Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2457. (Read 2761632 times)

sr. member
Activity: 491
Merit: 250
S P 8 D E
i need to know how it mine coin

this morning i have 217 nxt and now i have nothing and there is a transaction that i didn't do that send all my coin to an account
i don't know how this happen

you had an easy password?


guys whats with the LOGO? the logo we have now is not the best..
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
i need to know how it mine coin

this morning i have 217 nxt and now i have nothing and there is a transaction that i didn't do that send all my coin to an account
i don't know how this happen
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
Isn't peer-coin our main competitor since they're PoS too?
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
I want Feather, World, Mega and especially Lite DEAD!
YOU HEAR ME? DEAD!!!

 Tongue Kiss
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
Nxt is No 10 @coinmarketcap!!   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
I got an interesting PM just a minute ago:

"
Hi Klee,

Im looking for a good cryptocurrency to invest money in.
I was enthousiastic about NXT since it's the newest coin on the market.
However, when I did some research on it I discovered the following things:

The currency website www.nextcoin.org and NXT echange platform DGEX.com are both hosted by the same company that appears have produced the currency.
That's Graviton Capital Inc.
By checking the WHOIS info on these websites the admin of both is [email protected]

By googling that emailadress I discovered other websites that are adminned by this guy:

http://www.webboar.com/whois-email/[email protected]

These are domainnames of gambling websites that look like scams.
The one that caught my eye the most is: www.ponzigame.com
PONZI GAME...

Above all that: in the terms of DGEX.com NXT exchange website it says that all BTC tranfered in to your DGEX account will become property of DGEX.com

Well aren't these all serious red flags not to get involved with this currency?
I'd look to know what your opinion is on my foundings.
I haven't been able to post directly on the forum since I'm only a newbie here.
If you also see this as an unfolding scam please warn everybody that is interested.

Kind regards,
xxx
"

I had to disclose it for transparency.
Regardless of the DGEX part, still I can't see how Next or BCNext could be linked with this.
Anyways, I think the accusations for Graviton even if legit have nothing to do with the coin..


Why worry about privacy, he posted a thread...
Really? Link please?
Thing is www.nextcoin.org and www.dgex.com are not affilated with the creation of nxt coin. Nxt will have its own dedicated exchange at time of release in january and btcnxt was happy to just have this forum as a page for nxt.
but that doesnt mean nextcoin.org and dgex.com are legit. but i have used the exchange myself with no issues.

Well, when it comes to domain names, I own NextCoin.com, anyone want to develop as a general site for more info on NxtCoin?  PM me.


and I own nextcoin.de which is already redirected to the German thread on the nextcoin.org forum.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
[2013-12-04 20:09:40.170] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:41.169] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:42.174] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:43.195] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:44.240] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.295] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.327] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:46.239] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:47.258] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:48.247] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:49.244] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:10:17.326] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException

Thx. Keep reporting such exceptions each new version. They r caused by incorrectly responding peers.

I already have seen evidence someone trying to hack Nxt. Are these responses intentionally modified?...
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
[2013-12-04 20:09:40.170] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:41.169] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:42.174] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:43.195] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:44.240] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.295] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.327] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:46.239] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:47.258] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:48.247] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:49.244] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:10:17.326] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException
I'm getting them as well. Just ignore.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
[2013-12-04 20:09:40.170] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:41.169] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:42.174] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:43.195] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:44.240] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.295] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:45.327] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:46.239] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:47.258] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:48.247] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:09:49.244] 33: java.lang.NullPointerException
[2013-12-04 20:10:17.326] 31: java.lang.NullPointerException
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
I'll add a special option to web.xml to disable web interface.
Thanks. Speaking of web.xml, does it do anything for the 'well knowness' of our client to hard code our external IP?

It's for servlet settings as well. Will get more usage in 0.3.10.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Come-from-beyond for clarification:

Port 7874 is used for P2P and http web client.
Port 7875 is used for https web client.
Port 7876 is used for API commands.

Is this accurate?

Yes, for 0.3.9. Next version will have only 7874 and 7875. I'll post more details when publish it.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I'll add a special option to web.xml to disable web interface.
Thanks. Speaking of web.xml, does it do anything for the 'well knowness' of our client to hard code our external IP?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
So the API cannot be used remotely?

It can. Looks like I became the 2nd core dev, so I'm going to add options to restrict interface and API to a list of IPs.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
Come-from-beyond for clarification:

Port 7874 is used for P2P and http web client.
Port 7875 is used for https web client.
Port 7876 is used for API commands.

Is this correct?
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 505
The Last NXT Founder
So, the web interface is at 7874 now for some reason...
hero member
Activity: 566
Merit: 500
So the API cannot be used remotely?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
Is the P2P port still 7874?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Version 0.3.8 - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/67242472/nxt.zip

Rewritten web interface networking.

Now HTTP & HTTPS can be used (http://localhost:7874 & https://localhost:7875). The latter is preferable if u use "online" wallet. Browsers will show warning coz TLS certificate is self-signed, try to add it into the certificate vault to get rid of the warning.
Which port needs to be open to allow peer connections while behind a firewall, still 7874? Now that the web interface is at 7874, is there a way to block outside users from unlocking their accounts on a node that I run (because it is not secure and I don't want to encourage it), without breaking p2p connectivity?


I'll add a special option to web.xml to disable web interface.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Which port needs to be open to allow peer connections while behind a firewall, still 7874? Now that the web interface is at 7874, is there a way to block outside users from unlocking their accounts on a node that I run (because it is not secure and I don't want to encourage it), without breaking p2p connectivity?
Good point, I had 7874 open for P2P.
Jump to: