Of course I red your post before leaving the negative trust, but:
1) You offered no proof regarding you really being jacee, you asked for a no-collateral loan from a newbie account.
2) Even if you really are jacee you
do not have trust/feedback at all.
As stated
here you'll most probably get negative trust if you ask for a loan without collateral without a massive amount of trust:
If you completely ignore this sticky and make a loan request with no collateral, without having massive trust on the forum, the chances of you getting negative trusted feedback and therefore having a Trade with Extreme Caution tag is almost 100%.
Finally the fact you ask for a loan on bitlendingclub or any other external site and post the link here doesn't mean you no longer have to fulfill bitcointalk's rules. You
are asking for a loan here. This was discussed before here among other threads:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-plain-links-to-external-lending-sites-allowed-in-the-lending-section-1009469
op, i just like you when i was a newbie, and then, i am almost screwed.
giving this kind of negative trust makes no sense to figure out if he is a scammer, unless he/she is exposed to be an scamming alt, otherwise this kind of act is just harming newbies.
lending is not a place of pawnbroking, but under the "rule", it is just a pawnbroker to protect lenders, not loaners.
Without this rule the lending board would be even more full of scammers. Only very few newbies are really scammers, but unfortunately older members create new accounts just with the purpose of scamming. If they don't get negative trust then real newbies would grant more loans and would be scammed. I agree it sucks that there's no way to distinguish real scammers from honest people who need help. When I leave a negative feedback (for this reason of any other) I keep checking the account and remove it or change it to neutral if required after a few weeks or months.