Topic: Pagefile Benchmark Test Results (SSD Size) (Read 134 times)
That makes sense, thanks! Was trying to figure out how small I could get way with.
For mining, the ssd will not be too much used other than for pagefile which is little usage, so it will not have issues with fast ssd wear out over time. I would not worry much about it. 120gb is bare minimum though.
These benchmarks aren’t statistically significant.
Some algos on MPM threw errors, so I wondered if it had to do with my page file size (12x 6gb GTX 1060). I cloned the SSD to a larger one and increased the pagefile size. Re-benchmarked a 64gb drive with a 16,000mb pagefile, along with a cloned image on a 240gb 150,000mb pagefile.
It looks like some are better than others, but again, not too significant. Unless someone can explain otherwise?
Cheaper the better on storage mediums (SSD)?
64gb: https://imgur.com/a/zh9AK
240gb: https://imgur.com/a/8ADbG
Some algos on MPM threw errors, so I wondered if it had to do with my page file size (12x 6gb GTX 1060). I cloned the SSD to a larger one and increased the pagefile size. Re-benchmarked a 64gb drive with a 16,000mb pagefile, along with a cloned image on a 240gb 150,000mb pagefile.
It looks like some are better than others, but again, not too significant. Unless someone can explain otherwise?
Cheaper the better on storage mediums (SSD)?
64gb: https://imgur.com/a/zh9AK
240gb: https://imgur.com/a/8ADbG
Jump to: