Topic: Nutildah & Royse's allegation| Little Mouse, RaptarX & Small Rabbit Connection (Read 891 times)

1- He sent me funds, I used (What's the link here)?
2- I gave the reason for it, too; if I had asked when the connection between me and Smokerface was made, I most likely would've said, you don't store logs or trades for years.
3- No
4- For review, yes; campaign, no.
5- Yes, the chat also happened during that time.
6- You don't have to repeat the 1st and 5th points and make a combined 6th.

The trial would be that you're the same person as someone who clearly promoted scams and generally was not considered trustworthy by many trustworthy individuals in the forum.


I'm probably going to stop posting here as this has taken up a bit more time that I expected.

Here's what I think are the facts:
- The single blockchain transaction is a transaction that undeniably linked the SmokerFace/worldofcoins accounts together.
- worldofcoins gave no information to explain how the link is not the same person (PMs, chat logs, public posts/topics, and so on).
- Both accounts have been caught cheating signature campaigns by post recycling.
- Both accounts have been paid by 1xbit (a scam casino).
- The linking transaction happened right after both accounts were paid by the 1xbit signature campaign.
- The linking transaction shows that SmokerFace sent to worldofcoins, then worldofcoins sent to worldofcoins' exchange/gambling platform/etc all in the same Bitcoin block.

Based on these facts, I think it's time to close this thread and move on worldofcoins, but that's just me.

Why would I be on trial for someone who did whatever they did and just happened to have a few chats and trades?

As far as trial goes: The judge would have access to my bank accounts, not just for one single trade. (If I had 2 bank accounts, then surely they can be linked), Did smokerface sent all their earnings to me or just one?, If it's latter then I don't know would you hang someone for a couple of or just one trade.

No, I was not trolling you. I am liable for what I say, not what you understand. Can you quote it?

Also, You gave me "Bounty Cheater" feedback. Would you please explain which bounty I cheated on? - Talking about literacy here, I might not be as literate as you, but what cheated bounty are we talking about here?, I am sure literate person would understand the meaning of "Bounty"?

Edit: Did you take me for Small Rabbit's alt?

So you did one trade (which you have no record or recollection of) with SmokerFace that just happened to fall at the same time of you both getting paid for the same signature campaign...and in addition, were both using this tactic where you would recycle posts by copying them and reposting them?

I'll ask the same question that went unanswered in a slightly different way again not only because I want to know, but it might help you accept that your feedback probably isn't going to be removed:
if you were on trial right now, with all evidence and lack of explanations for evidence considered, do you think that you would be ruled innocent or guilty?


your*
lol, sorry, had to...

Insisting on referring to me using plural pronouns and making up phrases in attempt to insult me aren't arguments.  It's trolling.  If you don't know the difference between arguing and attempting to insult some one your ignorance goes beyond just being illiterate.

I don't keep history for occasional traders, but I might still have access to the address he sent the funds. (I will have to check), I don't want to reveal much about how I operate my trades, but I am afraid there's no data left of this user, to give (If you or someone else asked me this before, Then I might have had for sure given it) - But why didn't anyone ask me back then?

No, the guy deleted his account. So, I had to close the chat.

So you have no chat logs, no PMs, no public posts or threads that you can go back and look at/show us for reference? Usually when two completely separate individuals trade with each other, then communication is involved? The trade was worth approximately 62 USD at the time, does that not help? What kind of trades were you doing at the time?

It's quite a convenient time to just forget about the details of this trade. The most important question for yourself is, if you were on trial right now, do you think the blockchain evidence combined with your last statement implies guilt, or innocence?

I don't remember exactly what this transaction was for, but I've traded altcoins with the person and even took loans. (Smokerface isn't the only person I've traded with like I said).
If you specifically want me to tell which altcoins?, then I don't know which it was - If someone had questioned me this when they were tagging Smokerface, and this blockchain question was raised, then I would've answered it, but now, it's not feasible.

Nothing you've said in your last post has explaned why SmokerFace sent you the BTC, as I asked prior. It's key to understanding your relationship with SmokerFace and your defense, in my opinion. I'd suggest using less words and talking about irrelevant topics, and just answering the question bluntly.


Trust is not based on certainty or fact, especially here in bitcointalk. Go and look at my profile for example, where JollyGood says that I applied for a campaign for a scam mixer "whilst knowing it was a scam" when my judgement on it probably being a scam came many months after I applied for the campaign. Does that mean it will get removed? no. Or, go look at icopress's feedback on me, where he calls me a troll, then go look at all of my posts and tell me if that matches who I am on this forum. Is that fact or certainty? No...he's just retaliating because I started to call him out on his (in my opinion) shady practices, and that was his way of using his power to discredit and silence me. There's no question there's corruption in the trust system on this forum, however the difference between my feedbacks and yours, is that blockchain evidence has proven that you are connected with SmokerFace, validating that you are more than likely to be the same person...So far, not much of what you have said has overpowered the blockchain evidence that you are both connected, or explained the relationship, and it seems that you are very likely to be the same person.

I'm trying to offer you the opportunity to give some reasonable explanations (such as, what the transaction between SmokerFace and yourself was), however so far you are passing up that opportunity with quite irrelevant jibber jabber in my opinion. My advice? Start by bluntly explaining the transaction between SmokerFace and yourself as suggested by answering this question:
Why did SmokerFace (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) send you (worldofcoins) (bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) in this transaction?

I don't remember how I traded it, but most likely, yes not (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) | This one I own: bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) (The one smokerface sent to). (Look at the justification below to clear your mind, too)

This is how I see it going through:
bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9 (Smokerface) -> bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9 (My wallet) -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68 (My exchange, service, p2p)

---

Even smokerface mentioned it, they sent to the address. But they never claimed it to sent to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" | They explicitly mentioned whoever owns the address they sent the funds to, person owning that address have sent to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" (I didn't wanted my name mentioned at time, smokerface understood), but anyway it has come to light then this explanation should clear everything.


Tigerfirst tried to cause confusion with this post, Royse somehow believes whatever this person says, they even gave merit to one of their posts.


Smokerface nowhere claimed they sent to the exchange address "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5"  (They didn't even mention it was the exchange address, even if they had then i might have told them, but most likely didn't tell them about what I am going to do with our traded bitcoins)

---

If I am intentionally not being targeted, everything should be clear now, and people who gave me Negative for my Smokerface being my alt should revert their feedback.

Can we not consider "probable certainty" but use feedback on 100% certainty in blockchain cases?

You've admitted to having ownership of bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9

SmokerFace (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) sent 0.00060960 BTC to you (worldofcoins) (bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) in this transaction.

The blockchain proves at a minimum that you received 0.00060960 BTC directly from SmokerFace. What's the relationship between you both? There is no denying that there is one, as you clearly transacted with each other in the linked transaction.




https://archive.is/yYtUz

Sure, You're involving yourself in the drama, so you're free to enunciate or use pronouns, no worries.

Don't mind me, I just heard there was a brewing DT drama involving a shadowy cabal of gender-confused mammals and I figured I should do my part. Do I get new pronouns in this one, too?

No.
Blockchain evidence doesn't prove me being Smokerface, nutildah mentioned username similarities, I've explained it too!, there are no similarities in usernames. (But some Mammals have it, what other reasons do you need to tag them, considering you're ok with that reason to tag, even though my username similarities are nill compared to them).
People who group and abuse their DT status need at least a mention in their profile. I know people who look for legitimate feedback, disregarding it's given from a DT member, or not.

Are you threatening people who have left negative feedback on your profile? What will happen after three days? Are you going to tag them? I assume you have the ability to understand that your feedback is not going to do any harm. This is not a good way to convince people. Your mood swing surprises me. Sometimes you seem too polite, and sometimes too aggressive. Stop this please and show some good arguments that may change their mind. Your threat is not going to scare anyone.

Seriously? You cannot distinguish between argument and trolling?, where does lauda tagging for similar blockchain connection like mine has to do with trolling and where 1xBit manager writing royse text.

Turning my arguments in troll statements is a good to way to divert attention.

If you're trying to troll me I have to warn you; trolling wars are my specialty.  I'll have you crying yourself to sleep every night for a month of Sundays.

But before I step into my hip waders, I'd like to remind you that one of the excuses and flimsy arguments you made to distance yourself from "smokerface" was that he was a troll, and you're not.  Still pressing that argument, or not?

worldofcoins should be removed from any campaign! I just PMed his manager with a link to this thread.

I will refer to you as 'them'. You're free to quote out that part and write whatever you want.


Sure, consider it an excuse, then. You were part of the group? By the way, 1xBit manager Mr. Goonie mentioned Royse's writing style, RaptarX, and Little Mouse had a similar connection in the address that Lauda also tagged.

Is there any particular reason to target me only? - I hurt the person you respect. "Mr. Literate Wannabae?"

Stop referring to me as "them."  Like most schizophrenics, each of my personalities is very possessive and territorial.


I have gone through the evidence, and I have made my decision.  I've been quietly following this drama for a couple of days now, and as always, I'm very selective with my feedback.  You've provided nothing but excuses and flimsy arguments, while others have presented considerably viable evidence.

You're the person I most expected a reply from. No worries, this is a request, I won't tag LB for the given duration, make you decision  

And, as far as making comparisons between accounts goes, no matter someone's DT or not, if they can't do it properly, then they shouldn't rely on targeting the person who traded with someone (Given the proof and justifications for the trades are stated).

You sounds helpless.
You are trolling the forum for years and now you are asking if anyone see you trolling? Should I make a compilation of your troll?  I don’t think so. nutildah gave you a second chance a long time ago which you didn’t take and trolled the whole forum. It has a consequences and You have to accept it.

There is a dramatic changes in your writing style for last two days. I believes everyone notices that. You are behaving like a "good dog" instead of barking.

You are focusing more on findings others mistakes while you supposed to fix your owns.

@DireWolfM14, Nutildah, and everyone who gave me negative feedback. Do you see me talking like this person, using slang and trolling (Anywhere)? It's clear that SmokerFace and me (worldofcoins) clearly aren't same.



I have personally sent PM Direwolf requesting them to revisit their feedback on my profile, and the same is the request from Nutildah (from them, it's public); I don't know if Don or Learn Bitcoin is doing it or not, so I won't bother asking them if they do then good, otherwise no need, I will wait for 3 days.

The evidence, justification, and proofs I've laid out in this thread solve every doubt of me (not) being Smokerface, and I don't want to be associated with someone who's not me, As I've stated before, I've not done anything wrong, so consider this as a request, go through everything I've laid out, make your decision.

That's all I have to say.

Yes, it's possible the person won't explain why it happened. But still, it seemed all staged; They even had trouble with Spiroll paying Royse money for the contest. I lost money in Spiroll, where the contest started with Royse (I don't want that money if my intent seems that way. The person has no issue regarding boasting about the money they make; it seems everything to them).



Considering Spiroll used their alt to participate in their contest, I wanted to look for deleted posts too in the contest, but nvm. I won't be wasting my time with it.


I explicitly mentioned, "I have no problem with it"

But the person opened a thread against me, targeting me in a thread and referencing my posts and other stats. Naturally, I was going to retaliate.

---

Sure, np let me clear it for you.

[1] Do you mean, nicknames "SmokerFace", and "worldofcoins"? (First one seems to resemble the face of someone who smokes, and the second one resembles theme "world of coins") - Both usernames aren't the same nicknames.

[2] I don't know about Smokerface, but my beef with Royse, LM, and SR began after the mammal connection; it seemed to make sense what Smokerface wrote, and a few texts we discussed in a private group, discussions were *not only* focused on campaign managers, I agreed with a few point of views SF had, others also believed SF, but were concerned would community consider this as proof, then I seemed to connect dots of LearnBitcoin getting address of Little Mouse, Royse having the address of Small Rabbit, it's natural these dots seemed to point somewhere, Then mammal user names, and so on.  - But I haven't tagged them solely because of this connection; you can check; I use ratings very responsibly.

[3] Sure, np. Let me clear up the possible but not absolute blockchain connection for you, too.

Since you asked politely, no, I don't. Looks like he was just performing a task delegated to him by the Spiroll account.


In the 2nd contest - the one that led to the downfall of Spiroll - the winner was never credited with their winnings.

These contests are over 2 years old and had only a handful of participants. Reviewing the contest in question, you would have lost to a different entrant anyway.

Looks like you started beef with Royse777 apropos of nothing here, which led to him creating this thread, which then led to you creating multiple threads about him.

You should be given Sherlock of the Year award, btw say that with your "Learn Bitcoin" account, you used to tag me.


I don't bother wasting time on a few spread sheet managing gang, who use morals as a tool to show themselves good and use that to gain connections, for financial benefits.

I can't stop laughing seeing how Worldofcoins trying to prove him innocent after JollyGood's post. Helpless!

JollyGood acting like an ascetic here as if he never tagged people for this kind of offence. As if he need more evidence to tag worldofcoins. But the reality is, worldofcoins thought to become a servant of JollyGood after getting tagged on his SmokerFace account, so JollyGood never doubt him.

Interesting!


Do you think you will ever get a chance to deal with them?

When you deal with someone through DMs you normally exchange texts, try to view their viewpoints, and a lot more. (And yes, i could be smokerface too, there's no possibility denying that too).



Please tell me honestly, do you believe Royse honestly didn't rig Spiroll's contest?, they awarded the prize money to the alt of the casino whose casino they were managing - The alt account didn't win the contest, but the prize amount was awarded, and the winner complained about it (Nothing happened, Royse didn't even took responsibility of it) (Did SmokerFace provide this evidence too, or took part in that contest like me?)

Even if you and I overlook these past allegations against royse, I am sure they will get themselves into the trouble, the way they're operating.

I don't see myself dealing with Royse, Little Mouse, or their group in the future. (If someone is interested in taking over the investigation I started, then they're welcome to take the material I've provided. and reasons me believing it to be the case)

Update: Feedback revised.

That's all I have to say.

There's too many other coincidences for me to believe you're not the same person as SmokerFace: the use of the same nicknames, the shared obsession with attacking the reputation of certain campaign managers, and last but not least the other blockchain connections that have been mentioned in other threads.


Yeah, absolutely, that's obviously what you should have done, instead of attacking not just campaign managers but DT members with unfounded accusations. If you were a newb account and you repeatedly made the same baseless accusations, harassing DT over stuff out of their control, then you could have been tagged for that on its own.

Also like SmokerFace, the evidence that you used for these accusations was very weak. I don't really know what you were thinking.

Yes, that last address, either belongs to my exchange, p2p trader, or gambling website (I don't have access to that wallet info anymore, given the amount of time elapsed)

This is how, I trade off-forum:

"bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9", and "bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc" (Also belong to me most likely).
The later address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" (I don't know of which site is, but it most likely belong to account, or someone other than SF I traded with or had a deal with, I deal with a lot of people so I don't know who that might be, I could've provided logs if the person if from a p2p exchange, or a trade through dm but it would consume unnecessary time, and cannot guarantee I will find that person).

The transactions made to "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68", from both addresses above, are through unconfirmed inputs from  addresses of same wallet (most likely) (I could've preferred to wait, and send them separately) or I could've given sf that direct address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" to send the funds to, but I wanted to do it through my address (considering there, if any verification takes place, for the trade I did with 'h68' address, I can cite my owned address which send funds to it, I do it mostly with everyone, I trade occasionally.



It looks that way, no doubt, considering you gave me/our a second chance in the past. Did you see my scumbag activity on my/our account (worldofcoins) post that event?, But once my beef with Royse started, which he began when I was hired, you too understand that, but why did you have to support him? The person locked his thread on me (showing only his viewpoint); I made a self-moderated thread, and you were allowed to post there, there were others whose posts i didn't delete, but the discussion in other thread revolved around users "Tiger ifst", and his + lm's campaign participants, the picture it painted was clear.
The person kept attacking me after he made that thread on me.

Was I supposed to "keep my head down" like you stated? If that's what you mean you would've done that in my every beef against royse, or anyone you preferred (under the guise of guiding me, using smokerface incident), then would I be focusing on the beef, or consider the safety, and rep. of my account?, Because i will have to keep the possibility of you keep brining this incident every now and the?



I realized the part about nutildah not having any ill-intention towards me. (They were right about some part, but for the others about making a rule for not allowing others to defend royse, but wouldn't it make sense If my allegations are against someone they should be the one clearing those not someone baby sit them through the process?), I will revise the feedback I granted them.



I did not mean they directly contacted the manager (but the tag they gave me would be seen and would impact my stay)



Yes, it's plausible that most will not find this evidence compelling, but when invention through government, and private agencies take place, then they don't rely only on transaction details, they consider many other factors (for apparent reasons we cannot perform here on the forum), though irl people will most likely won't get away after pulling these stunts.

---

Seems that way.

---

I believe I have cleared everything regarding my connection with Smokerface (let me know if anything is left), so everyone who tagged me for it should consider it and revise the tag they've granted me.

Not just mammals, specific types of mammals; rodents.

Obviously someone is trolling you.

I posted this in the other thread then thought it was better placed here instead.

A validation or reference for nutildah is not required as his record in this forum speaks for itself but after seeing recent comments made against him I wanted to make a post. Please note, he does not hand out negative tags on a whim even though he has been a member of the community for a very long time. Also, from an earlier post it seems he did advise you some time ago yet you disregarded his advice even though he probably had collated information that suggested/pointed you had other accounts yet never published it.

Clearly you came to the wrong conclusion about him because the idea that he would blindly support a campaign manager for any reason including for being allowed to join a campaign is not only ludicrous but somewhat insulting. I do not believe he would write to managers asking them to add/remove participants therefore I would advise you to remove the negative tag you gave him because it is completely unwarranted.

As far as the issue on hand is concerned, I see it in two ways. The first is what you are mentioning about collusion and collaboration (with negative connotations) mostly between members from a particular local board and a particular campaign manager. The other being your use of accounts. If evidence suggests you have another account including one that has negative tags (including from me) and you wish to contest the claim, you will have to compile a meaning defence for others to read and evaluate it or you can simply accept the tags and move on.

Having said that, you have exerted a lot of energy trying to connect various accounts that could be up to no good and I know that can be frustrating when solid evidence is difficult to find. For example, various names have been mentioned in PMs between certain members regarding who is (or probably is) an alt-account or part of an account farming ring but even though some us know who they are, their names have not been made public because the evidence thus far is not strong enough.

It is possible you got frustrated and openly mentioned a number of members that might or might not be connected in a negative manner without compelling evidence (though there might be circumstantial), when maybe being patient until you collated something substantial could have been the appropriate step. I am aware part of the problem is that they are getting better at leaving less trails behind therefore it does not help when you want to present a case but lashing out in either anger or frustration will not help and only brings more attention to yourself. Maybe that was what nutildah advised you about in the past in the spirit of second chances.

Good catch. Except its worth pointing out that both addresses sent the funds to a "hop" address before the exchange address to break the connection. So it looks like this:

bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9 -> bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9 -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68

bc1qvx09jg7glgx68xlckwt5n5a5q69sw45txngew4 -> bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68

As all 4 transactions were confirmed in the same block, little doubt remains that both these accounts are controlled by the same person. Especially when taken into consideration the other transactions connecting these accounts.

---

Whatever you are accusing Royse777 of doesn't change the fact that you're the alt of a more-or-less scumbag account. Also, I would have done the same regardless of what campaign I'm currently involved in, given our history.

Why would I be mentioning my name knowing full well, i will -ve tagged if i manage it?

Btw this username, you chose to create a new account, Golden Hamster (Mammal) -> Was it intentional after going through my mammal theory of "Little Mouse", "Hedgehog", or "Small Rabbit"?

What are the chances worldofcoins = CryptoGoonie?

Oddly specific recommendation:

@Hixxkaxx, thank you for the message.

Post made by cryptogoonie (1xbit manager): https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5527021

Later on, deleted (Archive): https://ninjastic.space/post/64979026
Royse mentioned a reply to "Tiger Fist" (Good to note)
In another quote, reply to "Don Pedro Dinero" (He distrusted me too, I am certain now more members will connect the dots and see what's going on.)

The post was later deleted, but it proves one thing: "Don Pedro Dinero" was ignorant about Royse's true nature, and so was Nutildah (most likely).

---

Picture:

1xbit.com honest review campaign (open)




2021-07-14 16:56:18

Txid: b83811b8bbcd70dc8347b836ee6c3d309f09c52f84804484598f1ee3dcec9874  [payment from 1xbit]

2021-07-15 04:31:08

bc1qvx09jg7glgx68xlckwt5n5a5q69sw45txngew4  ->  3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68
bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9  ->  3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68


https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/415821a8f7f96777fa7149dcda6ede1eb79bf3d77417ae16ed240cf8a265cc0d
https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/300427cd5ae0c739f6c295f8ee84e0fd85b30814e0eaf93f78e317671b529771


========================================================================================================================

User SmokerFace - Recycling posts for sig campaign, new way of cheating ?




Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/56188603 [2021-01-26 04:20:41 UTC]
Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/55629018 [2020-11-19 07:45:06 UTC]




Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/56188597 [2021-01-26 04:19:43 UTC]
Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/55611803 [2020-11-17 07:22:36 UTC]





Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/56188567 [2021-01-26 04:13:55 UTC]
Deleted and reposted: https://ninjastic.space/post/55702766 [2020-11-28 14:27:32 UTC]

Everyone on 'that' thread is following the gender, OP stated. Did anyone have a chat with their gender?, I am not entirely sure on the gender part, but user is with feminine tone, if they state their gender themselves then good, otherwise lets not take it further than this post.

Not that I care about nutildah's gender but I have questioned what you say and I see in this thread that I am not the only one referring to him/her as 'he'.

This thread is for their feedback justification on the front page.; they locked theirs, the other one I made was against their Scam casino 'Bitlucy,' and rigged contest of 'Spiroll and Account Buying Allegations.

I don't know why people who tagged me overlooked what Royse did or if they are scared to take the initiative.

You're making too many threads about this. You should limit your gripes with Royse777 to just one topic.

nutildah is a female, not 'he'.

As far as reputation goes, if I asked my campaign members politely to give me feedback, then I am sure the majority would've done that, but I chose not to.

awww, my little baby is crying 

Why didn't you answer the point Don Pedro Dinero raised?
You said, you were trading with SmokerFace, but SmokerFace said you both use the same exchange.
But according to the blockchain activity and data, those addresses are inactive and did not made many transactions.

Come on! Stop being ridiculous

I don't know the other guy but I can assure you that both nutildah and I (I told you in the other thread) if we find out that someone in our campaign is an alt of someone who has 10 red tags we won't hesitate to do the same.

In the case of nutildah I think he has a reputation that he has earned over the years, a reputation in general and for catching cheaters like you. He does not red tag someone lightly.

This is not self-moderated, so everyone can post.

This is a post for which justification is for |
Current members who tagged me:

• Learn Bitcoin (Royse's friend's campaign, littlemouse)
• Nutildah. (Royse's campaign member of Betfury)
• Don Pedro Dinero (Royse's campaign member Betfury)

---

Yes, anything wrong with it?


No, I am not with this theory. LittleMouse, Small Rabbit, RaptarX, and hedgehog1  in fact, are the same person


Here user mammal (hedgehog1) started to praise Little Mouse management skills, even though they're newbie, (Done to protect insecure nature of Little Mosue)




Smokerface is using '********', and I am using |||||||; other members use similar or different symbols; are they all alts?


Smokerface here mean that the "person who checked their addresses" must have wasted/spent, certain minutes checking the addresses, and their transactions (Where does it mention blockchain?), even they did ask the question, then I must have had learned the blockchain info by now, and surely didn't repeat with this account.

---

It's clearly, Mentioned "Did Not pay the winner" but rewarded the alt account of the casino "Spiroll" prize amount, even though the alt didn't win. | You don't need rocket science brain to understand the stunt you pulled @Royse.


No, this also has nothing to do with blockchain questioning, and where was a question about blockchain? Spiroll contest was rigged intentionally, and you can stop mixing blockchaining with your scams.



I don't know what 'dots' you're referring to here by this user, these are terms you use to highlight certain words, and research on already done investigation, what's the connection?


Am I trolling like Smokerface, or have I ever?



What applied to Small Rabbit, can also be applied to Royse.

Any proof for these claims? Otherwise I'll just assume this isn't true.



Humor: The Amount Royse mentioned is $50K, Twice what Small Rabbit scammed $25k.

---

Side Facts (Might come handy further investigators):

It was mentioned before, but here we go again, Royse know about what goes in Small Rabbit's country, he's familiar with the place, but the Royse's original owner is not from Asian country, he was from Russia. (Anything to say here @Royse?)

1. Royse got the address of Small Rabbit (Scammer): Yes, theymos had only the IP address of Small Rabbit, but Royse had the "Address".



This person (Rosey) is good at giving moral advice (To small Rabbit) but does not apply themselves. (Hyptorcrit)



2. Learn Bitcoin got the address of Little Mouse


LoyceV quoted this message of Small Rabbit

Small Rabbit clearly mentioned he has another account in his boasting tone. Apart from Yahoo, Hhampuz, icopress, me, there were a few others which included Royse and his friend Little Mouse

These 2 Users, who have beefed with my investments, also tagged me, and yes, they both have the "Address" of mammal users.
Learn Bitcoin -> Had Little Mouse's address.
Royse -> Had Small Rabbit's address.

I don't know why people here would turn a blind eye to this, but surely there's a single user, or a group from same region is manipulating the majority, they have gotten a lot of experience with what they do, so yes they will most likely not repeat these mistakes they've done here, but I've mentioned here, any can verify them, and come to their own conclusions.