Experiment Diary10.01.2024
2 days have passed since the first request to restore the wallet was sent.
There were no messages from support.
I know someone that recently (~ 1 year) has lost access to the e-mail associated with their blockchain.info wallet created about 5-6 years ago. They only had their wallet ID and the password but since they were logging in from a new IP, a confirmation e-mail was always sent to that specific (and lost) e-mail. After some back and forth conversation with the support team he gave up on reclaiming the amount mainly due to the amount of information that the it was being asked. Here's the full detail of the requested information:
(...) we require you to please provide a high-resolution selfie holding the ID document used during sign-up and a paper with a handwritten text which should include:
- Changes to be applied to your profile
- Blockchain.info username + e-mail address
- Full name, address and date of birth
- BTC current price
- Current date
If this behaviour still continues (which I suspect it does) be prepared to provide some (if not all) of the information reported before if you want to access your wallet.
Of course, I am not going to participate in such a humiliating farce if, as a result of the experiment, I am required to undergo enhanced KYC. If nothing works out in the anonymity mode of wallet recovery, then, naturally, my attitude towards Blockchain.com will change to a sharply negative one. And this will obviously be partly bad advertising for them.
Experiment Diary08.01.2024
Start.
10.01.2024
2 days have passed since the first request to restore the wallet was sent.
There were no messages from support.
11.01.2024
I received the following response from support:
"...
Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately, I am not able to find an account with the email address you used to contact us with. May I kindly ask if you could confirm your full name and email address you used to create your Blockchain.com account?
..."
My answer :
" .... email address to which my wallet was registered on .. /.. /201.. in Blockchain.info: ....@.... . I have lost access to this mailbox. Can you change the specified email to a work address: .....@.....?
To confirm ownership of the wallet, I report the following: I made.... transactions at the specified address: 0jddft.....9a71f0ed, 7a763..... b5c93ea6,..... .
Now I need to restore access to the specified wallet and conduct a signal transaction confirming ownership of this account. Thank you."
12.01.2024
In response to my appeal yesterday, I received a standard and, it should be noted, idiotic and arrogant response, including such a “crazy” recommendation:
" Thanks for reaching out.
~~~~~
If you do not have your 12 Word (this is despite the fact that I wrote everywhere that I have a mnemonic phrase of 17 words.
) recovery phrase, our best current solution is to change the email address associated with your wallet.
In order to process this update on your profile, for security reasons we require you to please provide a high-resolution selfie holding the ID document used during verification and a paper with a handwritten text which must include:
Today's date
Today's bitcoin price
Your full name, address and date of birth
Your wallet identifier, current email address, 2FA type, creation date, and SMS number (if any).
Your new email address
Once we have this information, we will be able to update the email on your Blockchain.com Wallet.
Thanks,"
They must have gone completely nuts
My answer :
"The wallet I specified in Blockchain.info was created solely by confirming the reply link from my email address on ..../.../ 201... in Blockchain.info, of which Blockchain.com is currently the legal successor (the specified address was given by me in the previous letter). In 201..., no additional KYC requirements were imposed on me (and other clients of your service) other than confirmation of this email address by Blockchain.info. Currently, I have saved all the information necessary to restore access to the wallet in your service. The information consists of a mnemonic phrase of 17 words (and not 12 words, as you write for some reason!). This phrase was used by your service in 201.... I know the address of my Legacy P2PKH wallet in mainnet btc, created using your service
~~~
I believe your demands for providing such KYC specifically, in this form, and in my case (just replacing the email address!) are not just formal and overly exaggerated, but also simply insulting towards me. I again suggest that you fulfill your guarantee of access to my wallet as part of your public obligations on your part that arose after my use of your service. And stop requesting personal data that is unnecessary in this case, which is personal information of a confidential nature and, accordingly, has legally regulated limited access. I suggest you resolve this issue by simply changing your email address to a new one, taking into account all the data I previously provided and inform me about your decision.
13.01.2024
Reply received:
"Thank you for reaching out!
I understand your point, however, this is the only way we can proceed with request of changing the email address since you could not longer access the verified email address registered to your account. I have no intentions in any way to make you feel uncomfortable. However, please understand as well that this is one of our protocols and we cannot proceed without the requested information.""
The experiment failed.
It became clear to me how anti-user friendly Blockchain.com is towards its clients.
All that remains is to wish them to go bankrupt quickly and get away from the arena where real cryptocurrency lovers play.
By the way, I wonder how many tens of thousands of accounts of early adopters of
BTC they froze based on the loss of email and the user’s refusal to complete KYC in such an evil form as they wrote in their damn “protocol”? And these people lost their
BTC forever. Such actions can probably be regarded as theft. Do you think I'm right?