Topic: On the situation around the transition to GEOS and the possible fork of the medi (Read 65 times)

Questions for CyberFund, FUNDERS, SEO, golos.core and golos.io commands
 

Earth life passed to half
I found myself in a gloomy forest ...
 
I'm wandering around the stumps, along the ashes,
all that remains of the home.
 
Dante Alighieri
 

What happens?
What's happening? If it's short - it's not known to anyone. We see and can only comment on the results, without discussion and the opportunity to take an active part, somehow to influence what is happening. Investors, users (the same bloggers and journalists, for the sake of which the platform was created) were invested and invested by their means, efforts and time in some kind of "black box".

The situation is strange and confusing. Obviously, this is abnormal and so it should not be. Let's discuss, talk about it. Otherwise ... memento mori (instantly at sea) - "remember that it is mortal."

The main declared principle of the site is decentralization, i.e. the ability of each token holder to directly influence decision making, albeit in proportion to the steak or other parameter. In fact, there is a clear vertical of power in the traditions of eastern tyranny, when authoritarian leadership has all communications with the plebs "before the light bulb", and the institution of delegates is stalled. In this regard, I would like more democracy in such areas:

1. To conduct official meetings of the founders, investors, delegates and community at least twice a month. Regularly review the priorities for the media player's Voice tasks, and the decisions made, recognized as important and urgent, implemented immediately. This can be a withdrawal / appointment to a post, initiation of important changes, issues of distribution / financing, etc.

2. Preliminary discussion of cardinal changes in the strategy of media block development GOLOS. For example, the transition to GEOS, the abandonment of these plans or separation.

3. Open accountability for the use of funds in BTC collected on a token / ICO.

4. Payment of the work of golos.core and vorkers with tokens from the new issue of GOLOS.

5.To clarify the status of technical accounts (origin, purpose of accumulation, plans for further use). Minimize or completely eliminate their influence on the processes of commercial activity, supervision, voting for delegates.

6. The economy of a media block is not equal to the monetization of CyberFund. It seems that the founders and key creatures in executive positions do not have a distinct economic strategy or understanding of the processes of the Voice economy.

Which one makes it right?
Each voiced point requires a separate wider discussion and consideration. That's just where and with whom to lead a similar discussion? This requires good will and the desire of the parties to make contact.

What do we see in reality? Let's say that the builders do not have to personally study the project's problems in detail, for this they hire a team, officials to key directions and delegate their powers to them. But powers are always delegated along with responsibility.

Management can be represented as a set of four functions and two processes. This is planning, organization of activities, motivation and control. And management is realized through information exchange and management decisions.

It's in theory. What is happening here?

The Voice Community does not participate in the planning, is not involved in the organizational structure (with the exception of delegates), has no motivation to increase its share in the project (voice power) and does not control what is happening. Community, i.e. a group of people with common interests, thanks to whom we all gathered here, participate in the information exchange with the team episodically, situationally. More often than not, it is the reaction of indignation and indignation to the next failure of the administration or the "breaking of the bottom" by the exchange of tokens. Since communications (information channels) are not functioning and not supported, questions and initiatives of users are left without consideration and response. And even more so, users do not take part in the process of making managerial decisions.

Project management is unsatisfactory, so it is not surprising that the economy does not work. An effective manager and Big Brother are not the same thing.

Key vacancies: SEO and market-maker.

 

Why can not see new investors?
Perhaps, nobody likes the role of live seafood at Oktoberfest? More recently, @alexna tried on the role of cancer, when around kegs are unloaded, tables are placed, and waitresses, dressed in the style of "dirdl", are already wiping huge beer glasses.

 

"I do not agree - criticize, criticize - offer, offer - do, do - answer!"
Again, the root of evil is in manual control (this is a decentralized platform). Less interference, more freedom and a wild market. Dear CyberFund, are not you tired of users? We are rather tired of each other. It would be great if you made your presence on the project less noticeable.

The basic values ​​provided by the blockbuster have not gone anywhere, they have not been transformed, and in and of themselves lay huge prospects in the project. We have been cooking in this kitchen for a long time, for us they are obvious. But the rest of the world, no matter how trite it sounded, only just opens them for himself. We are still pioneers of this revolutionary breakthrough with large-scale consequences affecting not only the sphere of information exchange, finance, but also the majority of other industries.

Almost all the current problems of development of the media block of the Voice are decided by the adoption of two rules:

1. Voting for delegates in the format of 1 token = 1 vote (tokens are divided between delegates for whom the user voted).

2.Payment of the work of golos.core specialists with tokens from the issue (vorkers).

As for the golos.io team, it would be fair to finance it at the expense of external sources, as a private project.