn't quit were quarantined along with those they came in contact with. They don't really want little Jimmy going to the hospital if he comes down with something that could kill the other patients with weakened immune systems, and quarantine is awful expensive. 

I am not ignoring anything. Again, as in every other time I bring this issue up you avoid responding to the directly related impact of uncontrolled illegal immigration. When dealing with mass medical issues, they use a process called "triage" which is designed to prioritize medical treatment based on the severity of the condition of the patients. Now if there is a group X which needs to be addressed but is in the minority, and a group Y who is in the majority and more severe, it makes no sense to treat group X before addressing the circumstances directly causing the issues of group Y.

I argue that this tiny minority of people only demanding bodily autonomy are simply being used as the scapegoats to cover up for the disease that uncontrolled immigration from the 3rd world with substandard sanitation and healthcare as well as higher infection rates of transmissible diseases. Of course the synthesis of this scapegoating is advancing the continual incremental conditioning of people to losing their rights to everything, including their own bodies.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Yeah, why would you compare threats when you can just let the lesser threat serve as a scapegoat for the more severe threat right? All it will cost is your freedom for some temporary safety. The threat of losing human rights is far more real and significant. I don't know if you have noticed, but this stripping of rights has become a global trend, but as long as they have scary excuses its A-OK right?

THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS

No one has a right to compromise public safety. Saying that threat X statistically will claim 1,000 lives vs threat Y will statistically claim 100 doesn't mean we can just ignore threat Y. We could save far more lives ignoring nearly all hot-button issues combined, and focusing on proper nutrition, but that doesn't mean there is no point in anything besides nutrition.

This topic isn't about people in Rockland County being forcibly strapped to chairs and injected full of chemicals, its about them being told, you aren't welcome here because you are a threat to public safety. Those that have enjoyed their decades of lack of crippling diseases should change, just because others are willing to take the risk? You don't have to be forced to put anything inside your body if you don't want to, just don't feel indignation when others tell you they don't want to come in contact with you.

Owning a snotty tissue with measles virus on it will get you sent to prison for a while, why is having the child that produces those snotty tissues acceptable?


This isn't vaccination related, its travel related, but check out the SARS outbreak in Toronto in the early 2000s. It didn't affect hundreds of people, but it shut the city down pretty well. The doctors that didn't quit were quarantined along with those they came in contact with. They don't really want little Jimmy going to the hospital if he comes down with something that could kill the other patients with weakened immune systems, and quarantine is awful expensive. 
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?

I would absolutely say that Antivaxers have the right to do as they wish, if they are willing to agree to deal with any consequences as a result of their choice. Thats not going to happen though. I'm not going to try to compare threats, just because one threat has a higher total amount of damage as a possibility, doesn't mean we should disregard the others. Talking about dangerous precedents, do you know the human rights you lose during a federal isolation order by the CDC? You are imposing that on others by choosing not to get vaccinated. Yes, I understand that not everyone that doesn't get vaccinated will contract all of the diseases, but the possibility is real and not insignificant.

Your rights end when they spill over and infringe on others, thats just sort of how human civilization works. You don't get to claim minority rights, when they are harming the majority or anyone else.

Yeah, why would you compare threats when you can just let the lesser threat serve as a scapegoat for the more severe threat right? All it will cost is your freedom for some temporary safety. The threat of losing human rights is far more real and significant. I don't know if you have noticed, but this stripping of rights has become a global trend, but as long as they have scary excuses its A-OK right?

THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?

I would absolutely say that Antivaxers have the right to do as they wish, if they are willing to agree to deal with any consequences as a result of their choice. Thats not going to happen though. I'm not going to try to compare threats, just because one threat has a higher total amount of damage as a possibility, doesn't mean we should disregard the others. Talking about dangerous precedents, do you know the human rights you lose during a federal isolation order by the CDC? You are imposing that on others by choosing not to get vaccinated. Yes, I understand that not everyone that doesn't get vaccinated will contract all of the diseases, but the possibility is real and not insignificant.

Your rights end when they spill over and infringe on others, thats just sort of how human civilization works. You don't get to claim minority rights, when they are harming the majority or anyone else.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

I dont see why not. Its not about whether its a choice or not, its a matter of public risk. You have the right to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on others. The argument can be made that people that could become carriers for dangerous infectious diseases are a risk to others.

You don't have to be vaccinated, you can just move elsewhere. I can't build a reactor where I'm at, but I could move somewhere where I could potentially obtain a permit to do so.

Whats your take on lepers?

It is literally about that choice for some people. Kind of you to summarily dismiss the reality of the minority. After all, it is not like we live in a constitutional republic where the rights of the minority are protected by the constitution right? Do you really think this tiny minority of people who refuse to vaccinate for whatever reason are more of a threat than the thousands flooding in from our Southern border every month?

I find it interesting a lot of the same people cheering for the loss of individual rights in the name of temporary safety are also cheering for open borders. Of course when you point this out, instantly come the floods of accusations of racism and xenophobia, because of course infectious diseases care what race you are right? At what point does this obsession with taking the rights of others to provide temporary safety end? Is this not setting a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse in the very near future?
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
The whole vax thing is a touch subject and I think people should have the choice, but what's the issue with people not being vaccinated? Surely these diseases would only effect people who haven't been vaccinated anyway? If you've been vaccinated then what's to worry about? The only people then endanger our themselves and others who haven't been immunized, but that would be their fault if that ever happened.

Vaccines work by introducing a dead virus that allow your body to create antibodies. In the case that you come in contact with the live virus in the future, your body already has the antibodies necessary to fight it off before it gets the chance to proliferate. That doesn't mean you can't get sick with a disease if you have a vaccine for it, it typically just means that you'll be able to fight it off more easily before it gets the chance to develop. If you have ever gotten the flu after getting a flu shot, you'll probably notice its like a cold, not that bad, but it still sucks. That doesn't mean you aren't contagious though.

I agree that people should have the choice to be vaccinated or not, but that also means they should understand that others may dislike their choice and not choose to just respect it. Nudists live in their own separate communities because they'd get arrested for walking around naked in public elsewhere. If you enjoy chewing gum, maybe avoid Singapore. If you are an avid gun collector, and enjoy shooting, maybe avoid living in Boston.

Its not really that touchy of a subject on the surface, it becomes an upsetting subject when we get to the step past it. Suppose everyone has the right to choose whether they get vaccinated, the next step is what to do with those that do get sick, and thats a humanitarian can of worms.
hero member
Activity: 976
Merit: 575
Cryptophile at large
The whole vax thing is a touchy subject and I think people should have the choice, but what's the issue with people not being vaccinated? Surely these diseases would only effect people who haven't been vaccinated anyway? If you've been vaccinated then what's to worry about? The only people then endanger our themselves and others who haven't been immunized, but that would be their fault if that ever happened.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I don’t think this is so much about freedom but is more about public safety.

It needs to be noted that vaccines are absolutely safe and the antivaxxers rely on disinformation and propaganda. There have been many studies over a long time that confirm this safety.

Some children however are not healthy enough to receive certain vaccines and as such cannot receive them. If children who can receive the vaccines don’t, then those who cannot are being put at risk.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Whats your take on lepers?

In my country we shipped off lepers to a far-away island so they don't endanger the population. After we managed to eradicate the diseases the island was decommissioned (the facilities are maintained as some sort of museum).

To be fair it was easier back then to just load people into ships without complaints - heard there used to be a separate island for prostitutes.

Right, that was sort of my point, no one has any objection to telling a specific group with infectious diseases, sorry you are a danger to public health, and are being relocated against your will. In this case, they aren't saying, alright we are shipping you off to an island, but, sorry you are a danger to public health, and can't stay here.

Compare the situation where someone is infected with a dangerous disease, versus someone who is healthy and carrying a vial containing the disease. One is a bio hazard that will get a SWAT/CDC team surrounding you, and the other is acceptable? People would be outraged if government officials ran into a house, killed, and cremated a disease carrier to prevent spread, but thats what was done in the past... We got around that with vaccinations and advances in medical science, but if people make a choice to disregard the measures in place to prevent a disease that requires those kinds of measures, you can't get angry when they decide that rather than having to deal with preventing disease, they'll just politely ask you to leave.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
Whats your take on lepers?

In my country we shipped off lepers to a far-away island so they don't endanger the population. After we managed to eradicate the diseases the island was decommissioned (the facilities are maintained as some sort of museum).

To be fair it was easier back then to just load people into ships without complaints - heard there used to be a separate island for prostitutes.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

I dont see why not. Its not about whether its a choice or not, its a matter of public risk. You have the right to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't infringe on others. The argument can be made that people that could become carriers for dangerous infectious diseases are a risk to others.

You don't have to be vaccinated, you can just move elsewhere. I can't build a reactor where I'm at, but I could move somewhere where I could potentially obtain a permit to do so.

Whats your take on lepers?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  Angry

Living in society means that you make some concessions in order to stay a part of a community.

Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ Everything depends on the jury. But someone has to bring the case before the jury in the right way. If done right, since the medical doesn't have any safety studies, not only can the vaccine patrol be stopped, but the perpetrators can be fined.

Cool
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 148
I'have always admired the US healthcare system. Everyone knows that it is full of shit but no one can do anything with it. The lobbyism of pharma companies is something unbelievable.
My friend tried to buy some contact lenses in US and faced that he need to get an assignment (or however it called) from doctor for it. And he had to pay the doctor 5 times more than lense cost just to get 1 paper. And that happened because some retard didn't use his lense properly and lost his sight. This happens in like 0.00001% cases but the issue was heavily lobbied and people now should pay for that bullshit.

It is pretty much the same thing with vaccination. Pure lobbyism.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  Angry

Living in society means that you make some concessions in order to stay a part of a community. Rockland County has said that in order to stay a part of their community, you must be vaccinated, otherwise they don't want you there. That said, if you want to truly make it fair, since its a retroactive change, I'd argue that they should pay for those that want to move because of the change.

Soon we'll wish we had the ole Russian policy of shipping us off to Siberia, because they probably don't care what you do there.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ But the local jury has the power to strike down any law locally. Of course, they can't do it if they don't know that they have the right, or if they aren't called so that they can be asked the question, or if they aren't asked the right question in the right way, etc.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.

It is interesting how people always seem to see themselves on the side of the ones being protected but never imagine themselves being the ones stripped of their rights. You don't get it. The dilution of the rights of any is dilution of the rights of us all. This is how law works.
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-27/ny-county-bans-unvaccinated-kids-all-public-places
Jump to: