Topic: Patent number 060606 - Humans As Cryptocurrency Miners (Read 753 times)

Indeed its an interesting idea but its also weird, I have no opinion on this tbh people be doing weird things

The reason is because this type of "transfection" based vaccine has NEVER been deployed before. The vaccine is NOT about the virus.The vaccine IS about societal change.The vaccine components are also subject to scrutiny but the vaccine itself in its complete form allows for many "features" that have never been seen or deployed into the human population that also have the future capabilities for updates that come on stream to interact with a whole new world that has been designed for human "resources".



~sympathy for the devil

Yes, in most cases, Gates used his vaccines in poor, densely populated countries like Africa. Statistics have shown that all of his vaccines had very severe adverse effects on the human body. When his vaccines were not used, the number of deaths and complications decreased.

Are we both talking about the problem in Africa where the mortality rate was so high that it became normal for a couple that wanted to raise three or four children to have 7 or 8 since most likely a bunch of them would die young?

These are the people he's trying to get healthcare to which is the first step to getting out of poverty. 

Yes, that is always the problem isn't it TwattySqueal. Everyone else just needs to learn more to come around to your way of thinking. It is not that you are incorrect, no, you are just more enlightened than all the plebeians who surround you. Just like Bill Gates! Hey skidmark, do you really think in modern times a man like Bill Gates, if he did have totalitarian and eugenicist tendencies, would be able to get away with just coming right out and saying it explicitly? Also are you aware he had a very close personal relationship with Jefferey Epstein?





https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates.html



"Bill Gates addressed his multiple meetings with Jeffrey Epstein: 'I made a mistake in judgment'"

https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-addressed-jeffrey-epstein-ties-made-a-mistake-2019-11?



"Jeffrey Epstein met with Bill Gates to discuss philanthropy after he was jailed for sex crimes: report"

https://nypost.com/2019/08/16/jeffrey-epstein-met-with-bill-gates-to-discuss-philanthropy-after-he-was-jailed-for-sex-crimes-report/

Weird he keeps repeating this "mistake" isn't it?



"A new MIT report on Jeffrey Epstein raises questions about how much to blame billionaires like Bill Gates"

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/10/21060678/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-reid-hoffman-silicon-valley

MIT? Interesting... they did the quantum dot tattoo research... hmmm



"Epstein’s 11th-Hour Executor Says He Won’t Serve for Estate"

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-19/epstein-s-11th-hour-executor-is-ex-science-adviser-to-bill-gates

An immunologist? Interesting...

You are an animal.  At this point in history the dominant species doesn't consider our meat delicious - but the only difference between a human and a dog is our brain.

I know exactly what he's saying. And the best part is that he is familiar with the reports on polio, malaria and human papillomavirus vaccines that were developed with support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Do you understand why and how he's 'reducing the population'?  That line is being taken out of context like crazy by anti-vax community.  Probably not intentionally by most, but you should listen to what he says instead of having someone else explain it to you.

If he wanted to help humanity, he would not have been involved in vaccines, but would have channelled his development funds into other areas.

Instead of reducing the world's population, we all need to look for alternative sources of energy and avoid pollution.

I understand your views on vaccines. I'm curious though, do you think Bill Gates is genuinely trying to do good and help the world?  Or do you think it's all an act and he has some master plan and doesn't really give a shit about the people he 'helps'.

"Next in Coronavirus Tyranny: Forced Vaccinations and 'Digital Certificates'"

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/april/27/next-in-coronavirus-tyranny-forced-vaccinations-and-digital-certificates/

If he wants to microchip people around the world, I have no problem with it. If Musk wants to microchip people around the world, I don't care as long as people have a choice. But if you listen to Gates' own recent interviews, he literally says that we, the people, think we have a choice - that's basically telling us we don't.

If people want to take that vaccine or microchip, let them take it. I can't convince someone not to take something if they want to - it's your own body, right?

Well, let's put aside all these so-called "conspiracies" for a moment. The strong recent push for mandatory vaccines & digital certificates makes me think: what's the purpose? In Romania they're looking forward to a new law that would obligate parents to vaccinate their children and not only get fined if they don't, but the children would also lose the right to education after all these fines.

It goes way beyond fines and loss of the right to education: you, as a parent, are obliged to visit a center regularly that has one purpose: to convince you to let your kid vaccinated. Does this direction sound right to you? Because to me it's basically the government enforcing a substance inside your kid's body. It's the state sending you to literal brainwashing centers where you will probably be reminded a gazillion times of the consequences if you don't vaccinate your child. Hell no - be it my body or my kid's, that substance gets inside the body only with my permission.

The endgame? Well, again, putting aside all "conspiration theories": my first and most important question is.. why did vaccine manufacturers request immunity from liability in case vaccines go wrong? What do they know and we don't? Because it looks kinda shady, don't you think?

Now add mandatory vaccine next to the fact that manufacturers have immunity from liability. Do you like the possible catastrophe you surely can imagine? If anything happens to 1, 50 or 100% of the vaccinated, nobody gets to be punished for it.

Okay, now let's move on to the digital ID. Yes, I have a phone, a PC and an internet connection. But at any time I want, I can go outside without any of them and enjoy a day of complete freedom. In my opinion, the endgame is gathering all possible information from everyone around the world for various purposes - why do they need to use fetal tissue for vaccine research? Well.. if there's a reason for that, there sure as hell has to be a reason behind this entire thing.

About quantum tattoos - I'm not an animal, why mark me? What about the "Mark of the Beast" from the Bible - will you enforce it into my skin if I am religious and believe that's exactly it?

Again - UK knew about the virus months before the world found out. Taiwan knew about the virus too. Then you take a look at events such as Event 201 and wonder what the fuck is up because the recent models are starting to show much lower death rates than we were told and Bill Gates said months before the pandemic publicly on Twitter that he surely knows 2020 will be the year for vaccines.. I mean, you guys call it a conspiracy. But how many coincidences there must be for you to realize it is actually a plan?

Lagarde said a while ago that old people are an useless waste of the economy. Well, if she wants to get rid of the old, then why doesn't she begin with herself & her family tree?

Have you seen the idiotic joy on Gates' face that appears specifically when he talks about virus deaths, lockdowns and so on? Are we seriously putting our freedom and bodies in the hands of a man with no superior studies who's experimented on & paralized children in various third-world countries and has been on Epstein's plane many times even after his conviction? And after all of this, you STILL believe he's doing a good for the humanity?

Why does a vaccine manufacturer and funder keep on trying to push mandatory vaccines? It's like me owning Walmart and I enforce all Americans to ONLY shop from me. Wouldn't it be fishy? I mean, very fishy? Especially if I said that it'd somehow reduce population growth by offering all Americans the best quality of products?

---

If you want to take 100 vaccines from Gates and even pay him for it or pray to God that he has a reserved spot in heaven, do it. But don't force me to take shit under my (or my kid's) body! And by "keeping social distancing measures until there is a vaccine I basically understand that once that vaccine comes, I'll lose my rights unless I take it. And that is sabotage.

If you think that's too extreme, China has already done it. Oh, the CCP is there, right? Well, did the CCP place most parts of China (besides the territories where the rich live, of course) under lockdown and enforce it by military? Did almost the entire rest of the world follow them? We're apparently praising China, why wouldn't we implement the exact same measures? I mean, we're already going for the digital contact tracing, USA wanted to use drones for surveillance etc..

The end-game is the following: control. Everything. Digitalize everything including fiat, shrink the people's privacy and freedom, let the elderly die away as "they're useless" anyway, let the world go into hunger mode and then enforce the vaccine. The vaccine I am supposed to believe is against the coronavirus, but a vaccine that never existed and we're only HOPING to get. A vaccine and the removal of our human rights for a flu-like virus (and the most recent models show it). Should make you think...

It's a fucked-up situation. When I first told my friends months ago about quarantines, digital contact tracing and enforced lockdowns, they thought I was crazy. Look where we are now - my "conspiracies" came true all of a sudden..

Edit: by the way, regarding conspiracies.. "Conspiracy theories" always mention Rockefeller being one of the top supporters of a NWO where microchipping is mandatory (you can find videos about this from decades ago) and it was a "conspiracy" - well, look who the partners of ID2020 are! Hmm, Gavi, Microsoft and Rockefeller are three of the Founding Partners and Gavi is "the Vaccine Alliance"... See a pattern?

This anti Bill Gates stuff is interesting.

What do you think his motivation is?

It seems like you think he's pretending to want to make the world better, but really he's only trying to make it better for himself.  Or am I missing something?

I read your whole post, and I think you've been misguided - will address later.  But really curious about what you think his end game is.  

@TwitchySeal

In all honesty, fuck Snopes and all these "fact-checkers" using any possible interpretation to make a piece of information sound their way. Many of the articles I've "fact-checked" with Snopes had effectively stupid arguments that prove nothing.

I'll leave here an older reply of mine:


Like dude. It's right in front of your face. They want the digital certificates, the digital IDs under our skin. ID2020, WO2020060606, Neuralink.. how many more examples do I need to give until we finally get to the conclusion that they're preparing digital chips? (btw: 060606, what were the odds.. so many coincidences.. oh, sorry, conspiracies again, right?)

---

Seems great, especially when you conduct experiments on Africans and Indians and claim to having saved lives. And then talk about reducing population growth and how "scary" the number of total population is going to be in a few years as if Planet Earth wouldn't be able to hold us all. Seems great. Just perfect. Would've been better if the population growth reduction started off with his family tree. Talk about the necessity of families to reproduce less but make 3 kids with your wife. Well fucking done.

Someone with no college leaving Microsoft to make a fortune off vaccines without any medical studies surely does gain my trust and convinces me to take their vaccines and microchips. I mean come on - it's not even as if he's pushing us towards the moment we fucking give him our money. We're already making them rich as small companies are closed and we all shop from the corporations only - all money goes in few pockets.

Also not a conflict of interests at all, indeed. Just a saint willing to save the world by reducing population growth! What a great cause, what an angel. Fuck him.

---

Listen to this homeless man from 1:03 to 2:09: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnh5OGwcWB0
"Conspiracy", huh..

Years ago I was used to being called a conspiracist, sometimes for stupid reasons.. but it looks like today they've been able to create this "conspiracy theorist" category literally any non-MSM information falls into. I'm surprised nobody calls us conspiracy theorists for stating that we're humans. No irony - it honestly wouldn't surprise me anymore at all.

So Gates is funding ID2020, has filed a patent for his crypto system using body activity data, has used some areas from Africa as testing areas for his quantum tattoos, has said with his own words that we will need digital certificates, Musk is developing his Neuralink which will apparently undergo human testing before the end of 2020, some companies are starting to microchip their own workers and so on.. yet, we're still debating and arguing whether this is on their to-do list or not... At this point I believe there's just no point in trying to convince anyone anymore, because when the thing becomes a reality people will forget these debates and say "well but Gates or MSM never said it's going to harm us!" completely ignoring the fact that they've been denying the existence of this plan to create digital IDs all their lifetime

If microchips are NOT what Gates is planning, why does he not come out and say the truth? Because I'm sure he wouldn't like all the hate on his social media accounts if it came from a lie..

---

Later edit:
I took this from the Description of the WO2020060606 Patent:


One particularly interesting thing is this quote from the same page:

Excuse any mistake. Had a long night and I'm tired AF so I may have made grammar mistakes here and there.

You linked to a bunch of interesting stuff, and they were credible sources.  But I'm just not seeing the connection between them and the patent we're discussing.

For example, the quantum dots.  They're just a way of leaving a little tiny message on someone that says 'i got x vaccine on x date'.  Seems like a great idea, especially in places like africa with poor record keeping...but the only connections I see with our discussion is they involve putting things into your skin and vaccines, and Bill Gates is involved in Vaccines and the Patent...

Conspiracy sites! Conspiracy sites! Conspiracy sites! That is the only fucking argument you have. I didn't link you conspiracy sites, I linked you MANY primary sources directly from the organizations behind these technologies. All you have are lame ass strawmen like a chump. You have no argument, all you can do now is repeat yourself and demand information I already provided and you have nothing logical to refute with but "CONSPIRACY SITES!" none of which I used for my sources. You are a disingenuous twat that cares more about feeling right than being correct.

The conspiracy sites that love to bait anti-vaxers any chance they get.  Show me your most legit source that confirms your "embedded chip in the flesh, not a wearable device" theory.

Microsoft files for a patent involving 'body body activity data'. => Microsoft was founded by Bill Gates => Bill Gates is throwing fuck tons of money at developing a covid-19 vaccine for the world => Bill Gates wants to insert his vaccine and microchip into everyone so he can take over the world.

What a great story to get clicks.  Every tin foil hat wackjob will spread the story like wild fire.



The cool things about infrared thermometers is that you don't need to stick it in someones mouth or ass or even have any physical contact to get a temperature.  

Those near-infrared quantum dots are cool, but they are more of an invisible tattoo than anything. That would be a cool way to store a private key now that I think about it.

No, I don't. I want you to take responsibility for your claims because I know how much of a weasel you are when you run out of logical arguments. The only way to hold you to your claims is a complete affirmative statement.







It appears your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired. You will note all of your statements marked in bold simply refer to the "user device" (130) that interface with the "sensor" (140) and make no mention of figure 145, the human body.

What sites TwattySqueal? You mean the primary sources from the organizations and individuals responsible themselves that I clearly referenced? Should I not believe their own public statements now? By the way you still have not addressed the fact that your premise is exclusive with the ability to patent a device or process.



Lets look deeper into the patent shall we?

"2. The system of claim 1, wherein the body activity sensed by the sensor comprises at least one of body radiation emitted from the user, body fluid flow, a brain wave, pulse rate or body heat radiation."

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTCLAIMS



Now lets look at the function of the quantum dot digital certificate technology.

"Here, we present an approach to encode medical history on a patient using the spatial distribution of biocompatible, near-infrared quantum dots (NIR QDs) in the dermis. QDs are invisible to the naked eye yet detectable when exposed to NIR light."

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162



Infrared radiation is also defined as "heat radiation" is it not?

"Infrared radiation is popularly known as "heat radiation",[21] but light and electromagnetic waves of any frequency will heat surfaces that absorb them."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#Heat

So in summary, a light or EM wave is technically within the definition of "body heat radiation" and falls well within the parameter of this quantum dot technology once implanted into the body. Perhaps more Snopes will help you?

Seriously?  You need me to hand feed you the text of the actual document we're discussing?

You spent too much time reading the click bait articles about the patent, and not enough reading the actual patent.  Stop letting those site explain stuff like this to you.  If you see a click bait article based on some other article or report (or patent), just read the actual article or report instead and make up your own mind.

Please quote the "literal reference" to "wearable tech" you claim this patent is referring to. Once again, you keep making the claim that this is not anything new and is just like devices we already have. I have already explained your claim to this effect is exclusive to what is able to be patented as already referenced.

Ah, "they may", "they might" wish upon the stars at night. Monkeys MAY fly out of your ass, but we don't have any evidence to that effect now do we? We do however have plenty of evidence that this is in fact what they do plan as supported by many primary references from the man himself and the various organizations he directly funds. Perhaps you can pull up some more garbage from Snopes and call me a conspiracy theorist a few more times in lieu of an argument?

Fair point. If someone did the research to how many patents are owned but not actually used by tech companies specifically, I'm sure the number would be staggeringly high.

The patent literally refers to wearable tech like phones or watches, which are already capable of monitoring your body in tons of ways from heart rate and temp to EKGs and blood oxygen levels.


They may not even be planning anything right now.  As soon as a tech giant comes up with an idea that might be valuable, they patent it.  It's like a lottery ticket.  All you need is 1 good one to make up for thousands of duds.

If they already have plans, I bet it's just some variation of the tons of fitness apps already on the market.  Don't see why the consumer would care if their steps were counted on a block chain or not though.

I think there's an argument in that. While there may be some truth to the patent with regards to the aforementioned claim, not every patent ends up being what conspiracy sites would like you to believe.

There's no evidence/proof of either for that specific patent AFAIK to lean it in one direction or the other (I could be wrong though). There is, ofc, evidence that tech companies have been eyeing implanted medical devices for a while (including microsoft). I think it's probably more realistic for Microsoft to patent something with regards to wearable technology (a technology they are publicly involved with), rather than planting a microchip into humans. Just my $0.02.

But let's face it, we all knew this day was coming. Eventually, there will be an option for chips to be planted. There are already medical wearables implanted already. Society will have to interpret/decide if the risk is worth the gain. Personally, I don't.

I do wonder if their justification for this is for the mining to offset the costs of maintaining said medical device.

This isn't an argument. This is a character attack. Pretty nuts how people think appeal to authority is a logical argument. Furthermore such a thing as you describe it would not qualify for a patent.

"Even if the subject matter sought to be patented is not exactly shown by the prior art, and involves one or more differences over the most nearly similar thing already known, a patent may still be refused if the differences would be obvious. The subject matter sought to be patented must be sufficiently different from what has been used or described before that it may be said to be non-obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the area of technology related to the invention. For example, the substitution of one color for another, or changes in size, are ordinarily not patentable."

"A patent cannot be obtained upon a mere idea or suggestion. The patent is granted upon the new machine, manufacture, etc., as has been said, and not upon the idea or suggestion of the new machine. A complete description of the actual machine or other subject matter for which a patent is sought is required."


https://www.uspto.gov/patents-getting-started/general-information-concerning-patents



The concept of using devices to monitor bodily activity with crypto using such devices is itself not novel. A device which can track and monitor body activity, if nothing more than a "fitbit or a smartphone", by your own argument and definition is not a new concept and therefore not patentable.


More references:

"ID2020 Alliance launches digital ID program with Government of Bangladesh and Gavi, announces new partners at annual summit"

"The American multinational technology company joined ID2020 in January 2018 as a founding partner. Members of the Microsoft team sit on ID2020’s Technical and Program Delivery Advisory Committees."

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/id2020-alliance-launches-digital-id-program-with-government-of-bangladesh-and-gavi-announces-new-partners-at-annual-summit-300921926.html



"Storing medical information below the skin’s surface"

"The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute."

http://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218




https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fksnbf/im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill_melinda_gates/fkupg49/

"I’m Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. AMA about COVID-19."

"Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it."




"DIGITAL  DOLLAR  WALLET.—The  term  ‘‘dig-11ital  dollar  wallet’’  shall  mean  a  digital  wallet  or  ac-12count,  maintained  by  a  Federal  reserve  bank  on  be-13half  of  any  person,  that  represents  holdings  in  an  14electronic  device  or  service  that  is  used  to  store  dig-15ital  dollars  that  may  be  tied  to  a  digital  or  physical  16identity."

https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/waters_146_xml_03.23.2020.pdf



"Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination"

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162




"Are Bill Gates and the ID2020 Coalition Using COVID-19 To Build Global Surveillance State?"

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-id2020/

"The study — which was not conducted on human subjects — did not describe the injection of a “microchip” co-administered with a vaccine. Instead, it described the use of something referred to as a quantum dot. These dots are essentially molecule-sized particles engineered to have unique structures that react to near-infrared light in a way that could theoretically be identified by a device such as a smartphone. It is physically impossible to implant a quantum dot sized device that could actively ping location or any other data to an unknown third party."

You will see the weasel words in bold. You will note, as Snopes often does, they add additional qualifiers in order to claim the whole of the implication is false. They claim because this specific device can not be used for remote tracking, that the claims are false. People object to being tagged like cattle. It has nothing to do with any requirement of being tracked like a GPS unit like Snopes relies on here to disingenuously claim via strawman that what people are objecting to is false.


Which of these sources do you object to TwattySqueal?

So, you've read the patent, and your conclusion is that they were intending to use it with some sort of device embedded in peoples flesh, instead of something like a smartphone, fitbit, watch...etc.

Pretty nuts how much influence these conspiracy sites have over people.

HAHAHAHA! Now I know you are desperate. Nice appeal to "authority", as if Snopes qualifies. Snopes is shit, and so are your pathetic attempts at an argument.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/microsoft-own-patent-666/

Last I checked, those devices aren't embedded in your body and can be left at home. Have you read the patent?



"Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified."

The entire concept of the patent relies on using the human body as part of the sensor. If it was not, all you would have here is a Fitbit with crypto taped to it, which would not qualify for a patent. You will also note in the image, there are no arrows going back and forth from the body to the censor, indicating that they are one device.

Let me know when you find anything that excludes a phone or smart watch, both already capable of doing the things described by the patent.

Read the patent.  Not the conspiracy blogs telling you about the patent.  The patent.

This guy gets it

Let me know if you find anything that excludes that potential. Maybe you can jibber some more about conspiracy sites. Better than admitting you have no argument right?

Here's the patent:
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTBIBLIO

Let me know if you find anything about embedding something into human flesh.

Conspiracy sites like M.I.T.?

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162.full

I know a lot of the conspiracy sites mention that, but from what I can tell the patent is for a back-end and what it does with data received from 'the device of the user' (which could be a phone, watch, patch, etc)

Do you think the patent is for a device that's embedded into human skin?

It is relevant because a phone is not embedded in your flesh. Your assumptions aren't evidence that there aren't malevolent motives.

Currency that monitors your movement will be very useful in controlling the spread of those new trendy schweet viruses that will be all the rage.Not too many leave their wallet at home...especially when its attached to you.Don't forget to set it for "automatic updates".New release may not be free of charge though although each new release of virus will  

~ID2020

I don't see how that's relevant.

Big tech companies look at patents like lottery tickets.  I think MS has almost 100k of them.  If someone comes up with an idea that might be successful at some point in the future, step 1 is patent it.

They probably thought it might be valuable some day for a health related mobile app.

You know it was filed almost 10 years ago right?

What made you click on it...it was the click bait headline on a conspiracy site wasn't it...

Do you have a strawman?

Do you have a phone?

Right now you can see the division of people into those who already know what awaits us and those who have not even heard of chipping. The worst part is that such actions against a person violate their privacy rights and depersonalize them. Many of the world's religions oppose the chipping, but it seems that the authorities have simply spat on religions and will discriminate against people who refuse to be chipped in order to create a society under their control.

That's a big warning sign it's like surrendering your freedom to do things and they will let you decide what you are going to do and they will compensate you on all your activities, the information is not fully complete but interesting to find out on how they are going to control the people in exchange for money.

No, basically  a signature campaign.

You may be right there but I think it depends on who is in control of the world government leader who understands his flocks would not do such a bad move thing as fully controlling his people. I believe that transparency is a must but we need to preserve human privacy too.
Let's say this chip can only track the record of your super evil deed murder, adultery, etc.. and not invade your other privacy stuff such as what humans normally do in private love and such.

Implementation of such a system of control over humanity is very convenient for the world government, because if you leave only one digital currency, you can not only track all transactions, but also prohibit the use of the system to an undesirable person.

Just imagine that we will all someday have a chip containing all the information about us, our movements and all our money. Let's say if my actions are not liked by the government all the funds on my family's chips will be canceled and we just can't buy food in the store. This could indeed become digital slavery and total control over a person's will and thought.

More like livestock inventory and control.

So basically a CAPTCHA?

You do what we want. We monitor your brain or your body to confirm that you've done it. Then we pay you.

This really does sound appalling. Total surveillance, using crypto as a lure. And apparently it's 'good' because it's not as resource-intensive as PoW...

What would be the significance of something like this? I read the patent info and don't understand how Microsoft could make use of a body monitoring cryptocurrency. Sounds like a dystopian currency with big brother always watching which would immediately be repelled.

Looks very interesting idea humans as cryptocurrency miners but what will they mine,
Assets of digital gold maybe the number is 666 looks like he is the beast lol

This is just my opinion
I rather not patent all of my idea and theory as a gesture and signs on how we should build a new Government called Hexagon Automata.
Patenting is a really old idea I say it is from the triangle obsolete order.
We should just share all the resources and everything we have to build one body of the United Hive System where we can just explore the universe and colonize the solar system.
An idea where I believe we can advance further away from slavery and achieve peaceful freedom.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTBIBLIO

Note the applicant.