Author

Topic: Only MATH is the way of Private Key (Read 889 times)

brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
March 10, 2024, 12:57:51 AM
#25
but thats for probably 128 bits? sure it can be that fast but 256 bits, i dont think so. im running your code. been 5 hours in so far.

256 bits cannot be solved with anything. It does not matter what programming language is used.


What if it only used 4 bits?
brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
March 10, 2024, 12:49:47 AM
#24
Math isn't the way of the Private key - per say.

I came up with the idea of a Private/Public Key pair - and shared it with PGP, OpenPGP, and GPG.
I didn't call it a Private/Public Key Pair.  As they do today.
I also shared my idea with the *Bitcoin Software Developer.

I mentioned how I learned that a 256-Character Password - was very secure and extremely hard to brute force.
And, that I had plans to use such.  But, in a very different way.  And, that it had a problem, how to create such,
without scouring the entire system for duplicates.  I came up with a way to do such.  Using the Random Number
Generator, we all likely learned in Basic Programming 101 - But, with added programming, to assure that it wasn't
duplicated, as Random Number Generators tend to repeat 0 when first ran, multiple instances in a row.  

It's been a while - But, I have some ideas that could shine the light on veiwing said Private Keys.






*Bitcoin (edited to include)
member
Activity: 235
Merit: 12
March 05, 2024, 10:50:28 AM
#23
but thats for probably 128 bits? sure it can be that fast but 256 bits, i dont think so. im running your code. been 5 hours in so far.

256 bits cannot be solved with anything. It does not matter what programming language is used.
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 6
Life aint interesting without any cuts and bruises
March 01, 2024, 12:06:57 AM
#22
but thats for probably 128 bits? sure it can be that fast but 256 bits, i dont think so. im running your code. been 5 hours in so far.
member
Activity: 235
Merit: 12
February 25, 2024, 07:54:32 AM
#21
OK i would like to say, till now i get all the puzzles from 1 to 65 faster than let´s say kangaroo, and the code i have, is write in python !!

I would like to put a picture here in, so maybe it explain more, but i don´t know how to do it.

There is no chance to solve faster than kangaroo even if kangaroo is written entirely in python.
I have about 200.000 hops/sec in it (single core), but I optimized it heavily for python with gmpy2.

Puzzle 45

  • Kangaroo: Sun Feb 25 12:48:52 2024
  • P-table prepared
  • tame and wild herds are prepared
  • Hops: 199048 h/s
  • total time: 30.27 sec
  • PUZZLE SOLVED: 19996463086597
  • Hops: 6025182
  • Average time to solve: 30.27 sec


I'm not going to post pictures here, but the script and then you can compare. Wink

Code:
import time
import os
import sys
import random
import secp256k1 as ice
import gmpy2

if os.name == 'nt':
    os.system('cls')
else:
    os.system('clear')
t = time.ctime()
sys.stdout.write(f"\033[?25l")
sys.stdout.write(f"\033[01;33m[+] Kangaroo: {t}\n")
sys.stdout.flush()

modulo = gmpy2.mpz(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFFFC2F)
order = gmpy2.mpz(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364141)
Gx = gmpy2.mpz(0x79BE667EF9DCBBAC55A06295CE870B07029BFCDB2DCE28D959F2815B16F81798)
Gy = gmpy2.mpz(0x483ada7726a3c4655da4fbfc0e1108a8fd17b448a68554199c47d08ffb10d4b8)

# Define Point class
class Point:
    def __init__(self, x=0, y=0):
        self.x = gmpy2.mpz(x)
        self.y = gmpy2.mpz(y)

PG = Point(Gx, Gy)
Z = Point(0, 0)  # zero-point, infinite in real x, y - plane

def add(P, Q, p=modulo):
    if P == Z:
        return Q
    elif Q == Z:
        return P
    elif P.x == Q.x and (P.y != Q.y or P.y == 0):
        return Z
    elif P.x == Q.x:
        m = (3 * P.x * P.x) * gmpy2.invert(2 * P.y, p) % p
    else:
        m = (Q.y - P.y) * gmpy2.invert(Q.x - P.x, p) % p
  
    x = (m * m - P.x - Q.x) % p
    y = (m * (P.x - x) - P.y) % p
    return Point(x, y)

def mul2(P, p=modulo):
    if P == Z:
        return Z
    m = gmpy2.f_mod(3 * P.x * P.x * gmpy2.invert(2 * P.y, p), p)
    x = gmpy2.f_mod(m * m - 2 * P.x, p)
    y = gmpy2.f_mod(m * (P.x - x) - P.y, p)
    return Point(x, y)

def mulk(k, P=PG, p=modulo):
    if k == 0:
        return Z
    elif k == 1:
        return P
    elif k % 2 == 0:
        return mulk(k // 2, mul2(P, p), p)
    else:
        return add(P, mulk((k - 1) // 2, mul2(P, p), p), p)

def X2Y(X, y_parity, p=modulo):
    X_cubed = gmpy2.powmod(X, 3, p)
    X_squared = gmpy2.powmod(X, 2, p)
    tmp = gmpy2.f_mod(X_cubed + 7, p)
    Y = gmpy2.powmod(tmp, gmpy2.f_div(gmpy2.add(p, 1), 4), p)
    if y_parity == 1:
        Y = gmpy2.f_mod(-Y, p)
    return Y


def comparator(A, Ak, B, Bk):
    result = set(A).intersection(set(B))
    if result:
        sol_kt = A.index(next(iter(result)))
        sol_kw = B.index(next(iter(result)))
        HEX = "%064x" % abs(Ak[sol_kt] - Bk[sol_kw])
        dec = int(HEX, 16)
        wifc = ice.btc_pvk_to_wif(HEX)
        wifu = ice.btc_pvk_to_wif(HEX, False)
        caddr = ice.privatekey_to_address(0, True, dec)
        uaddr = ice.privatekey_to_address(0, False, dec)
        total_time = time.time() - starttime
        print('\n[+] total time: %.2f sec' % (total_time))
        t = time.ctime()
        print(f"\033[32m[+] PUZZLE SOLVED: {t} \033[0m")
        print(f"\033[32m[+] Private key (wif) Compressed : {wifc} \033[0m")
        with open("KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt", "a") as file:
            file.write("\n\nSOLVED " + t)
            file.write(f"\nTotal Time: {total_time:.2f} sec")
            file.write(f"\nRandom seed: {seed}")
            file.write("\nPrivate Key (decimal): " + str(dec))
            file.write("\nPrivate Key (hex): " + HEX)
            file.write("\nPrivate key (wif) Compressed : " + wifc)
            file.write("\nPrivate key (wif) Uncompressed: " + wifu)
            file.write("\nBitcoin address Compressed: " + caddr)
            file.write("\nBitcoin address Uncompressed: " + uaddr)
            file.write(
                "\n-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"
            )
        file.close()
        return True
    else:
        return False

def check(P, Pindex, DP_rarity, A, Ak, B, Bk):
    if P.x % DP_rarity == 0:
        A.append(gmpy2.mpz(P.x))
        Ak.append(gmpy2.mpz(Pindex))
        return comparator(A, Ak, B, Bk)
    else:
        return False

# Generate a list of powers of two for faster access

def generate_powers_of_two(hop_modulo):
    return [gmpy2.mpz(1 << pw) for pw in range(hop_modulo)]

def search(P, W0, DP_rarity, Nw, Nt, hop_modulo, upper_range_limit, lower_range_limit, powers_of_two):
    solved = False
    t = [gmpy2.mpz(lower_range_limit + gmpy2.mpz(random.randint(0, upper_range_limit - lower_range_limit))) for _ in range(Nt)]
    T = [mulk(ti) for ti in t]
    dt = [gmpy2.mpz(0) for _ in range(Nt)]
    w = [gmpy2.mpz(random.randint(0, upper_range_limit - lower_range_limit)) for _ in range(Nw)]
    W = [add(W0, mulk(wk)) for wk in w]
    dw = [gmpy2.mpz(0) for _ in range(Nw)]
    print('[+] tame and wild herds are prepared')
    Hops, Hops_old = 0, 0
    t0 = time.time()  
    while not solved:
        for k in range(Nt):
            Hops += 1
            pw = T[k].x % hop_modulo
            dt[k] = powers_of_two[pw]
            solved = check(T[k], t[k], DP_rarity, T, t, W, w)
            if solved: break
            t[k] += dt[k]
            T[k] = add(P[int(pw)], T[k])
        if solved: break
        for k in range(Nw):
            Hops += 1
            pw = W[k].x % hop_modulo
            dw[k] = powers_of_two[pw]
            solved = check(W[k], w[k], DP_rarity, W, w, T, t)
            if solved: break
            w[k] += dw[k]
            W[k] = add(P[int(pw)], W[k])
        if solved: break
        t1 = time.time()
        if (t1 - t0) > 5:
            print('\r[+] Hops: %.0f h/s' % ((Hops - Hops_old) / (t1 - t0)), end='', flush=True)
            t0 = t1
            Hops_old = Hops
    print('[+] Hops:', Hops)
    return 'sol. time: %.2f sec' % (time.time() - starttime)

puzzles = [\
    ('0209c58240e50e3ba3f833c82655e8725c037a2294e14cf5d73a5df8d56159de69',32),\
    ('03a2efa402fd5268400c77c20e574ba86409ededee7c4020e4b9f0edbee53de0d4',40),\
    ('025e466e97ed0e7910d3d90ceb0332df48ddf67d456b9e7303b50a3d89de357336',44),\
    ('026ecabd2d22fdb737be21975ce9a694e108eb94f3649c586cc7461c8abf5da71a',45),\
    ('03f46f41027bbf44fafd6b059091b900dad41e6845b2241dc3254c7cdd3c5a16c6',50),\
    ('0230210c23b1a047bc9bdbb13448e67deddc108946de6de639bcc75d47c0216b1b',65),\
    ('03633cbe3ec02b9401c5effa144c5b4d22f87940259634858fc7e59b1c09937852',130)]

puzzle = 45
for elem in puzzles:
    s, n = elem
    if puzzle == n: break

kangaroo_power = puzzle // 10
DP_rarity = 1 << int(((puzzle -  2*kangaroo_power)/2 - 2))
hop_modulo = ((puzzle - 1) // 2) + kangaroo_power
Nt = Nw = 2**kangaroo_power

X = gmpy2.mpz(s[2:66], 16)
Y = X2Y(X, gmpy2.mpz(s[:2]) - 2)

W0 = Point(X,Y)
starttime = oldtime = time.time()
search_range = 2**(puzzle-1)

lower_range_limit = 2 ** (puzzle - 1)
upper_range_limit = (2 ** puzzle) - 1

print(f"[+] [Puzzle]: {puzzle}")
print(f"[+] [Lower range limit]: {lower_range_limit}")
print(f"[+] [Upper range limit]: {upper_range_limit}")

# Precompute powers of two for faster access
powers_of_two = generate_powers_of_two(hop_modulo)

# Initialize variables
T, t, dt = [], [], []
W, w, dw = [], [], []

#Random seed Config
dd = list(str(random.randint(1,2**256)))
random.shuffle(dd); random.shuffle(dd)
seed = int(''.join(dd))
print(f"[+] [Random seed]: {seed}")
random.seed(seed)

Hops = 0
N_tests = 1

P = [PG]
for k in range(255): P.append(mul2(P[k]))  
print('[+] P-table prepared')

for k in range(N_tests):
    solved = False
    search(P, W0, DP_rarity, Nw, Nt, hop_modulo, upper_range_limit, lower_range_limit, powers_of_two)

print('[+] Average time to solve: %.2f sec' % ((time.time()-starttime)/N_tests))
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
February 17, 2024, 07:00:14 AM
#20
Every time I count I get hexan, not octagon. Why ?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 3
February 13, 2024, 11:35:47 PM
#19
No special reason when the topic goes in the way

Come on, genius, let's have a laugh together. Human invention is highly desirable, but we often confuse what we know with what we would like. Perhaps the Pascal's triangle would be a better suggestion?

Maybe it´s better to stop it, cold feet never, but some here in the board think they own the knowledge !
And i have figure out, when you find some "thing", maybe better to "be quiet", like my fan !

Last from me, all is about sections, nothing more.
And every section has his regular and his contra, if you know the distance between the sections, you can calculate with "simple math" the corresponding value.
The whole PK Universe is not 2^256 it´s way more smaller, but has different variants, that you can find in the individual sectors, if you know how (that´s why dividing is for some impossible).

And now, let´s laugh together.

I see what you mean here, I thought it was difficult to find distance between individual sectors and also I could not find a way to differentiate sectors.
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 2
February 13, 2024, 03:40:35 AM
#18
Please if you can show us the family relatives for this public key
Code:
02b5c3acff8a44ff0948bf094d949d1d39734318a752e6215169a835f72314a79a
I have a feeling that you can't.

5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip7CKpH45g4cagxfKaE
KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYvLz3frbdQx3dhXTqd5
Nice, now can you show us the other 15 points related to that one, which according to Op touch nothing?
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 11
February 12, 2024, 04:10:58 AM
#17
No special reason when the topic goes in the way

Come on, genius, let's have a laugh together. Human invention is highly desirable, but we often confuse what we know with what we would like. Perhaps the Pascal's triangle would be a better suggestion?

Maybe it´s better to stop it, cold feet never, but some here in the board think they own the knowledge !
And i have figure out, when you find some "thing", maybe better to "be quiet", like my fan !

Last from me, all is about sections, nothing more.
And every section has his regular and his contra, if you know the distance between the sections, you can calculate with "simple math" the corresponding value.
The whole PK Universe is not 2^256 it´s way more smaller, but has different variants, that you can find in the individual sectors, if you know how (that´s why dividing is for some impossible).

And now, let´s laugh together.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 1010
Crypto Swap Exchange
February 11, 2024, 05:36:45 PM
#16
Please if you can show us the family relatives for this public key
Code:
02b5c3acff8a44ff0948bf094d949d1d39734318a752e6215169a835f72314a79a
I have a feeling that you can't.

5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip7CKpH45g4cagxfKaE
KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYvLz3frbdQx3dhXTqd5

Interesting, care to elaborate how you found the private key represented by both WIFs? The hex representation of the private key is:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000001
(zeros greyed out, my old eyes almost missed the bit responsible for the hex 8)

Maybe there are tables of all two-bit private keys already generated and more...



OP, what's the reason to overwrite your original post and other removals in your thread? Fortunately it's still visible here and with some more digging your other removals, too. Did you get cold feet or are otherwise embarrassed?
member
Activity: 234
Merit: 51
New ideas will be criticized and then admired.
February 11, 2024, 04:38:46 PM
#15
Please if you can show us the family relatives for this public key
Code:
02b5c3acff8a44ff0948bf094d949d1d39734318a752e6215169a835f72314a79a
I have a feeling that you can't.

5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip7CKpH45g4cagxfKaE
KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qYvLz3frbdQx3dhXTqd5
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 11
February 11, 2024, 09:35:08 AM
#14
Come on, genius, let's have a laugh together. Human invention is highly desirable, but we often confuse what we know with what we would like. Perhaps the Pascal's triangle would be a better suggestion?

Keep on laughting my friend. But numbers never lie.

This can be delated or closed from the moderator, i have nothing to say more.  Wink
full member
Activity: 211
Merit: 105
Dr WHO on disney+
February 06, 2024, 03:50:31 AM
#13
Come on, genius, let's have a laugh together. Human invention is highly desirable, but we often confuse what we know with what we would like. Perhaps the Pascal's triangle would be a better suggestion?
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 2
February 06, 2024, 02:16:40 AM
#12
You know, if you guys share something more than a few dots connected by a few lines, we could determine if you have found a breakthrough or not.
But if you want to play with shapes, you could search mandelbrowser, install it and enjoy. Otherwise provide something more.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
February 05, 2024, 12:46:05 PM
#11
Best visual representation, that I can come up with, based on what's been said so far.



Four octagons, in the shape of a square. I took this as 2x2, stacked.

The yellow dots represent the 16 points that "touch nothing" and the green dots represent the 16 points that do "touch something".
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
February 05, 2024, 11:46:27 AM
#10
OP you promised to post screenshots.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
February 05, 2024, 02:01:37 AM
#9
My English is also through a translator. I don't know how it works, but I think you can post the photos here: https://www.talkimg.com/

OP, yes, you can use https://www.talkimg.com/, and upload your picture there.

After you upload it, copy the "Direct image link"; the link to your image.

Come back to this forum and make a post.

If you copied your image link that you uploaded on talkimg.com, just paste it where you want it, in your message/post.

Like this:




And now your picture should be posted.
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 6
Life aint interesting without any cuts and bruises
February 01, 2024, 08:34:48 AM
#8
OK i would like to say, till now i get all the puzzles from 1 to 65 faster than let´s say kangaroo, and the code i have, is write in python !!

I would like to put a picture here in, so maybe it explain more, but i don´t know how to do it.

My maths. but something is off. i still feel its not right somewhere.

Code:
import random
import hashlib
from sage.crypto.util import ascii_to_bin
from sage.arith.misc import random_prime
from sage.crypto.util import ascii_to_bin
from sage.crypto.util import bin_to_ascii

p = 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffefffffc2f
n = 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364141

E = EllipticCurve(GF(p), [0, 7])

r = 0x
s = 0x
z = 0x


G = E.point( (0x79be667ef9dcbbac55a06295ce870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798,0x483ada7726a3c4655da4fbfc0e1108a8fd17b448a68554199c47d08ffb10d4b8))   # Base point

def egcd(a, b):

    if a == 0:

        return (b, 0, 1)

    else:

        g, y, x = egcd(b % a, a)

        return (g, x - (b // a) * y, y)

def modinv(a, m):

    g, x, y = egcd(a, m)

    if g != 1:

        raise Exception('modular inverse does not exist')

    else:

        return x % m


def make_public(r, s, z):
    R = E.lift_x(Integer(r))
    w = int(modinv(s, n))
    u1 = int((z * w) % n)
    u2 = int((r * w) % n)
    u_n2 = modinv(u2, n) % n
    u_n1 = - u1 * modinv(u2, n) % n
    
    pub = u_n1 * G + u_n2 * R
    pub2 = u_n1 * G + u_n2 * (-R)
    return pub, pub2



def calc_u(r, s, z):
    mod_s = modinv(s, n) % n
    u1 = mod_s * z % n
    u2 = mod_s * r % n
    print("u1 =", hex(u1), "n-u1 =", hex(n - u1))
    print("u2 =", hex(u2), "n-u2 =", hex(n - u2))
    return u1, u2
u1, u2 = calc_u(r, s, z)

def verify(r, s, z, pub, k):
    w = int(modinv(s, n))
    u1 = int((z * w) % n)
    u2 = int((r * w) % n)
    D = u1 * G + u2 * pub
    x, y = D.xy()
    x = int(x)

    if (r % n) == (x % n):
        print(f"Signature k matches: {hex(k)} ")
        return True
    else:
        print(f"Signature k is invalid {hex(k)} ")
        return False

# Calculate the modular inverse of s (w = s^(-1) mod n)
g, x, y = egcd(s, n)
w = x % n

def find_k(r, s, z, pub):
    # Step 1: Calculate w = s^(-1) mod n
    w = int(modinv(s, n))
    
    # Step 2: Calculate u1 and u2
    u1 = int((z * w) % n)
    u2 = int((r * w) % n)
    
    # Step 3: Recover the elliptic curve point R
    R = u1 * G + u2 * pub
    
    # Extract x-coordinate from R
    x_R, _ = R.xy()
    x_R = int(x_R)
    
    # Calculate k
    k = (x_R - z) * modinv(w, n) % n
    print("k:",k)
    
    return k

# Call the function to find k
k = find_k(r, s, z, pub1)
print("Found k:", hex(k))

pub1, pub2 = make_public(r, s, z)
print("public_key1", pub1)
print("pub1_x=", hex(pub1.xy()[0]))
print("public_key2", pub2)
print("pub2_x=", hex(pub2.xy()[0]))
print("Step 1: Calculate g, x, y using extended Euclidean algorithm")
print("g:", hex(g))
print("x:", hex(x))
print("y:", hex(y))
print("Step 2: Calculate w (modular inverse of s)")
print("Calculated w:", hex(w))
print()


def find_k_bruteforce(r, s, z, pub):
    i = 1
    while True:
        k_candidate = (r * i + z) * modinv(s, n) % n
        
        # Verify the signature using the candidate k
        if verify(r, s, z, pub, k_candidate):
            print("Found k:", hex(k_candidate))
            break
        else:
            print(f"Attempt {i}: Incorrect k value {hex(k_candidate)}")
        
        i += 1  # Increment the attempt counter

# Call the function to find k using brute force
find_k_bruteforce(r, s, z, pub1)

def find_private_key(r, s, z, k, pub):
    # Calculate w = s^(-1) mod n
    w = int(modinv(s, n))
    
    # Calculate u1 and u2
    u1 = int((z * w) % n)
    u2 = int((r * w) % n)
    
    # Recover the elliptic curve point R
    R = u1 * G + u2 * pub
    
    # Extract x-coordinate from R
    x_R, _ = R.xy()
    x_R = int(x_R)
    
    # Calculate private key d
    d = (k * x_R - z) * modinv(r, n) % n
    
    return d

def find_private_key_bruteforce(r, s, z, k, pub, i):
    k_candidate = (r * i + z) * modinv(s, n) % n
    
    # Calculate private key d
    d = (k_candidate * r - z) * modinv(k_candidate, n) % n
    
    return d

# Call the function to find k using the formula-based approach
k_formula = find_k(r, s, z, pub1)
d_formula = find_private_key(r, s, z, k_formula, pub1)
print("Private key (formula-based):", hex(d_formula))

# Call the function to find k using brute force
k_bruteforce = find_k_bruteforce(r, s, z, pub1)
i_bruteforce = 1
d_bruteforce = find_private_key_bruteforce(r, s, z, k_bruteforce, pub1, i_bruteforce)
print(f"Private key (brute-force attempt {i_bruteforce}):", hex(d_bruteforce))

guessed_k_values = []
i = 1

while True:
    k = (r * i + z) * modinv(s, n) % n
    # Calculate R using the guessed k value
    guessed_R = k * G
    guessed_k_values.append((i, k, guessed_R))

    # Check if the guessed R value matches the original r value
    if guessed_R.xy()[0] == r:
        print(f"The correct k value ({k}) for iteration {i} is found.")
        # Calculate the private key using the correct k value
        d_bruteforce = find_private_key_bruteforce(r, s, z, k, pub1, i)
        print(f"Corresponding private key: {hex(d_bruteforce)}")
        break  # Exit the loop if the correct k is found

    i += 1  # Increment the iteration counter


newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
January 31, 2024, 04:59:17 PM
#7
My English is also through a translator. I don't know how it works, but I think you can post the photos here: https://www.talkimg.com/
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
January 31, 2024, 02:52:24 PM
#6
Are you explaining it so as not to say anything Smiley These brothers are keys with the same value "x"? Good luck counting your keys.
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 2
January 31, 2024, 01:47:13 PM
#5
Please if you can show us the family relatives for this public key
Code:
02b5c3acff8a44ff0948bf094d949d1d39734318a752e6215169a835f72314a79a
I have a feeling that you can't.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
January 31, 2024, 11:53:58 AM
#4
Describe how you find the private key from the public key. Is it a brute force method or can you calculate it without checking all the combinations. Can you recognize the parity of the key or whether it has a positive or negative value?
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 7410
Crypto Swap Exchange
January 31, 2024, 07:22:23 AM
#3
And how long it's needed to get a private key from a public key using your math formula and modern GPU?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
January 30, 2024, 12:00:47 PM
#2
The topic is good but I didn't see the light. Write something more.
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 11
January 30, 2024, 09:21:22 AM
#1
***********

Jump to: