Orphan blocks at mining pools | Bitcointalksearch.org

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: enginera on January 30, 2015, 12:45:22 PM

Now I try 12 hours.

42Coin 0,01944 for 12 hours. (160 mh/s)
Rental price 0.01844

only 0,00100 BTC profit if every calculation is correct

I cant trust

The price of 42coin went down the last days, mostly ranged in 5-5.50 BTC per 1.0 coin. Or choose the autoswitcher which mines the most profitable coins (price, hashpower, difficulty) for the moment. Sell them i.e. on Cryptsy via autosell or collect and sell at higher prices.

enginera

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Now I try 12 hours.

42Coin 0,01944 for 12 hours. (160 mh/s)
Rental price 0.01844

only 0,00100 BTC profit if every calculation is correct

I cant trust

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: enginera on January 30, 2015, 11:02:24 AM

That was in Multipool and Fastcoin.
So; very low difficulties+big hashrates = orphans
I should choose harder coins next time.

Yes, with your hashrate you can easily mine other low-diff (probably diff between 1 and 10) coins with larger blocktimes. FST is known for that kind of problems.

If you are looking for a good multipool, i.e. for 42coin (less orphans than other pools), I can recommend Hash to Coins. They don't charge fees and have a good coin selection, you can mine with the autoswitcher or select a certain coin.

enginera

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

That was in Multipool and Fastcoin.

So; very low difficulties+big hashrates = orphans

I should choose harder coins next time.

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: tuaris on January 30, 2015, 08:32:59 AM

Coins with short block times (less than a few minutes) and low difficulties will always generate lots of 'orphans' (stale blocks) before you factor in latency issues. There is a lot that needs to be done in a short time with these very fast coins:

Pool receives work from Coin network
Pool sends work to miner
Miner sends work to hardware
Hardware find solution
Hardware reports back to miner
Miner verifies solution
Miner reports back to pool
Pool checks solution
Pool submits solution to coin daemon
Coin daemon checks solution
Coin daemon submits to coin network
Propagation

Between all that you have even more low level logic that adds additional time (TCP/IP handshake, disk access, string parsing, etc..). It's amazing how much happens in a short period of time.

Like he said. There are some coins with low block times that cause lots of orphan blocks, like Fastcoin or 42coin. And of course, it also depends on the ratio pool hashrate / network hashrate from a certain coin. With that much hashrate, you better try some other coins or a multipool.

tuaris

hero member

Activity: 780

Merit: 501

Coins with short block times (less than a few minutes) and low difficulties will always generate lots of 'orphans' (stale blocks) before you factor in latency issues. There is a lot that needs to be done in a short time with these very fast coins:

Pool receives work from Coin network
Pool sends work to miner
Miner sends work to hardware
Hardware find solution
Hardware reports back to miner
Miner verifies solution
Miner reports back to pool
Pool checks solution
Pool submits solution to coin daemon
Coin daemon checks solution
Coin daemon submits to coin network
Propagation

Between all that you have even more low level logic that adds additional time (TCP/IP handshake, disk access, string parsing, etc..). It's amazing how much happens in a short period of time.

enginera

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Hi,

I'm using some well-known mining pools with Scrpyt alg. With rented rigs.
I see many orphan blocks.

For example; the total hash of the pool is 500 mh/s. And difficulty is low -like 0.0644 for Fastcoin.
I've joined with a hashspeed of 350 mh/s into that pool.
Is my high speed a reason for getting so much Orphans? What should I do?

Look at the linked screenshot please.
http://imgur.com/wbgpqKp

https://i.imgur.com/wbgpqKp.jpg

Thanks.

Topic: Orphan blocks at mining pools (Read 2248 times)