Author

Topic: Next year's 2023 food crisis will be different from this year's (Read 64 times)

legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
There have been reports for a long time that a lot of the UK's sewage ends up being dumped in rivers - I'm not sure why it doesn't get used to produce fertiliser (as long as it's used controllable as a biofuel too and the useful products are extracted - not the whole thing as that could cause a lot of contamination).


I may have read a little about that a few weeks ago:

Quote
“The eggs of most intestinal worms are pretty tough, otherwise you’d digest them and they’d never get to reproduce and infect other people,” says Mitchell, who was part of another team that recently found parasites in the 4,500 year-old poop left by the builders of Stonehenge. “The tough wall that stops you digesting them also makes it hard for soil fungi and bacteria to break these things down. So many of them can survive in soil for hundreds or thousands of years in the right kind of conditions.”

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/why-were-medieval-monks-so-susceptible-to-intestinal-worms-180980608/

Parasites and worms could be tough and durable enough. That its difficult to eliminate them. Without also sterilizing beneficial microbes and bacteria.

Farmers face similar issues with weeds. Herbicides powerful enough to kill weeds. Will usually kill crops and plants as well.

Human waste might be dried and burned to produce fertilizer ash. But using organic compost is a more efficient and a cleaner process.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1860
Interesting point cited here:

Quote
Russia accounted for almost one-fifth of 2021 fertilizer exports

That's actually less than 20%. That's just around 15%. It's still a big number but the rest of the global fertilizer producers could make up for that loss in case Russia plans to cut it completely and is determined to suffer from its losses. For now, Brazil, Russia's largest fertilizer importer, is now suffering from the effects of the invasion.

If worse comes to worse and people would start planting crops at their backyards, a number of alternatives could be used, ones that need not be produced in an industrial scale.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It seems that everything is going downhill since 2020, doesnt it?.

Also, wouldnt be possible if Russian fertilizers were purchased at discount by China and India, repacked and sold to European countries?
i have heard that is what India in doing with gas and oil, earning some money out of it.

All this situation sounds like a question of supply/demand, this high fertilizer prices should encourage new producers in the American and European continent to increase their capacities, specially if they manage to develop a competent product using no natural gas. I have read that human urine can serve as an effective fertilizer.



Source: https://www.epicgardening.com/urine-as-fertilizer/
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
There have been reports for a long time that a lot of the UK's sewage ends up being dumped in rivers - I'm not sure why it doesn't get used to produce fertiliser (as long as it's used controllable as a biofuel too and the useful products are extracted - not the whole thing as that could cause a lot of contamination).

I think there's also fears the drought that's hit most places now is going to destroy crop yields too. Russia might be able to offer attractive rates to Asia again though for food but I think the countries pushing sanctions on Russia should already have gone further as it's given them far too much time to strategise what they're going to do.

A lot of farms could immediately resolve some issues by having sheep, goats and pigs turn their soil too while they graze and as crops grow to give them higher yields and more fertiliser (while lowering the risk of external pathogens entering the fields from importing manure).
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Quote
The pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and the ensuing supply-chain chaos have collectively driven up the prices of everything from wheat and sunflower oil to lemons and avocados.

While the supply-chain has been in a state of disruption since the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2020, the dislocations have been compounded by the war between Russia and Ukraine, both of which are major wheat exporters. This has contributed to food inflation that's hitting the most vulnerable especially hard, according to Mercy Corps, a humanitarian organization that distributes aid to the needy globally.

"Skyrocketing food prices in 2022 have meant that the cash assistance we provide vulnerable families doesn't go as far," Tjada D'Oyen McKenna, the CEO of Mercy Corps, told Insider. "The main constraint to accessing food is decreased purchasing power coupled with increased food prices."

Last month, Ukraine and Russia reached an agreement brokered by the United Nations and Turkey that allows Ukraine to restart grain exports out of the Black Sea. The move has offered some relief to global markets: The UN Food and Agriculture Organization Food Price Index — which tracks a basket of commonly trade commodities — fell for the fourth consecutive month in July after hitting a record high earlier in 2022.

But, the price declines are unlikely to trickle down to the consumers immediately.

"While many food prices have been decreasing in recent weeks, with some returning to prewar levels, markets will continue to be volatile and even if global prices come down, local markets may not see price adjustments for upwards of a year," said McKenna.

And by then, we could see a new chapter in the food crisis that could push up prices again. Here's how the food crisis could change — for the worse — in 2023.

This year, it's a logistics problem. Next year, it could be a supply issue.

This year's food crisis is mostly due to a logistics disruption tied to issues in shipping Ukrainian and Russian grains out of the countries. But next year, the food supply itself could be in peril — particularly in Ukraine.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine, launched on February 24, threw a wrench into the annual farm cycle and disrupted the spring sowing season in April and May. Another sowing cycle takes place from September to November.

In July, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took to Twitter to warn that the country's farm harvest could be halved this year due to the war. "Ukrainian harvest this year is under the threat to be twice less," Zelenskyy tweeted.

In an August 17 report, consultancy firm McKinsey forecast a sharp drop in harvest volumes: It estimates Ukraine's production of grains, such as wheat, will drop by 35% to 45% in the next harvesting season.

"The ongoing conflict is interfering with farmers' ability to prepare fields, plant seeds, and protect and fertilize crops, which will likely result in even lower volumes next harvest season," McKinsey wrote in the report about global food security amid the Ukraine war and impact from climate change.

Per McKinsey forecasts, Ukraine's harvest will be 30 to 44 million tons below normal levels this year. This is due to fewer plantings on an acreage basis, reduced farmer cashflow as much of their last harvest can't be shipped, and the possibility of grain left untended or unharvested, the consultancy firm said.

"In the next planting season, due to the war's disruption of Ukrainian planting and harvesting and combined with less-than-optimal inputs into Russian, Brazilian, and other growing countries' crops, supply will likely tighten," wrote McKinsey. The consultancy interviewed local growers and reviewed local data for its report.

Soaring fertilizer prices and climate change add to supply shock

Russia accounted for almost one-fifth of 2021 fertilizer exports, but the war in Ukraine has caused severe disruption to the supply of crop nutrient. Prices of urea, a common nitrogen fertilizer, have more than doubled from a year ago, according to Bloomberg's Green Markets service. As a result, farmers around the world are using less fertilizer.

"Fertilizer shortages and higher prices for fertilizers are also expected to reduce yields in countries that depend heavily on fertilizer imports, such as Brazil. This will likely further decrease the volume of grain on the world market," McKinsey wrote in its report.

Mercy Corps has observed the same trend. "Farmers we work with in Guatemala have been unable to invest in the next production cycle either because they cannot afford to buy fertilizers and other inputs derived from oil, such as plastics for padding and pipes for irrigation systems, or because they cannot find agricultural inputs in the market," said McKenna.

Given that the shocks to farming and supply come at a time of extreme climate conditions, including severe droughts in Europe and floods in Australia, McKinsey expects the next food crisis to be worse than those in 2007 to 2008, and from 2010 to 2011.

"The conflict in Ukraine is shaking important pillars of the global food system in an already precarious context," the consultancy said.



https://www.businessinsider.com/next-food-crisis-supply-logistics-war-fertilizer-prices-harvest-2022-8


....


Interesting point cited here:

Quote
Russia accounted for almost one-fifth of 2021 fertilizer exports

Crop fertilizer is synthesized from natural gas. Russia being a major exporter of natural gas could make their transition to fertilizer markets a natural progression which can be logically deduced.

It would seem that russia has spent many years angling itself towards becoming an owner and producer of natural resources. To make other nations dependent on them in preparation for eventual economic warfare.

Anyway, this claims that next year's crop yields in europe (2023) could be significantly lower than this years (2022).

Now could be a good time to find ways to boost local food production. To prepare for future shortages.
Jump to: