No, the reason is simple: if it wasn't Hitler, it would've been someone who shared the beliefs of Hitler, which were plentiful enough to make that whole fiasco happen. Only thing that separated Hitler from the others is that he was the most charismatic, plenty of charismatic men were also present who could've fulfilled the same functions of representing the general will of the nation. That so many people said yes indicates a general willingness to "do what it takes", without knowing what "it" actually is. Sure, beating yourself over the head with a hammer is a hard thing to do, but would you do it if it meant having a million dollars? It's a trick question, the real question is, does self-infliction help that cause?
Yep, the outcome could be even worse.
Case in point; just over a decade ago serial-lying psychopaths on both sides of the Atlantic decided that getting rid of Saddam Hussein
(the New Hitler, remember?) would be a great thing. Since that resulted in total catastrophe and chaos in the area; four years ago another batch of nutcases decided to do the same thing in Lybia. Who knows; maybe in a year morons and voting machines will have landed someone in the White House crazy enough to attack those who
CAN defend themselves and bite back, like Russia and China (there´s also a New Hitler there according to those mental cases).
