Topic: Paid per post conversations (Read 1661 times)
You guys are unreasonable and dont get the point, im locking the thread
No.
Your suggestion will only attract more spammers. Have you thought that in a single thread the conversation could go over and over again with the same thought just circling from person to person and people could make accounts to even talk to theirselves. Also who would pay you to talk? Signature campaign is here to advertize that is why they pay people to be constructive and social, if this will be altered, I don't think the forum staffs will share their revenue to people who will more likely post nonsense.
You guys dont understand, paid to post threads would be like an option, it will be similar to self moderation
Your POINT IS INVALID, try again.
Paid to post or pay by the post? The former exists, the latter is a stupid idea that would never fly. And not for nothing, I'm not surprised it's you who's suggesting it OP.
Paid by post, may you explain why you think this idea is 'stupid' ?not possible or else there will be very few users staying here if that happens. important topic or not no one will accept the hussle of sending payment over and over again just to post something and no one will want to pay just to say something
You guys dont understand, paid to post threads would be like an option, it will be similar to self moderation
Forum staff and admins already get parts of BTC from the auction of ads, for their contribution
Not going to happen.
pay to post won't help the community and eventually users may move elsewhere. there are existing forums related to crypto so not just users but also the gambling site owners.
Not gonna happen. There's no one who's going to pay to post, and it would cut down the flow of posts significantly. Do you know of any discussion forums where you have to pay to post?
Paid to post or pay by the post? The former exists, the latter is a stupid idea that would never fly. And not for nothing, I'm not surprised it's you who's suggesting it OP.
Paid by post, may you explain why you think this idea is 'stupid' ?Paid to post or pay by the post? The former exists, the latter is a stupid idea that would never fly. And not for nothing, I'm not surprised it's you who's suggesting it OP.
Paid by post, may you explain why you think this idea is 'stupid' ?Paid to post or pay by the post? The former exists, the latter is a stupid idea that would never fly. And not for nothing, I'm not surprised it's you who's suggesting it OP.
Paid by post, may you explain why you think this idea is 'stupid' ?
Paid to post or pay by the post? The former exists, the latter is a stupid idea that would never fly. And not for nothing, I'm not surprised it's you who's suggesting it OP.
I see where you're coming from, but it sounds ridiculous (to say in the least) to make people have to pay to converse with each other.
And plus, signature campaigns pay a lot more than a measly 5/15k satoshi per post. I could see a lot of people seeing that as a small price to pay for a larger bounty.
And plus, signature campaigns pay a lot more than a measly 5/15k satoshi per post. I could see a lot of people seeing that as a small price to pay for a larger bounty.
Paid per post conversations would be an epic feature for the new forum
When people are making a thread, paid per post could be an option, this will go a long way to keep signature spammers from your thread
The price per post could be like 5-15k per post satoshis and moneypot could be used to cut down on fees
The money can be donated to some charity or it could be used to help pay the staff
When people are making a thread, paid per post could be an option, this will go a long way to keep signature spammers from your thread
The price per post could be like 5-15k per post satoshis and moneypot could be used to cut down on fees
The money can be donated to some charity or it could be used to help pay the staff
Jump to: