Is bch a bubble?
If bch is a bubble, has that bubble popped?
[img]
For reference, it was not long ago that ethereum was considered a good investment with a massive spike eerily similar to what bch is indicating now.
[img]
Do the people behind bch and eth seem like individuals whose goal is to create long term value and wealth. Or do they seem more like the types to focus on short term gains to the expense of long term value? I think Satoshi was a creator of longer term value, which is why bitcoin has done as well as it has. As for Roger Ver and whoever is running ethereum now, I would be interested to know what public opinion on them is.
On a more technical side, should bitcoin cash be worth 1/4th of what it is given it has very limited utility. It isn't supported by retailers. It doesn't many have uses or real world application. There's not much good about bitcoin cash to favor it. There is a chance that bitcoin cash's real world value is $400. Whatever value it appears to have may be an illusion.It's far too soon to be calling a burst bubble on BCH. We're barely 12 hours away from its all time high, and people want to call the bubble finished. What is certain at this point is that BCH is extremely volatile, and that it has seen a massive influx of capital at the same time that BTC has seen a massive outflow of capital. This is likely not a coincidence. Any pullback from a high is not a burst bubble. Far more time needs to elapse before any conclusion can be drawn, there's just not enough data yet.
In response to the bolded text, this is mostly inaccurate. BCH has no less utility than BTC. It is easy for merchants who take BTC to switch to BCH, the fact that they haven't (yet) is not an indication that they won't, especially so young in BCH's life cycle. This would be the equivalent of people claiming 3 months after bitcoin was released that nobody uses it to buy anything, so it's never going to amount to anything. Obviously, that was shortsighted and wrong. Not only is the reasoning wrong, but there's an increasing case to be made that BCH will be more useful than BTC. With SegWit2x called off, there is no proposal on the table to scale BTC and there likely won't be for some time. BCH was created to create the capacity that BTC was neglecting, and add to that that BTC is currently being crushed by a massive spam attack, and BCH looks even better. I believe the spam attack is meant to cripple the network and drive more people to BCH, and although that's shady as hell, the point remains that BTC can't handle the traffic, and a protocol that is prone to manipulation like that is not useful or secure.
I've been against BCH since the fork that created it, but I also just want the tech to work, and BTC is currently failing in that regard compared to BCH. I'm not ready to switch the horse I'm rooting for yet, but at the end of the day, I'm not sticking with BTC just to stick with BTC because
the tech has to work!