Please take this information and post it in the Beta Discussion on the new site.
Done, thanks. 
Topic: Number of posts showing incorrectly, et al. (Read 1033 times)
This is some good feedback. We'll be addressing these issues and we take security very seriously. Please take this information and post it in the Beta Discussion on the new site. Thanks again for your feedback.
When I access my account on Epochtalk the number of posts that my profile shows that I have is 27,077 verses roughly 9,000 on bitcointalk. This results in several pages of "blank"/nothing at the end (highest page numbering) of my post history.
This does not appear to be limited to myself looking at my own account. Looking at theymos's account, on bitcointalk his public post count is roughly 7,100 verses 30,862 on Epochtalk.
I suspect that the discrepancy has something to do with the number of PM's in my inbox/outbox as I have roughly 9,640 PMs in my inbox and roughly 8,960 in my outbox, including roughly 80 that I had cc'ed my QS account on. These figures plus my current post count work out to roughly 27,600. This works out to my PM + post count to be roughly 600 more then my displayed post count on Epochtalk. The PM + public post count on Panthers52 is similarly roughly 600 more then the public post count on Epochtalk, however on ACCTseller it is roughly 200 less then my public post count on Epochtalk.
I had received a PM from someone via Epochtalk, however I did not receive any kind of notification in my email associated with my account.
The "@" and the "globe" buttons at the top do not seem to do anything however they show up as being "clickable" on my computer.
I am able to change my email address without entering my password which is a potential security risk
I cannot seem to be able to reply to this thread. The button to reply to threads is very non-obvious.
It looks like if someone's username has changed then Epochtalk will only display their original username. I noticed that Blazed is showing up as blazedout419 and mitchell is showing up as bitcoininformation.
I do not automatically watch a thread after I post to it, and I do not see a "Show new replies to your posts" link.
My PM's do not appear to have transferred over in a way that I can view them.
It does not appear that the rankings of those who are legendary have transferred over (maybe this is due to the confidential nature of the formula to become legendary)
This does not appear to be limited to myself looking at my own account. Looking at theymos's account, on bitcointalk his public post count is roughly 7,100 verses 30,862 on Epochtalk.
I suspect that the discrepancy has something to do with the number of PM's in my inbox/outbox as I have roughly 9,640 PMs in my inbox and roughly 8,960 in my outbox, including roughly 80 that I had cc'ed my QS account on. These figures plus my current post count work out to roughly 27,600. This works out to my PM + post count to be roughly 600 more then my displayed post count on Epochtalk. The PM + public post count on Panthers52 is similarly roughly 600 more then the public post count on Epochtalk, however on ACCTseller it is roughly 200 less then my public post count on Epochtalk.
I had received a PM from someone via Epochtalk, however I did not receive any kind of notification in my email associated with my account.
The "@" and the "globe" buttons at the top do not seem to do anything however they show up as being "clickable" on my computer.
I am able to change my email address without entering my password which is a potential security risk
It looks like if someone's username has changed then Epochtalk will only display their original username. I noticed that Blazed is showing up as blazedout419 and mitchell is showing up as bitcoininformation.
I do not automatically watch a thread after I post to it, and I do not see a "Show new replies to your posts" link.
My PM's do not appear to have transferred over in a way that I can view them.
It does not appear that the rankings of those who are legendary have transferred over (maybe this is due to the confidential nature of the formula to become legendary)
Jump to: