I think that the bubble is not over yet, it has just started !!!
you are referring to the $ bubble, aren´t you?
Bond bubble ends, $ bubble begins.
Topic: Obama says the US will attack Syria, Bitcoin value rises to new heights (Read 6065 times)
September 07, 2013, 12:47:55 AM
you are referring to the $ bubble, aren´t you?
Bond bubble ends, $ bubble begins.
September 06, 2013, 01:49:37 AM
I think that the bubble is not over yet, it has just started !!!
you are referring to the $ bubble, aren´t you?
September 06, 2013, 01:42:14 AM
What do you think Russia will do? Could it create uncertainty for BTC?
September 04, 2013, 03:07:58 PM
1,500 casualties isn't an incredibly large amount in the grand scheme of things.
This is collectivism, the value of human beings reduzed to zero. No retirement for you, it is directly to the soilent green factory at 45.
September 04, 2013, 02:37:03 PM
The hypocrisy is enough to make you lose consciousness before you can take it all in.
Who are overwhelming the biggest manufacturers and merchants of chemical munitions and systems? USA weapons manufacturers.
Who are overwhelming the biggest users of chemical (and nuclear tipped) munitions in conflicts over the last 60 years? USA armed forces.
Where were the calls to declare attacks on the USA from all those governments that are singing the chorus now for attacking Syria? I could go on, but I fear the passing out from indignation thing will get to me before I'm done
Who are overwhelming the biggest manufacturers and merchants of chemical munitions and systems? USA weapons manufacturers.
Who are overwhelming the biggest users of chemical (and nuclear tipped) munitions in conflicts over the last 60 years? USA armed forces.
Where were the calls to declare attacks on the USA from all those governments that are singing the chorus now for attacking Syria? I could go on, but I fear the passing out from indignation thing will get to me before I'm done
September 04, 2013, 02:28:27 PM
Not entirely sure those two things are related.
Me either. The majority of Americans are against any interference and Obama has said no "boots on ground." Obviously this could change but for right now I see the "attack" as nothing more than a couple of cruise missiles launched their way to tell them to knock it off. 1,500 casualties isn't an incredibly large amount in the grand scheme of things.
Unless your father is one of the 1500. Then you dedicate your life to fighting the USA. This is how "terrorists" are created. And calling it no big deal is what keeps them from forgiving and moving on.
September 04, 2013, 12:32:08 PM
interesting development regarding the congress now.. what do you think will happen if they say no?
I don't think it will be a no. The blackmail-bribe-athon is likely to be hard at work ATM. More interesting to see how the Obama administration thinks it will avoid condemnation by the UNSC, and the rest of the UN members.
Didn't they do the whole thing of ignoring the UNSC in Iraq part II because of the terrorist threat represented by Iraq? Now it seems that people have just forgotten that mitigation, USA goes to war on flimsy evidence that is almost entirely an emotional argument.
Interesting also that while Russia has been vocal about it all, China has been very quiet. I've heard no attempt to explain this disparity from any commentator of any of the various factions in this conflagration.
September 04, 2013, 07:05:09 AM
interesting development regarding the congress now.. what do you think will happen if they say no?
September 03, 2013, 10:41:25 AM
Imagine all those middle class or wealthy Syrians looking to relocate some of their wealth to avoid death and property destruction.
And how exactly are they going to be buying Bitcoins (quickly) to transfer out?
I know there's an Iranian exchange that recently popped up. Not sure how quickly they can access that but people usually take precautionary steps. They don't actually wait for the slaughter to get to their front door before acting.
Regarding previous point a recent example is Gadhafi paying his mercenaries in gold during Lybian war. Gold key to financing Gaddafi struggle - FT.com http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/588ce75a-53e4-11e0-8bd7-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F588ce75a-53e4-11e0-8bd7-00144feab49a.html%3Fsiteedition%3Dintl&siteedition=intl&_i_referer=
Theoretically USD could also be an option but it's better to store and move gold for such occasions than USD. Gold is more reliable than any fiat currency. This was proven historically many times over.
September 03, 2013, 10:32:22 AM
Imagine all those middle class or wealthy Syrians looking to relocate some of their wealth to avoid death and property destruction.
And how exactly are they going to be buying Bitcoins (quickly) to transfer out?
September 03, 2013, 10:31:03 AM
In dire times of war national currencies are no longer accepted by trading partners due to default risk, huge inflation and so on. This is what happened in WW2 and also in recent times.
What are the 'recent times' when the USD stopped being accepted by trading partners?
I wasn't talking about USD.
You said "Gold becomes the only valid currency", implying surely that all national currencies were no longer accepted?
If not, then the USD would continue to be the standard reserve currency, and other countries would use that when trading.
September 03, 2013, 10:27:45 AM
In dire times of war national currencies are no longer accepted by trading partners due to default risk, huge inflation and so on. This is what happened in WW2 and also in recent times.
What are the 'recent times' when the USD stopped being accepted by trading partners?
I wasn't talking about USD.
September 03, 2013, 10:26:11 AM
In dire times of war national currencies are no longer accepted by trading partners due to default risk, huge inflation and so on. This is what happened in WW2 and also in recent times.
What are the 'recent times' when the USD stopped being accepted by trading partners?
September 03, 2013, 10:17:00 AM
In dire times of war national currencies are no longer accepted by trading partners due to default risk, huge inflation and so on. This is what happened in WW2 and also in recent times. Gold becomes the only valid currency but since Bitcoin is much easier to move around than gold....it really is gold 2.0. It's very easy to cross the border with it unlike with gold or cash as you don't risk what happened to these poor folks http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/report-authorities-seize-50-million-in-gold-from-private-owner-nearly-a-ton-video_04062013.
It also beats diamonds.
http://www.bobsguide.com/guide/news/2008/Jun/20/ubs-banker-smuggled-diamonds-in-a-toothpaste-tube.html
Imagine all those middle class or wealthy Syrians looking to relocate some of their wealth to avoid death and property destruction.
It also beats diamonds.
http://www.bobsguide.com/guide/news/2008/Jun/20/ubs-banker-smuggled-diamonds-in-a-toothpaste-tube.htmlImagine all those middle class or wealthy Syrians looking to relocate some of their wealth to avoid death and property destruction.
September 03, 2013, 09:30:31 AM
Well people have been taking money out of emerging markets due to the human variable. They get scared and pull out everything causing those investments to fail. furthermore, Bitcoin has been getting emence amounts of press lately. this means that people are taking money out of other places, and they might come across an article related to bitcoins, and choose to invest there. being a decentralized currency, it's value always goes up and people see it as a star investment. then people invest money and the value of the item goes up further, making even more people want to invest in it. since there are no outside factors, and people understand that their is no logical reason for the bitcoin to fall, as it's not based on the success of anything else, it will always succeed. Making the threat on Syria a valid reason for the bitcoin to increase in value.
September 03, 2013, 07:53:29 AM
even if it did rise seemingly at the same time id say, it was due to the underlying dynamic fundamentals
September 03, 2013, 05:27:31 AM
the more aggressively the US pursues this madness, the more we can expect indirect hostility to US dominance in all spheres (currency and financial domination being only one area)
mmmmm another interesting point of view
September 02, 2013, 05:10:17 PM
[...]
It's about sharing...
It's about sharing...
Wondered about this for some time: I hope it is sharing as in gifts or gifts voluntary aid organizations, not taking from some by force and diverting to random strangers, in order to create group hate, in order to secure the power of the elites.
September 02, 2013, 04:56:14 PM
Congress will vote Obama down, just like most of the world will.
Saudi Arabia wants a pipeline through Syria. Obama and them ain't getting it.
I don't want blood money on BTC.
It's about sharing...
Saudi Arabia wants a pipeline through Syria. Obama and them ain't getting it.
I don't want blood money on BTC.
It's about sharing...
September 02, 2013, 04:55:12 PM
its amazing what people can read from situations. as stated by many others I think its pretty safe to say that these have absolutely nothing to do with each other 
September 02, 2013, 04:49:01 PM
The Arabic countries should sell the oil only for bitcoins instead of USD as protest.
The Arab League just came out and said military force is not an option, a pretty big blow to Obama.
Unanimously? Such a statement would be a massive repudiation of US meddling, by many that ordinarily comply happily. It's hard to see how it could be spun into further belligerence, aside from declaring war on the entire Middle East (Obama: "Wrong answer!"
The arab league, a bunch of dictators?
Two words: Don't attack.
One man's dictator is another's defender of the faith. What I mean is that it's remarkable that such a mix of differently aligned rulers could possibly endorse such a statement, it would be a real diversion from any expected course. I do not condone what is reported of many of these rulers, but the fog of war is extra thick, it's a little arrogant to presume which of these regimes are "goodies" or "baddies" on the basis of the information we can obtain about them. Picture is sketchy. Rumours of reliable US lapdogs performing about-turns are swashing around the undercurrents right now.
September 02, 2013, 04:34:51 PM
The Arabic countries should sell the oil only for bitcoins instead of USD as protest.
The Arab League just came out and said military force is not an option, a pretty big blow to Obama.
Unanimously? Such a statement would be a massive repudiation of US meddling, by many that ordinarily comply happily. It's hard to see how it could be spun into further belligerence, aside from declaring war on the entire Middle East (Obama: "Wrong answer!"
The arab league, a bunch of dictators?
Two words: Don't attack.
September 02, 2013, 04:23:53 PM
The Arabic countries should sell the oil only for bitcoins instead of USD as protest.
The Arab League just came out and said military force is not an option, a pretty big blow to Obama.
Unanimously? Such a statement would be a massive repudiation of US meddling, by many that ordinarily comply happily. It's hard to see how it could be spun into further belligerence, aside from declaring war on the entire Middle East (Obama: "Wrong answer!"
September 02, 2013, 03:50:29 PM
The Arabic countries should sell the oil only for bitcoins instead of USD as protest.
The Arab League just came out and said military force is not an option, a pretty big blow to Obama.
September 02, 2013, 01:20:29 PM
how are the 2 related?
September 02, 2013, 01:18:22 PM
Obama wanted to bring democracy and freedom to Iraq, couple years later 1,500 barrels of oil are being exported daily, Iraq now has freedom and democracy, time to bring freedom and democracy to Syria.
i vote we bring freedom and democracy to the united states.
I love this rhetoric: why vote for a human that promises policies when you could just vote for the policy instead of the human? I don't want a lump of flesh to represent my interests, I want my actual interests to be put to the vote. If no-one else votes with me, I'll move to where they do. That system would be genuine free democracy, as in, the way the word directly translates from the Greek language it comes from.
September 02, 2013, 11:02:29 AM
Obama wanted to bring democracy and freedom to Iraq, couple years later 1,500 barrels of oil are being exported daily, Iraq now has freedom and democracy, time to bring freedom and democracy to Syria.
i vote we bring freedom and democracy to the united states.
September 02, 2013, 08:38:46 AM
obama baffles me every fucking day, sometimes i wonder why the idiots in America voted for him.
The Republican alternative seemed batshit crazier, IMO.
Right; people think, "Well, if I have two options, Stalin or Hitler, I'd better go with the lesser of two evils."
In my humble opinion, no one's better than Obama, which is why I voted for no one.
Related to the thread: my money's on these two happenings not being related to each other.
September 02, 2013, 02:39:50 AM
Why would vaporware affect the price of BTC?
Vaporware exists in the first place because dumb people are willing to pay for it. And this time you can only pay with btc.
September 02, 2013, 02:04:31 AM
What do you think will happen regarding Syria?
September 01, 2013, 10:19:53 PM
obama baffles me every fucking day, sometimes i wonder why the idiots in America voted for him.
The Republican alternative seemed batshit crazier, IMO.
well, i guess we had no choice. Mitten's seemed like a loony anyway if we voted for him.
September 01, 2013, 08:54:19 PM
Why would vaporware affect the price of BTC?
September 01, 2013, 08:52:46 PM
BTC rising is more likely due to the august 26th BFL announcement of the 600gh/s mining card; which does not accept CC/PP as payment, as per usual during phase1 of their products
September 01, 2013, 01:05:40 PM
It funny how bitcoin behaving more like gold than even gold!
September 01, 2013, 01:04:41 PM
Buy on the rumor. Sell on the news.
September 01, 2013, 12:59:29 PM
There isn't the slightest piece of evidence of any relation between BTC and what's going on in Syria.
Has there been a rise of BTC software downloads from Syria?
Most BTC investors are very far from Syria, and they may care about what's going on there, but I fail to understand how this could make them invest more, or bring more people investing.
Has there been a rise of BTC software downloads from Syria?
Most BTC investors are very far from Syria, and they may care about what's going on there, but I fail to understand how this could make them invest more, or bring more people investing.
September 01, 2013, 12:10:48 PM
obama baffles me every fucking day, sometimes i wonder why the idiots in America voted for him.
The Republican alternative seemed batshit crazier, IMO.
September 01, 2013, 11:53:10 AM
FTFY
Honest mistake, they're all the same sock-puppets to me, opening their filthy mouth to tell lies and infect our minds. Every second word coming out of their mouth is propaganda.
September 01, 2013, 10:57:30 AM
FTFY
September 01, 2013, 09:45:59 AM
Obama wanted to bring democracy and freedom to Iraq, couple years later 1,500 barrels of oil are being exported daily, Iraq now has freedom and democracy, time to bring freedom and democracy to Syria.
September 01, 2013, 02:33:33 AM
The Arabic countries should sell the oil only for bitcoins instead of USD as protest.
August 31, 2013, 10:19:22 PM
current jump in exchange rates is related to past week's US regulators meet up with the Foundation. i think some folks in DC got excited along with some speculators and maybe even attracted those who were still on a fence about getting into bitcoin before.
exciting, more details?
August 31, 2013, 10:12:50 PM
current jump in exchange rates is related to past week's US regulators meet up with the Foundation. i think some folks in DC got excited along with some speculators and maybe even attracted those who were still on a fence about getting into bitcoin before.
August 31, 2013, 09:47:51 PM
I don't think the Syria affair will affect bitcoin price much.
August 31, 2013, 08:54:16 PM
"Correlation does not imply causation"
Sometimes it does.
August 31, 2013, 08:16:00 PM
Gotta love Obama!
August 31, 2013, 07:53:59 PM
obama baffles me every fucking day, sometimes i wonder why the idiots in America voted for him.
August 31, 2013, 07:05:28 PM
How are these heights new? Until Bitcoin exceeds it's record we're not at new heights
August 31, 2013, 07:04:29 PM
Now Obama wants approval from Congress before taking military action. How likely is he to get it?
President Obama turns to Congress to OK strike against Syria
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/31/president-obama-says-us-must-act-on-syria/
President Obama turns to Congress to OK strike against Syria
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/31/president-obama-says-us-must-act-on-syria/
August 31, 2013, 06:56:02 PM
"Correlation does not imply causation"
August 31, 2013, 05:49:48 PM
excact..!
August 31, 2013, 04:03:00 PM
The two events are probably not, but also may be, related.
Well, that's got the possibilities covered!
Anything the Russians and Chinese states can do to drive Bitcoin adoption is in their interest when the US behaves increasingly belligerently, a hot war is not sensible. They've only been doing this already for a while now, after all, just not too flagrantly. But the more aggressively the US pursues this madness, the more we can expect indirect hostility to US dominance in all spheres (currency and financial domination being only one area)
August 31, 2013, 02:22:10 PM
It'll also be interesting to see what effect this will have on precious metals too.
yeah, but precious metals are heavily manipulated
August 31, 2013, 02:19:12 PM
I think that the bubble is not over yet, it has just started !!!
August 31, 2013, 01:53:27 PM
Not entirely sure those two things are related.
Me either. The majority of Americans are against any interference and Obama has said no "boots on ground." Obviously this could change but for right now I see the "attack" as nothing more than a couple of cruise missiles launched their way to tell them to knock it off. 1,500 casualties isn't an incredibly large amount in the grand scheme of things.
August 31, 2013, 01:34:10 PM
Not entirely sure those two things are related.
August 31, 2013, 01:25:10 PM
It'll also be interesting to see what effect this will have on precious metals too. However, Obama and co have been getting lots of backlash as many members of the House and Senate plus super majorities of the American people don't want this to happen.
August 31, 2013, 01:10:34 PM
The two events are probably not, but also may be, related.
Jump to: