Topic: Only Yahoo62278 allowed to make mistakes ? (Read 1194 times)

But he did that spam support in 2016 mate.




As you always do when you have no answers you start a new discussion. In one word tell me, while giving others red trust for spamming, is it fair to spam your own self knowing account sales encourage spam ... ? Jut yes or no .. you sometimes become blind man, open your cunt eyes and see it neutrally.
Well, cry me a river because you got demoted from a good position because of your cunt behavior ?

Personally I am looking for shorena and lutpin since @lauda is a asshole and been 10000+ times proven an idiots and I dont listen to idiots.

It is exponentially worse than it was before.

They are part of the spam problem. The staff is letting this happen due to the underlying corruption in BTCT. That's the only rational explanation that there is to this.

---

@OP, another shill that is butthurt™? You must be one of the recent additions to SMAS.

My look on it, it's a much bigger issue now than it was back in 2014 I'm assuming. I wouldn't know as I wasn't around, but it is definitely way spammyer here than back when I started in 2015. It wasn't great, but it wasn't this bad.

Idk, account sales sick but either way they're going to happen. It's the mega spammers that admins need to focus on and take down.

I didn't called you spammer if you carefully read again. He did that in 2016 dude while realized in 2014 itself that selling accounts is a spammy activity and selling accounts means contributing in spamming the forum .. in fact now he tell other people that they are account farmers and spammers. On what grounds he says that when he did that himself ?

My first question is, why and how can you call me spammer?

So now what's about you. If he did that things only in 2014 when such tasks weren't active, than lets leave it to history if we can but if he still continues to spam, farm and is against rules, than he deserves negative trust, it doesn't matter who will be.

I am ending discuss with this post now.

Dont be bogus please ..tell me your first question clearly .. I am not against the red feedbacks given by people, I am saying that if yahoo did the same should he not get -ve trust ? Simple thing.

Hope I'll get answer on my first question.
Now you say that yahoo is spammer and at the same time he is against spammers but..
What is your action now? You are using VPN, not VPS as you said wrongly. Let's hang on sigs and show your face with real account, why won't fuck that shit alt? Why do you afraid? Come and post from real account and hang on everything or door is open for quite.
Really, if you don't like situation here, feel free to leave or you have to adapt current situation.
If you have arguments and you are right, protect your right. I think yahoo will come here or any dt member will see this thread, let's wait and discuss with them.

The problem is not just that list. But a guy who is trying to show as if he is anti spam and then he himself promoted spam when even he knew that accounts selling promotes spam.

Had he not knew that account selling is spamm then I would say that;s fine but he knew yet he promoted spam by selling accounts.

How can someone be in DT and give neg feedbacks to spammers/account farmers when they themselves done the same knowingly.



my main account you want to know ? Hit and try method maybe works for you, as I am even using a VPS so IP also can't help you.

And dude don't post when you don't have any valid points.

What is your main account? You were banned from SMAS campaigns, I'm guessing. Probably yahoo's too. This is usually the cause of these butthurt threads.

Nobody is fucking perfect,  including yahoo, including me and everyone else.   Yahoo62278 IS a campaign manager, so he's definitely well within his rights to make a blacklist.   If you don't agree with it, you're well within your rights to speak out...but it's not going to change, and I think the list and the negs are given appropriately.

Wait man, why I can to spam as much as I want? How can you call me spammer? Because I posted here my opinion about your 4 question?
What do you want guy, if you spam, if you request high loans without collateral and farm accounts, you deserve red trust.
You are against yahoo and what can I do now? I don't know his past well and I can't say that he is bad person or good person, I am in neutral position. Since I don't know man, I won't say bad or good about him/her. Also don't know why is allowed mistakes from his side as you say, better to discuss with DT members.
Also will be glad if you answer me especially on my first question.
And why do you said nickname "Lauda" here?

suddenly all the Bitmixer guys have came here, you are safe too for one month, thinks  Lauda I guess:)

IKR? I hate it when he participates with 80 other accounts and posts 300 times in a day with those accounts and worse of all he doesn't let us to do the same, I'd say lets hang him by the balls or if doesn't have those then lets keep her for other bad intentions  

Yahoo and Lauda must go, just like there are people in every country saying their enemies must go not comparing but just like several groups saying Assad must go, think about it and you'll see the similarities this is how our world works.

I'm more interested here to ask the OP who are you talking to? who do you expect to take action here? people don't have time to take care of your BS.

@shield132 Well, one thing for sure is now u can spam mate as much as u want. Lauda wont kick u from bitmixer unless u abuse him personally.

------------------------

Let me post proofs then

1) - Asked for loans to build his reputation.

Read it full here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trying-to-gain-trust-via-loans-787932

2) Accounts sold in past

yahoo and sellsrmember are alts as proved here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13677235

and the account sellsrmember was made just to sell accunts only to help spam knowingly

3) - Supported a well known scammer GirlBTC by becoming a moderator on their forum ( for heavy funds )

A long story read here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yahoo62278-scam-support-behavior-and-complete-story-1754522


VERY IMPORTANT BELOW !!!!


YAHOO KNEW IT WAS WRONG SELLING/BUYING ACCOUNTS IN 2014 ITSELF BUT YET HE DID THAT IN 2016

http://archive.is/XUxhq#selection-3591.0-3600.1

here it proves he knows it wrong to sell and buy accounts.

and in 2016 via account sellsrmember he blatantly sold accounts.

If a guy knowingly promotes spam and helps spreading spam on what grounds does he disallow others doing the same

1. No one will give you red trust for simple loans, but if you request 0.1 btc and such amount while no one trust you, in this situation if someone will give you red trust, it's correct action.
If you tell me that you are at least full member with default trust and you requested 0.02 loan and got red trust for this request, I would say that person, who gave you red trust, was wrong.
2. Manager hires you in campaign because he/she hopes that you will make quality posts, he/she pays you for this. And if you are bad poster, than why do you want to be in campaign? Campaign is simply franchise, not obligation. If you want to get something, you have to deserve it and for deserve, you need some little or hard work.
3. Farming accounts - why? Can't you to post from one account? Because you aren't limited in posting, so there is no need of alts but wait, more alts in sig campaign means more income from sigs? And that's spam, farming isn't necessary and that's why it isn't allowed.
4. Supporting a scam means bad action because scammers lie people. If you mean campaigns here than I'll tell you that people are in betcoin.ag signature campaign and aren't red trusted but to my mind since you know that project is officially scam here and you still continue promoting, you deserve red trust and ban.

Sorry but I don't have answers on your following questions since I don't know that facts well and judge from my side won't be correct.

Only a few of them, actually. 

What incentive would yahoo have to unnecessarily ban anyone?  It's not like he's rich from creating a blacklist of spammers and users with malicious intent.

Feel free to give evidence for any of these claims.
That post was nearly 3 years ago, and he said "damn now i have to take the comment back".

That he would make a lot more for doing escrow services and managing the campaigns than for spamming.  His accounts would get banned if he spammed too obviously, so therefore the incentive would naturally be lost (you'd have to be in that sig spammer zone between getting banned from campaigns and getting banned from the forum).

Because other people don't run reputable services and they blatantly participate in shady activity.  I don't know where you're getting all of these claims from but you're more than welcome to post accusations like this in a proper format.

Note : This is a temporary account because once you post with yur main account, they make sure you are disabled from all sig camps and everything.

This thread I opened mainly because I see daily 100+ people getting red trust and disabled from sig camps for following reasons :

- Asking for loan without collateral
- Making bad posts in a sig camp
- Farming accounts
- Supporting a scam

and a lot more reasons.

Now my question is that, yashoo62278 who manages like 90% of the campaigns here at bitcointalk has committed these :

- Asked for loans to build his reputation.

proof : If a guy knowingly promotes scam on what grounds does he disallow others doing the same


- Sold accounts in past, farming accounts to sell them.

Proof : yahoo and sellsrmember are alts as proved here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13677235

and the account sellsrmember was made just to sell accunts only to help spam knowingly

- Supported a well known scammer GirlBTC by becoming a moderator on their forum ( for heavy funds )

proof : A long story read here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yahoo62278-scam-support-behavior-and-complete-story-1754522


Yahoo has been rude at times when he is himself wrong :https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818387.msg9160777#msg9160777
and a lot moe instances

My question is that if someone has sold accounts in past obviously for sig camps people buy then what stops yahoo from making his own shills and enrolling in his managed camps ?

If people like yahoo are given chances after chances then why not other people too ?