I've got an XT node in my peer list - Bitcoin XT: 0.11 ip is 50.35.76.117
Topic: paging icebreaker re bip101 (Read 597 times)
Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
There is no mention on the Bitco.in forum of BIP101 being withdrawn.
Why is that?
Are they so poorly informed, or is the cognitive dissonance too great to confront until later in the grieving process?
I demand a Frap.doc greatly saddened reaction shot!
OK, found one!
the only force i see is the censorship 
tick tock
Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
There is no mention on the Bitco.in forum of BIP101 being withdrawn.
Why is that?
Are they so poorly informed, or is the cognitive dissonance too great to confront until later in the grieving process?
I demand a Frap.doc greatly saddened reaction shot!
OK, found one!
the only force i see is the censorship 
Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need.
It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase.
As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' "
Tick tock
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need.
It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase.
As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' "
Tick tock
You spend too much time over at the mental ward.
It is pretty sad to see you go down that road.
You still think this is about the blocksize? Heh, cute.
https://medium.com/@bramcohen/double-billing-is-not-healthy-competition-b698c345b11e#.88slddy5l
Now f0rk off back to your lair will ya?
Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase.
Is XT even maintained anymore? Didn't Gavin and Hearn abandon it? Who is left, toomim? Even he moved onto Classic. Bitnodes doesn't even track XT nodes anymore (either that or no one is running them). Seems rekt to me.
i am waiting a new ragequit. I hope that the next ex-developer use in his ragequit photo another carpet that Hearn's safari carpet.
Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need.
It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase.
As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' "
Tick tock
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329
For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need.
It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase.
As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' "
Tick tock
Jump to: