The only reason I could see for Bitcointalk to create an NFT collection is to fund a certain movement/charity. Yea I'm pretty sure most people here aren't fans of NFTs, but if the goal was to raise funds for a good cause, it can get the job done.
I think NFTs are absolutely, utterly stupid. Having said that, I agree with you about buying one if the funds were to go to charity (although I'm currently wearing Foxpup's sexy avatar at the moment and won't change until the Fox god gives the say-so).
But that brings up another problem, which is the general issue of charity funds being used appropriately. If, for instance, Foxpup were to create a series of NFT avatars for his cycling club and I were to buy one for charitable purposes, I'd want the funds to be used ASAP and not held in some pool for an indefinite length of time.
It's actually not a bad idea, just fraught with problems. I'd be willing to chip in if something like that were managed right.
Another problem is the token's price. It can not be set to a fixed value so it is bound to get dumped hard basically making the tokens worthless whereas received bitcoin, despite being volatile, is not going to become worthless.
Would anyone want to own a heavily-used avatar from a Foxpup Cycling Club member at some point down the road? Just wondering. If I bought one, I doubt I'd try to put it on the market--assuming NFT markets still exist a year or two from now, which I seriously question. If they're still being bought and sold, I betcha people aren't going to be paying crazy amounts of money like they are today.
