Topic: null (Read 3509 times)
I love to see your flags and proof of that statement then?
-v 2 -w 256 -I 8
and proof that 390 @ 940 is low?
Show your MH/s @940.
actually I think i misremembered (sold it a few weeks ago), it was 370mh/s with cgminer, 905/300. 390mh/s@940 core sounds like you have flags or something set wrong.
and 370 / 905 * 940 = 
. Oh. I love to see your flags and proof of that statement then?
-v 2 -w 256 -I 8
actually I think i misremembered (sold it a few weeks ago), it was 370mh/s with cgminer, 905/300. 390mh/s@940 core sounds like you have flags or something set wrong.
I love to see your flags and proof of that statement then?
fwiw I got up to 390mh/s without overvolting on my 5850, think I used 905 core and 300 mem.
950/300 you meant
You sir, have a stick up your ass.
And you're not happy because its not your stick?
Dumb ass, we know because 390mh/s from 5850 is only with 940-950core range.
Kid, this forum isn't a place for angsty-teen attitudes. Regardless of my intelligence, I'm sure many would agree that your calling everyone a dumb ass and correcting them isn't constructive in the least.
Cheers.
Was your comment contructive?
Learn to be called a dumb ass because you can only make stupid comment.
fwiw I got up to 390mh/s without overvolting on my 5850, think I used 905 core and 300 mem.
950/300 you meant
You sir, have a stick up your ass.
And you're not happy because its not your stick?
Dumb ass, we know because 390mh/s from 5850 is only with 940-950core range.
Kid, this forum isn't a place for angsty-teen attitudes. Regardless of my intelligence, I'm sure many would agree that your calling everyone a dumb ass and correcting them isn't constructive in the least.
Cheers.
Dumb ass, we know because 390mh/s from 5850 is only with 940-950core range.
ZOMG somebody made a typo on the interwebs. Get the pitchforks and torches! Kill it with flames!
fwiw I got up to 390mh/s without overvolting on my 5850, think I used 905 core and 300 mem.
950/300 you meant
You sir, have a stick up your ass.
And you're not happy because its not your stick?
Dumb ass, we know because 390mh/s from 5850 is only with 940-950core range.
fwiw I got up to 390mh/s without overvolting on my 5850, think I used 905 core and 300 mem.
950/300 you meant
You sir, have a stick up your ass.
fwiw I got up to 390mh/s without overvolting on my 5850, think I used 905 core and 300 mem.
950/300 you meant
Most of my cards are not set to 965. Right now none mine higher than 850 but I will be seeing what they can do in the next few days. Now I know what to shoot for:)
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock. Unless you don't pay for your electricity, there's likely a point of reversed returns where you'll be losing more money in increased electrical costs than you would be gaining from the overclock.I'd be interested to see some more detailed analysis on that though.
You're clueless as a door knob,
Do you know what the word "exponentially" means?
What detailed analysis do you need? Pull out a damn meter and do some test.
Yes its exponentially difficult to understand.
2) Yes.
3) I don't have a meter, or I would.
4) It cannot be exponentially difficult to understand. It's really rather simple, I just don't have the equipment to do it.
Base on your definition of exponentially, its correct to say so.
Yeah, you dont have a meter but somehow you can draw a conclusion of
Quote
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock
Thanks for confirming my point.... which is... you're as smart as a door knob.
Apparently it does not fit. It only fits reference 5850s and 5870s (and probably one bank of vrms on a 5970).
This one should fit:
http://www.quietpc.com/gb-en-gbp/products/vgacoolers/gel-icy-vision-enhan-kit
But it will need a fan and is probably nowhere near an R5.
This one should fit:
http://www.quietpc.com/gb-en-gbp/products/vgacoolers/gel-icy-vision-enhan-kit
But it will need a fan and is probably nowhere near an R5.
Nope, ambient is ~20C. Im using a Thermalright Spitfire (+VRM R5) on that card. Its not the most cost effective nor space effective solution, but boy, it sure does work!
I wonder if that VRM cooler would fit my 6950? I have a GPU only block, so I had to home make a HS for my VRM's...
I bet that would do the job nicely though.
Quote
Very nice...Very nice.
What, do you mine in a walk-in freezer?
What, do you mine in a walk-in freezer?
Nope, ambient is ~20C. Im using a Thermalright Spitfire (+VRM R5) on that card. Its not the most cost effective nor space effective solution, but boy, it sure does work!
Most of my cards are not set to 965. Right now none mine higher than 850 but I will be seeing what they can do in the next few days. Now I know what to shoot for:)
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock. Unless you don't pay for your electricity, there's likely a point of reversed returns where you'll be losing more money in increased electrical costs than you would be gaining from the overclock.I'd be interested to see some more detailed analysis on that though.
You're clueless as a door knob,
Do you know what the word "exponentially" means?
What detailed analysis do you need? Pull out a damn meter and do some test.
Yes its exponentially difficult to understand.
2) Yes.
3) I don't have a meter, or I would.
4) It cannot be exponentially difficult to understand. It's really rather simple, I just don't have the equipment to do it.
Most of my cards are not set to 965. Right now none mine higher than 850 but I will be seeing what they can do in the next few days. Now I know what to shoot for:)
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock. Unless you don't pay for your electricity, there's likely a point of reversed returns where you'll be losing more money in increased electrical costs than you would be gaining from the overclock.I'd be interested to see some more detailed analysis on that though.
You're clueless as a door knob,
Do you know what the word "exponentially" means?
What detailed analysis do you need? Pull out a damn meter and do some test.
Yes its exponentially difficult to understand.
40° or less...Water cooling dominates. 
I beg to differ. 5870. No water involved:
[Img snipped]
Very nice...Very nice.
What, do you mine in a walk-in freezer?
Mine used to hold 32-35, but I think I need to clean my blocks. It's been over a year.
40° or less...Water cooling dominates.
I beg to differ. 5870. No water involved:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
My 6950 gets 420
I'm assuming you've got a shader-unlocked 6950? I couldn't push mine above ~360MH/s with the stock shader counts..
Yes, so that isn't exactly a fair comparison, but I know that stock 5850's out hash stock 6950's due to the shader count. So, I thought it would still be a good basis to use. It's clocked at 935/1000/stock voltage/40° or less...Water cooling dominates.
Thats a really nice overclock, but I wouldnt take it for granted.
I would never...
It runs at 990 for a few hours, but has no significant gain over 980Mhz. 980 runs for 4-8hrs before crash/dead miner. 975 makes it about 1-2 days, but I got tired of checking and restarting so I settled at 965 which runs indefinitely.
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock.
Incorrect. It scales linearly with clockspeed, so MH/W remains the same, or even increases for the entire rig. Its only when overvolting that you dramatically increase power consumption.
Nope! No extra volts. I try not to overvolt too often, ever since I fried my Kill a watt with only two rigs plugged in to it!
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock.
Incorrect. It scales linearly with clockspeed, so MH/W remains the same, or even increases for the entire rig. Its only when overvolting that you dramatically increase power consumption.
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock.
Incorrect. Power consumption scales linearly with clockspeed, so MH/W efficiency remains the same, or even increases slightly for the entire rig (as cpu, motherboard etc remain the same). Its only when overvolting that you dramatically increase power consumption and reduce efficiency.
Hmm, Mine doesn't even have voltage control and it gets 400Mh/s @965/450 mid 70°'s
Thats a really nice overclock, but I wouldnt take it for granted. I have one 5850 that will do ~920 (MSI twin frozr II) and one thats barely stable @870 (Sapphire) . Temps for both around 60C, stock voltage (neither supports overvolting). A third Powercolor reference 5850 that has died since, would hit no more than 850 even with slight overvolting.
My 5870 will do 1 GHz stock voltage (at 32C
).Anyway, agreed that they are great cards.
Most of my cards are not set to 965. Right now none mine higher than 850 but I will be seeing what they can do in the next few days. Now I know what to shoot for:)
Keep in mind that the wattage usage goes up exponentially when you overclock. Unless you don't pay for your electricity, there's likely a point of reversed returns where you'll be losing more money in increased electrical costs than you would be gaining from the overclock.I'd be interested to see some more detailed analysis on that though.
My 6950 gets 420
I'm assuming you've got a shader-unlocked 6950? I couldn't push mine above ~360MH/s with the stock shader counts..
They are over volted and that really hurts your electrical costs. Still 5850s are a decent card. I have 16 of them:)
Hmm, Mine doesn't even have voltage control and it gets 400Mh/s @965/450 mid 70°'s
Good price regardless! I'd buy'em if I was still expanding my operation.
Jump to: