Yes- it includes a new NZ requirement to give your password and ability to give heavy fines for failing to comply:
The reality is that they could already search your laptop and ask for your password.
- having your visa cancelled and being denied entry. This would result in detention and a removal order. A removal order comes with a 2 year ban and would exclude you from numerous other countries.
The fine just give them an additional tool to threaten with. They can potentially detain you until the fine is paid and then execute the removal order.
New Zealand is a pussycat in comparison to the USA.
You are more likely to get searched for "illegal Apples" than for drugs or have your laptop searched. (NZ doesn't have as much of a problem with imported drugs as the US)
The ministry of primary industries (MPI) will ask you and if necessary search you for fruit and meat products that could bring in foreign diseases. (Yes really - I'm telling the truth) They have fruit sniffing dogs.
. If you are friendly and polite to them they will be polite and treat you like a customer rather than a suspect.
They do usually have a armed police officer nearby (or in case of ships) - someone from the Defence Force.
They only have access to guns in locked in a strongbox their car.
Their use of guns is extremely strict.
Some specially trained officers carry a Tazer.
The only exceptions to this is that the police at the airport have guns and at Parliament and when protecting foreign officials.
When a New Zealand police officer sees a criminal with a gun they back off and call in a specialized unit called the "armed offenders squad" (AOS = SWAT team) or Anti-Terrorism Unit (In case of Terrorist threat) - I'm not kidding.
Most police officers there will smile, talk to you politely and be helpful.
The rare sight of armed police marching through Richmond streets was a “necessary response to a potentially dangerous situation” that developed after two men took off following the incident,
If you break down on the side of the road as a tourist. The police will probably stop and assist. They are ridiculously friendly there.
LOL -if you are from the USA have a look at how they arrest people in New Zealand.
The ruling that the 1st and 4th amendment don't apply to border searches.
United States v. Arnold, 533 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2008), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not require government agents to have reasonable suspicion before searching laptops or other digital devices at the border, including international airports
United States v. Cotterman,[4] (9th Cir. en banc 2013), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that property, such as a laptop and other electronic storage devices, presented for inspection when entering the United States at the border may not be subject to forensic examination without a reason for suspicion, a holding that weakened the border search exception of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
July 31, 2017
FAQs on Border Inspection
NOTE: The following general information is not a substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney if
you have specific legal questions about your particular situation.
1. Do I have the same legal rights at the border that I would elsewhere in the United States?
No, because of the so-called “border search exception.” The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution
generally forbids “unreasonable searches and seizures” by the government. However, the Supreme Court has
held that at the border (which includes international ports of entry like airports), the government has broad
authority “pursuant to the longstanding right of the sovereign to protect itself by stopping and examining
persons and property crossing into this country.” That heightened governmental interest in security,
combined with a lower expectation of privacy at the border than in the interior, has led the Supreme Court to
conclude that “routine” border searches are “not subject to any requirement of reasonable suspicion,
probable cause, or warrant.” However, a class of “non-routine” border searches require at least some level of
particularized suspicion, if they are particularly intrusive, destructive, or offensive.
Although the Supreme Court has not addressed specifically the search of electronic devices at the border,
other federal courts generally agree that such searches do not require even reasonable suspicion—consistent
with the general rule. One exception is the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (covering Alaska, Arizona,
California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington), which held in 2013 that reasonable
suspicion must underlie the “forensic examination” of a computer hard drive taken at the border.
Given this legal landscape, US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) claims broad authority to search and
seize electronic devices at the border, and has issued Directive No. 3340-049 on the Border Search of
Electronic Devices Containing Information (hereafter referred to as the “Directive”).
2. Didn’t the Supreme Court rule that the police must get a warrant before searching someone’s cell
phone?
Yes, but that case did not involve a border search. In Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014), the Supreme
Court held that a warrant is generally required before a search of a cell phone seized incident to arrest. While
there is an argument that similar reasoning could be applied to border searches, so far, lower courts have
typically declined to extend Riley to limit border searches of electronic devices.
3. So could my laptop, phone, or other electronic device be searched if I am a US citizen returning from
traveling abroad?
Yes, even if you are a US citizen or a lawful permanent resident (LPR, or “green card” holder). According to the
CBP (https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/inspection- electronic-devices-tearsheet.pdf), a
2
traveler may be chosen for inspection for many different reasons (for example, randomly, or because his or
her name matches a “person of interest” in the government’s databases, or because his or her travel
documents are incomplete). As DHS itself has emphasized, the Equal Protection Clause forbids intentional
discrimination by the federal government on account of race, religion, or ethnicity, and thus these should not
serve as a reason or factor for conducting discretionary border searches.
4. What about the data on my phone, computer, or other electronic device?
The Directive allows CBP officers and border agents to search travelers’ electronic devices, including “any
device that may contain information, such as computers . . . mobile phones . . . and any other electronic or
digital devices,” CBP agents may swipe through your phone or look through the documents on your computer.
The government also claims the authority to copy the data on your electronic devices. After the information
on the devices has been reviewed, if no probable cause exists to seize that information, any copies of the
information must be destroyed and the devices must be returned, ordinarily within seven days of the
determination of no probable cause
Under the Directive, CBP officers may share copies of information contained in electronic devices “with
federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement agencies to the extent consistent with applicable law and
policy.” And the Directive provides that CBP officers “will promptly share any terrorism information
encountered in the course of a border search with elements of the federal government responsible for
analyzing terrorist threat information.”
5. Can CBP agents ask for my thumbprint or passcode/PIN to unlock my electronic device, or for my email
or social media passwords?
Yes, even if you are a US citizen or a lawful permanent resident (LPR, or “green card” holder). The law on
whether you are legally required to comply is unsettled.
Regarding the information required to unlock your electronic device, it has been reported that CBP takes the
position that it has the right to obtain and keep passwords as necessary to facilitate digital searches of a
device that has been detained.
Regarding email and social media, some privacy experts contend that the “border search exception” would
not apply to a CBP search of online accounts because the data is hosted at data centers around the world, not
on the device carried through the border. However, this legal issue has not been settled, and as a practical
matter, once CBP gains access to your device, CBP will have access to your signed-in online applications
(Facebook, Twitter, etc.).
6. What if I refuse to provide my PIN or passwords?
If you are a US citizen, you cannot legally be denied entry into the United States, but you may be detained and
delayed, and there is a chance your phone, laptop, or other electronic device will be seized. If you are a lawful
permanent resident (LPR, or “green card” holder), in addition to the complications that a US citizen may face,
a hearing before an immigration judge might be required. If you are a foreign national (for example, a visa
3
holder), and you are perceived as failing to cooperate, CBP might deny you entry.
7. Might the government keep my phone, computer, or other electronic device?
The Directive authorizes the detention of electronic devices, or information copied from them, for “a brief,
reasonable period of time to perform a thorough border search,” whether conducted on- or off-site. Absent
“extenuating circumstances,” the detention of devices “ordinarily should not exceed five (5) days.”
8. What should I do if CBP asks to search my phone, laptop, or other electronic device, or for my
passwords?
CBP has the legal authority to perform a routine search of electronic devices that you carry across the border.
If CBP decides to question you, or inspect your electronic device(s), you should never lie to or attempt to
deceive CBP personnel, or try to obstruct the investigation (for example, by deleting data). CBP personnel are
federal agents, and lying to federal agents or knowingly interfering with their investigation is a crime.
Each individual should assess the risks and rewards of refusing a request from a CBP or ICE official. For Foreign
Nationals entering the United States, non-compliance can be grounds for the denial of entry and deportation.
For US citizens or legal residents, it may result in detainment of your device and/or costly delays to you (for
example, missed flights). If you have material on your device that you feel is sensitive or proprietary, it is
recommended that you tell the CBP/ICE agent this and ask that they take this into consideration when
conducting their search.
In conjunction with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, the AAUP is seeking
information from any faculty members who have had their cell phones or other electronic devices searched
by US border patrol officers at the nation’s borders while traveling internationally. If you have been subject to
such a search please send an email with a brief description of your experience if possible and your contact
information to
[email protected]. Your information will remain confidential.
9. What should I do to protect my data when traveling abroad?
If you do not want a particular electronic device searched, do not travel internationally with it. You should be
wary about including on a laptop that you take overseas any financial or other personal information that you
would not want viewed without your permission. If you need to travel internationally with electronic devices,
the safest course is to travel with devices that contain only the specific files needed for the trip. If your device
contains controlled software or sensitive data—particularly data that may be controlled under federal or state
law or regulations—it is recommended that you do not travel with it, especially internationally. If a device is to
be used only for making presentations, consider taking a memory stick or storing the presentation on a cloudbased
server instead. If you are using a device for other purposes (such as email), consider taking a “clean”
computer that does not include the restricted software, data, or other sensitive information.
10. Is the inspection of your IT device part of a new policy or law that Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents enforce?
4
No, the ability of Immigration and Customs officials to search your personal belongings when crossing a
border in order to ensure that no violation of US law has occurred is one of the key purposes of having
inspections at the points of entry and exit. With the increase in everyday use of technology by average
citizens, the expansion of searches into technological devices traveling with them occurred years ago. In 2013,
a DHS assessment of the practice claimed that the “clear and longstanding” authority “to conduct border
searches without suspicion or warrant” extends to searches of electronic devices, and that imposing a
reasonable suspicion requirement on such searches “would be operationally harmful without concomitant
civil rights/civil liberties benefits.” DHS therefore concluded that the Directive does not violate the Fourth
Amendment, and it rejected calls to adopt a reasonable suspicion standard as a policy choice.
11. How often do searches of electronic devices occur?
While the topic has hit social media venues quite a bit in early 2017 given a few high profile incidents,
according to the New York Times, the number of searches has been relatively low. In the article, a US Customs
agency spokesman quoted said that only "4,444 cellular phones and 320 other electronic devices were
inspected in 2015 which represented 0.0012 percent of the 383 million arrivals that year." However, the
article went on to suggest that there may have been significantly higher numbers in 2016.
(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/business/border-enforcement-airport-phones.html?_r=0)
12. What do I do if they detain my device?
If your device is detained, you will be given a receipt for it. Do not leave the airport without first having this
documentation. Further, it is recommended that you copy or take a photo of the serial numbers from each
device that you’ll be traveling with and leave a copy/photo with a colleague or family member at home. This is
also recommended for travelers in general as the serial numbers are helpful if a device is stolen while a
traveler is abroad. Serial numbers help in the identification of the device and tracking in the event that a
device is stolen or lost during detainment.
13. What should I do if a non-US (host country) border agent asks to inspect my device or requests my
password/login credentials?
As often happens in the immigration space, travelers may see reciprocal treatment when they reach the nonUS
destinations. Careful consideration should be given to what the risks are should you chose not to comply.
A follow-up report to the nearest US embassy or consulate is recommended. (If you are not a US citizen,
report the detainment to the embassy or consulate of your nation.)
The phone displayed the message, “Sorry, this media file doesn’t exist on your internal storage.” This problem did not occur before CBP’s search and seizure of the phone.
When he refused, the agents confiscated his laptop, smartphone, and camera, and told him it could be as long as a year before the government would return them.
When Ms. Merchant’s devices were returned to her, the Facebook application on her phone was displaying her friends list. That was not the case when she had given up the phone.
A few days later, while returning from a day trip to Canada, Mr. Shibly was again detained and told to hand over his phone. When he refused, three agents responded with force. One agent grabbed his neck and began to choke him while another held his arms and legs. The third agent reached into his pants’ pocket and took the phone. Mr. Shibly describes feeling severe pain and fearing for his life. At no point did he physically resist.
They also asked Mr. Kushkush for his social media identifiers and his email address.
After three hours, he was directed to a separate area, where he was questioned about his work as a journalist. After having spent a total of three and a half hours in the inspection area, he was released.
He continues to feel anxious about the fact that the government copied and retained sensitive materials concerning his journalistic work.
When the agent returned, he told Mr. Bikkannavar that they had used “algorithms” to search his phone — indicating they used forensic tools to capture and analyze the private information contained in the device, including emails, texts, and other private information.
. That is true in most economic areas, but particularly in "islands" such as New Zealand and Australia. There are quite a few limitations on fresh meat, fish...
