Author

Topic: Pelosi's Office Was Directly Involved In Failed Jan. 6 Security... (Read 288 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Possibly Pelosi was under instructions from the FBI to not send protection in to protect the capitol.


At least 200 undercover fed operatives set up Trump trap on January 6, House Rep. reveals



https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-12-03-200-undercover-fed-operatives-trump-january-6.html
In statements he recently made, Republican Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana spoke about there being "at least 200" undercover federal agents embedded within the crowd at President Donald Trump's Jan. 6, 2021 event at the United States Capitol, which resulted in the infamous so-called "insurrection."

Some of these operatives were "dressed as Trump supporters," Higgins explained, noting that these infiltrators were also inside the Capitol building before the rest of the crowd even entered the building.

"The FBI was not just participating in the January 6th acts from within. I suspect they had over 200 agents embedded in the crowd, including agents or, as they would call it, human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened," Higgins told Newsmax presenter Chris Salcedo.

These same federal agents successfully infiltrated online chat groups, forums, and social media platforms where demonstrations were occurring against Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) regulations as well as against the fraudulent 2020 election results.

"And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you'll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group," Higgins said.

"So the FBI's involvement was deep, not just one J6, but on the days and weeks and months prior," the congressman added. (Related: MISTRIAL INCOMING: Video footage depicts gross misconduct by Judge Engoron's law clerk in Trump trial.)

Dozens of additional spooks hid in crowds outside Capitol on January 6
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
There was no insurrection on January 6. It was a lie. The videos show it. And this means that probably all the anti-Trump lawsuits are a lie, as well.

You insurrection believers are in the minority, and your group is growing smaller day by day. Besides the video in the website, below, this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=h7gx2Zr9Qnw.


How the Democratic Party Faked an American Insurrection



https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/11/no_author/how-the-democratic-party-faked-an-american-insurrection/
Last week, more than 40,000 hours of Jan. 6 Capitol Police security footage was released in the public domain that once and for all blew a hole in the pro-Trump 'violent insurrection' narrative so dear to the Democrats.

The one question on countless Americans' minds following the release of the damning videos was: will all those men and women recently locked away as political prisoners for dozens of decades get another day in court? Indeed, January 6 may have been a lot of things to many people, but another Boston Tea Party it most definitely was not.

Social media was alight over the weekend showing one benign scene after another of the 'insurrectionists' casually strolling through the Capitol Building premises, exchanging pleasantries with the on-duty police officers, even giving each other fist-bumps.
[VIDEO]
...



Cool

When one I supposed to check those hours of video which got released to the public domain, by the way? I have not yet found an official source to download those videos, I am not from the USA, so I am not accustomed to seeking for official information released by the government.

Also, I have read there are remaining hours of videos which have not been released yet by the Speaker Johnson. Is there something he is trying to keep out the reach of the public? Perhaps some congresspeople have been caught in camera going something they were not supposed to during the afternoon of January 6th? That is one of my theories/explanations if in fact he has not released the 100% of the footage.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
There was no insurrection on January 6. It was a lie. The videos show it. And this means that probably all the anti-Trump lawsuits are a lie, as well.

You insurrection believers are in the minority, and your group is growing smaller day by day. Besides the video in the website, below, this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=h7gx2Zr9Qnw.


How the Democratic Party Faked an American Insurrection



https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/11/no_author/how-the-democratic-party-faked-an-american-insurrection/
Last week, more than 40,000 hours of Jan. 6 Capitol Police security footage was released in the public domain that once and for all blew a hole in the pro-Trump 'violent insurrection' narrative so dear to the Democrats.

The one question on countless Americans' minds following the release of the damning videos was: will all those men and women recently locked away as political prisoners for dozens of decades get another day in court? Indeed, January 6 may have been a lot of things to many people, but another Boston Tea Party it most definitely was not.

Social media was alight over the weekend showing one benign scene after another of the 'insurrectionists' casually strolling through the Capitol Building premises, exchanging pleasantries with the on-duty police officers, even giving each other fist-bumps.
[VIDEO]
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Jan 6 defendants have long argued that the initial entrants were peaceably escorted into the building by Capitol Police, and therefore had no reasonable expectation that their conduct was unlawful

This video, suppressed for almost 3 years, confirms it

Wow, a video that doesn't show angry mob fighting police and breaking into capital to try to stop congress from certifying the results of the election. I guess there's no reason to consider these images, case closed.








^^^ FBI members and plants, and others basically hired by the Soros One-World-Government group. Basically NOT Trump supporters.

Was this guy a FBI member, plant or hired by Soros?


Quote
Fitzsimons drove alone in his pickup truck to Washington to join thousands to protest Trump's defeat as a stolen election.

Bragging about the event in a phone call to a meeting of his town selectmen the next day, Fitzsimons said, "Trump was the lion leading an army of lambs to change the corrupt fraud that had been perpetuated."

Quote
Defendant Assaulted Multiple Law Enforcement Officers, Including by Hurling a Spear, Throwing Punches, and Wrenching on One’s Body Armor, Causing Career-Ending Shoulder Injury
            A Maine man was sentenced today on multiple felony and misdemeanor convictions for his actions during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

            Kyle Fitzsimons, 39, of Lebanon, Maine, was sentenced to 87 months in prison after he was convicted of 11 charges, including seven felonies, following a bench trial in the District of Columbia before the Honorable Rudolph Contreras. In addition to the prison term, Judge Contreras ordered 36 months of supervised release, restitution of $2,000.

            According to the government’s evidence, on Jan. 6, 2021, between 3:45 and 4:30 p.m., Fitzsimons was illegally on the Capitol grounds and among a crowd of rioters brawling with law enforcement officers at the tunnel entrance of the lower west terrace of the Capitol building. Fitzsimons was wearing a white butcher’s jacket and a fur pelt and carrying an unstrung bow. While in that area, Fitzsimons committed five assaults against law enforcement officers over an approximately five-minute span.

            First, Fitzsimons hurled an unstrung bow like a spear at the group of law enforcement officers. The object hit an officer with the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in the ballistic helmet and bounced off. Fitzsimons then reached for and made forcible contact with an MPD detective immediately before another rioter sprayed him with a chemical agent,  trapping the chemical under the detective’s mask and causing the detective to temporarily suffocate. Fitzsimons also tried to pull a fallen officer into the mob. A sergeant from the U.S. Capitol Police tried to protect the fallen officer, and Fitzsimons grappled with him, yanking on his shield and shoulder strap with all of his considerable weight, causing permanent injuries to the sergeant’s shoulder that necessitated surgery and ultimately ended the sergeant’s lengthy law enforcement career. Finally, Fitzsimons twice charged the group of officers, wildly swinging his fists. He eventually retreated, but only after being inadvertently bloodied by another rioter’s unsuccessful attack on those same officers. As Fitzsimons left the Capitol grounds, he encouraged others to “get in there” and fight the police like he had.

            Fitzsimons was found guilty on Sept. 27, 2022, of seven felony charges, including: one count of obstruction of an official proceeding; four counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers, including two involving a dangerous weapon or bodily injury; one count of interfering with a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder, and one count of engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds. He also was found guilty of four misdemeanor charges including: entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; disorderly conduct in a Capitol Building or grounds; and committing an act of violence in the Capitol Building or grounds.

            This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Valuable assistance was provided by the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maine, the Middle District of Florida, and the Northern District of Texas.

            This case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, which listed Fitzsimons as #139 on its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance was provided by the FBI’s Boston Field Office and its Portland Resident Agency, the U.S. Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police Department.

            In the 30 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,069 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 350 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/maine-man-sentenced-assaulting-law-enforcement-officers-during-jan-6-capitol-breach
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Jan 6 defendants have long argued that the initial entrants were peaceably escorted into the building by Capitol Police, and therefore had no reasonable expectation that their conduct was unlawful

This video, suppressed for almost 3 years, confirms it

Wow, a video that doesn't show angry mob fighting police and breaking into capital to try to stop congress from certifying the results of the election. I guess there's no reason to consider these images, case closed.








^^^ FBI members and plants, and others basically hired by the Soros One-World-Government group. Basically NOT Trump supporters.


Jan. 6 Tapes Released -- Sorry, No Insurrection



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9vpQgGWc8
It's not called the "Empire of Lies" for nothing. Deception is the oxygen of empire. 44,000+ hours of January 6th footage has been released, and it's quite obvious as to why they weren't released in the first place. Also today, Javier Milei was elected in Argentina. Is change coming to the South American nation?
...



Cool

So you believe the FBI and all the other justice agencies and intelligence agencies are in favor of a left wing political agenda? Because to me it sounds rather like as contradiction if we remember the long and well documented examples of American Intelligence agencies being very antagonistic against governments and regimes which showed some leaning towards the political left.
Also, how many undercover agents do you assume there were in the Capitol back in January 6th, because I doubt the FBI sent as many as those hundreds of people how called for Pence's head or roamed in the halls of the Capitol shouting for Nancy Pelosi
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Jan 6 defendants have long argued that the initial entrants were peaceably escorted into the building by Capitol Police, and therefore had no reasonable expectation that their conduct was unlawful

This video, suppressed for almost 3 years, confirms it

Wow, a video that doesn't show angry mob fighting police and breaking into capital to try to stop congress from certifying the results of the election. I guess there's no reason to consider these images, case closed.








^^^ FBI members and plants, and others basically hired by the Soros One-World-Government group. Basically NOT Trump supporters.


Jan. 6 Tapes Released -- Sorry, No Insurrection



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9vpQgGWc8
It's not called the "Empire of Lies" for nothing. Deception is the oxygen of empire. 44,000+ hours of January 6th footage has been released, and it's quite obvious as to why they weren't released in the first place. Also today, Javier Milei was elected in Argentina. Is change coming to the South American nation?
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
-

Sometimes I feel I stand quite divided on whether it is correct to catalog what happened on the Capitol of the United States back in 2021 as an insurrection. I mean, there is no doubt there were people who drove to DC with the purpose of getting ready in case Trump invoked the insurrection act or something, as far as I know those convicted with charges of sedition are the easiest to earn the tag of insurrectionists.
On the other hand, we have others who did not plan to actually take down the government of the USA and simply went along with the mob, attacked officials and even broke windows... Perhaps, they were being used as part of a plan without them being aware of it. It is possible.

I personally feel more comfortable referring to most of those who participated in Jan 6th as rioters and the few who got sentenced because sedition as actual insurrectionists. After all, rioters is a term with goes accordingly with trespassers in federal grounds.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Jan 6 defendants have long argued that the initial entrants were peaceably escorted into the building by Capitol Police, and therefore had no reasonable expectation that their conduct was unlawful

This video, suppressed for almost 3 years, confirms it

Wow, a video that doesn't show angry mob fighting police and breaking into capital to try to stop congress from certifying the results of the election. I guess there's no reason to consider these images, case closed.






legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
The whole Jan. 6 conviction thing is a bunch of BS. Now the proof is coming out into the open more and more. Lots more at the website.


Cheney, Kinzinger, And "Sham" J6 Committee Under Fire After Friday Footage Dump;



https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cheney-kinzinger-and-sham-j6-committee-under-fire-after-friday-footage-dump-gop-senator
Ever since Friday's release of more than 40,000 hours of Jan. 6 Capitol Police security video, dozens of clips debunking the Jan. 6 committee's 'violent insurrection' narrative have been floating around X.

----------

Here's a January 6 video they've never shown the public.

A protester is uncuffed by Capitol police and then fist bumps another officer down a hallway away from everyone.

----------

Jan 6 defendants have long argued that the initial entrants were peaceably escorted into the building by Capitol Police, and therefore had no reasonable expectation that their conduct was unlawful

This video, suppressed for almost 3 years, confirms it

----------

Newly released footage of Matthew Perna (seen in red sweatshirt) shows Matthew walking calmly in the Capitol shooting video.

Matthew pled guilty to initial charges, believing he may face 6-12 months in prison.
 
Only after pleading guilty did the DOJ inform Matthew that they…
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Fact checking claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6

Quote
Facts First: The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance.

Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.


case closed.

Could you make me a favor and confirm whether this theory of Pelosi's guilt for what happened in the US Capitol has been repeated on Fox?
I wonder why it has became such an prevalent talking point in the political right there in the USA.

I am aware Trump suggested wrongdoing by Pelosi in some of his speeches, telling attendees he ordered officers and supporting agents to be there but someway the speaker of the house blocked all of it.
I know that Trump suggesting such a thing is enough for it to become an important theory among half of population, I just want to know whether Fox helped to spread it or not.

Trump said it, republican members of congress repeated it, and so did right wing media, including fox.

The claims have been that she denied a request for the National Guard and also the Capital Police on Jan 6.  But I can't find any evidence that the speaker of the house has any authority over either other than post Jan 6 right wing sources.  Basically anyone that's not a right wing partisan and qualified to speak on Capital security say it's nonsense.  The speaker of the house does not have authority over either.
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/28/false-gop-claim-that-pelosi-turned-down-national-guard-before-jan-6-attack/

And the fucked up thing about it all is the same people that are trying to blame Pelosi are the ones that are responsible for organizing the attack/fueling the anger with the lies about the election, that stood to benefit from the election being over turned,that have downplayed the attack ever since ("they were just site seeing" or "legitimate political protest!"), and defend the violent "patriots" that are now convicted felons in prison.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Fact checking claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6

Quote
Facts First: The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance.

Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.


case closed.

Could you make me a favor and confirm whether this theory of Pelosi's guilt for what happened in the US Capitol has been repeated on Fox?
I wonder why it has became such an prevalent talking point in the political right there in the USA.

I am aware Trump suggested wrongdoing by Pelosi in some of his speeches, telling attendees he ordered officers and supporting agents to be there but someway the speaker of the house blocked all of it.
I know that Trump suggesting such a thing is enough for it to become an important theory among half of population, I just want to know whether Fox helped to spread it or not.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Fact checking claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6

Quote
Facts First: The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance.

Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.


case closed.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
More evidence that Jan. 6 was all a setup.


Did Nancy Pelosi’s head of security PERJURE HIMSELF with a LIE about Jan. 6?



https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-06-nancy-pelosi-head-security-perjury-january-6.html
The United States Capitol Police officer assigned as the head of security for former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been accused of perjury after allegedly giving false testimony during one of the trials against the Oath Keepers organization.

U.S. Capitol Police Special Agent David Lazarus, a member of Pelosi's security detail, testified during one trial that he passed by Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn engaging with four Oath Keepers "three or four times" while he was evacuating Pelosi's staffers who were allegedly trapped in a locked office in her chambers.

Lazarus then went on to testify that he supposedly observed Dunn "arguing" with so-called rioters and that during his exchange, he saw an opening to "rescue" around a dozen of Pelosi's trapped staffers.

Lazarus further claimed to have several "antagonistic" interactions with Jan. 6 protesters. When he was shown a short cellphone clip of four Oath Keepers, Lazarus positively identified them as the individuals he observed who were being antagonistic toward him and Dunn.

"The problem with Lazarus' testimony about this significant event is that, according to direct video evidence the jury never saw, it never happened," wrote investigative reporter Steve Baker for The Blaze.

Baker explained that this video "appears to prove conclusively" that Lazarus was actually not with Dunn during the events he described but was actually in the lower tunnels that lead to the Senate office buildings escorting senators and their staff away from the Capitol.

"By analyzing the footage from multiple CCTV cameras and comparing the timelines associated with Officer Dunn's actual interaction on camera with the Oath Keepers, it is clear that Lazarus did not arrive [at the area] until three and a half minutes after the last of the Oath Keepers had left the area and were exiting the Capitol building," wrote Baker.

Lazarus' false testimony led to lengthy prison sentences for at least four Oath Keepers
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
When you look back at Central and South America back in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, you will find that the CIA caused all kinds of political unrest in those areas, by infiltration and assassinations. That the FBI might do something like this right in the US government is not surprising.

Cool

Right, The United States has a rather unsavory history of political interference in the south of the continent, but one should also acknowledge it is not the same to politically interfere in a foreign country in order to preserve your own interest than doing the same in your own soil.

There are more chances of negative repercussions to take place if such Interference happens in USA.

It is natural to distress those agencies, but one also need to keep one's feet on the ground what they can and would dare to do.

All of that is the same for any large country. What does 'US' stand for? United States, of course. Where is the unity? Isn't it found in peaceful, honest operations?

If Pelosi had granted the request for military-backed security on Jan. 6, the FBI wouldn't have been able to cause the trouble. But both Pelosi and the FBI wanted the trouble so they could blame it on Trump and his supporters to overthrow them.

So we see that it is the Dems and RINOs who are promoting the destruction of freedom and rights in the USA.


WRONGTHINK: Their Goal Isn't Election Interference, It's MAGA Extermination
Note that MAGA doesn't mean some kind of political mindset. MAGA means what the words stand for... Making America Great Again. They are trying to destroy American greatness.




https://rumble.com/v3n0kr7-live-wrongthink-their-goal-isnt-election-interference-its-maga-exterminatio.html
The deep state is going after Trump with everything they have. It's clear they want to destroy his campaign, but it's not working. Did you really think they would stop there? As it turns out, the FBI has been devising a secret illegal plan to target MAGA supporters this whole time. This was never about interfering in his campaign, it's always been about exterminating the movement that represents everything they despise.
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
When you look back at Central and South America back in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, you will find that the CIA caused all kinds of political unrest in those areas, by infiltration and assassinations. That the FBI might do something like this right in the US government is not surprising.

Cool

Right, The United States has a rather unsavory history of political interference in the south of the continent, but one should also acknowledge it is not the same to politically interfere in a foreign country in order to preserve your own interest than doing the same in your own soil.

There are more chances of negative repercussions to take place if such Interference happens in USA.

It is natural to distress those agencies, but one also need to keep one's feet on the ground what they can and would dare to do.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
When you look back at Central and South America back in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, you will find that the CIA caused all kinds of political unrest in those areas, by infiltration and assassinations. That the FBI might do something like this right in the US government is not surprising.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This info has been out in the open for some time. But nobody seems interested in advertising it or acting on it.


How The FBI Planned the January 6 Operation



https://greatgameindia.com/how-the-fbi-planned-the-january-6-operation/
Cara Castronuovo of The Gateway Pundit writes on a stunning development in the US government's prosecution of the Proud Boys in February of this year.

It was found that the mysterious "1776 Returns" (pdf below) paper was actually written by the government.

A nine-page study with the working title "1776 Returns" described tactical tactics for the seizure of US federal facilities on January 6, 2021.

In court, it was established that the document's author was an FBI agent and that the FBI was responsible for its creation.

Just before January 6th, a "love interest" called Erika Flores emailed the enigmatic paper to Proud Boy Chairman Enrique Tarrio's Telegram address without his permission.

The totality of the "1776 Returns" were allegedly written by a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL, and Flores said in her testimony to the January 6th Committee that this official asked her to share them with Tarrio.

Tarrio and four other Proud Boys members were convicted guilty of seditious conspiracy after being accused of it. Enrique Tarrio received a 22-year prison term for orchestrating the entire "seditious conspiracy." We now know that the FBI was the driving force behind the plot.
...



Cool

So, according to this investigation, the FBI was the one who planned Jan 6 to take place and then,  one the wrote a document detailing the possible moves to be taken by the rioters, they (the FBI) shared that document to Proud Boys in order to incite them into breaking in the capitol.

To be honest, I would not be the first time a government agency like the FBI tried to incite some unrest to happen, so they can arrest people. However, Trump being the president of the United States and having authority over the FBI and other federal agencies, he could have done something to prevent agents to do this (assuming it actually happened).

I think it will be just matter of time before Tucker Carlson covers this, is consistent with his theories on undercover agents on Jan 6th
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
This info has been out in the open for some time. But nobody seems interested in advertising it or acting on it.


How The FBI Planned the January 6 Operation



https://greatgameindia.com/how-the-fbi-planned-the-january-6-operation/
Cara Castronuovo of The Gateway Pundit writes on a stunning development in the US government's prosecution of the Proud Boys in February of this year.

It was found that the mysterious "1776 Returns" (pdf below) paper was actually written by the government.

A nine-page study with the working title "1776 Returns" described tactical tactics for the seizure of US federal facilities on January 6, 2021.

In court, it was established that the document's author was an FBI agent and that the FBI was responsible for its creation.

Just before January 6th, a "love interest" called Erika Flores emailed the enigmatic paper to Proud Boy Chairman Enrique Tarrio's Telegram address without his permission.

The totality of the "1776 Returns" were allegedly written by a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL, and Flores said in her testimony to the January 6th Committee that this official asked her to share them with Tarrio.

Tarrio and four other Proud Boys members were convicted guilty of seditious conspiracy after being accused of it. Enrique Tarrio received a 22-year prison term for orchestrating the entire "seditious conspiracy." We now know that the FBI was the driving force behind the plot.
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
If there really was a riot by the average protestors, the police incited it. It was police brutality that did it.


Video: January 6th Was a Police Riot, Cops Admit to Attacking 'Innocent' Protestors



https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-january-6th-was-a-police-riot-cops-admit-to-attacking-innocent-protestors/
A Twitter thread released this week by @InvestigateJ6 serves as a trove of information and video footage as to the truth of what happened during the January 6th demonstrations. Video footage contained in the thread documents the coordinated efforts by DC's Metropolitan Police Department, the federal Capitol Police Department, and other law enforcement outfits to inflict maximum "pain" on January 6th demonstrators.

In bringing maximum "pain" to the American people, even the cops captured in the footage admitted at the time that they'd only incited a riot and were injuring up to 10 "innocent" people each time they hurled explosives, fired tear gas and shot "nonlethal" projectiles into the crowd.

"What led to the storming of the US Capitol on January 6th?" @InvestigateJ6 asked, kicking off the "POLICE BRUTALITY evidence thread" that blows the lid off of the uni-party, corporate media narrative of the January 6th, 2021 protests on Capitol Hill.

As has been described by numerous protesters who were on the ground on January 6th, the video footage shows that the already tense mood around the Capitol took a serious turn into dangerous territory when DC's Metropolitan Police Department, under the direct command of Black Lives Matter Mayor Muriel Bowser, arrived on the scene.

In one video segment, an MPD officer frantically demands to be given "blast munitions" to use against the crowd.

"Hey, we need more fucking munitions!" the MPD officer shouts on video. "We need blast munitions! What do we got?" he asks, only to be told that there are none available.

"God damn, we've got to get something!" he shouts.
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Now we get to finally see just exactly how much of the January 6 riots were really riots, and who the rioters really were. Be patient. It's going to take a while for Tucker and his team to evaluate 41,000 hours of Jan. 6 video.


HUGE: House Speaker McCarthy Handed Over 41,000 Hours of Jan 6 Video to Tucker Carlson



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/breaking-house-speaker-mccarthy-handed-over-41000-hours-of-jan-6-video-to-tucker-carlson/
Multiple sources are reporting that House Speaker McCarthy handed over 41,000 hours of Jan 6 Capitol footage to Tucker Carlson at FOX News.

The Real Toria Brooke
@therealtoriabrooke


AXIOS also reported on this moments ago:

-    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has given Fox News’ Tucker Carlson exclusive access to 41,000 hours of Capitol surveillance footage from the Jan. 6 riot, McCarthy sources tell me.

-    Carlson TV producers were on Capitol Hill last week to begin digging through the trove, which includes multiple camera angles from all over Capitol grounds. Excerpts will begin airing in the coming weeks.

No entity has done more to report on the real events on Jan 6 than The Gateway Pundit.

TGP has produced a list of Americans who were wrongly accused, arrested and jailed since that day.  The real criminals that day were the Deep State Feds and the politicians involved in setting up Trump supporters in an effort to prevent discussions on the stolen election that day.
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Now Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra, is admitting from firsthand, direct observation and actions that the whole Jan. 6 riot was a setup.


NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi’s Filmmaker Daughter Alexandra Pelosi Caught on Tape REFUTING J6 NARRATIVE – Admitting Jan. 6 Protests Not an Insurrection, DC Courts Too Biased



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/never-seen-video-nancy-pelosis-filmmaker-daughter-alexandra-pelosi-caught-tape-refuting-j6-narrative-admitting-jan-6-protests-not-insurrection-dc-courts-biased/
Nancy Pelosi's daughter Alexandra Pelosi is producing an HBO documentary about the January 6, 2021, protests and riot in Washington DC.

In October 2022, CNN released never-before-seen footage of Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell inside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 — the two people who refused to call in the National Guard prior to that day and during the rioting.

The footage was filmed by Nancy's daughter Alexandra. Nancy's son-in-law was outside during the protests filming the "insurrection."

...

Here are some of the key moments in the video where Alexandra makes some particularly audacious comments.
Key moments:
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
To show that the Jan. 6 courts are a political thing, and not a real damage thing, consider the below. This is people being convicted for exercising their freedom rather than for wrongdoing.


Arizona Oath Keeper Described as ‘Cooking for Protesters’ on January 6 Convicted of Seditious Conspiracy



https://thestarnewsnetwork.com/2023/01/28/arizona-oath-keeper-described-as-cooking-for-protesters-on-january-6-convicted-of-seditious-conspiracy/
A jury convicted Arizona Oath Keeper Edward Vallejo of seditious conspiracy and other charges on Monday for his involvement with the protest on January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol. Three other Oath Keepers were also convicted of that and other lesser offenses. The 63-year-old Army veteran's defense attorney, Matthew Peed, said he plans to appeal.

"Ed brought 30 days of food with him, not just for himself but for a group, and he believed he was going to a campground where he would set up a food kitchen and cook for protesters," Peed defended Vallejo's role during opening statements. "And it would be kind of a, kind of like a festival."

Vallejo worked security for Donald Trump associate Roger Stone on the day before January 6, at the Rally to Save America at Freedom Plaza. He and other Oath Keepers paid for four rooms at Comfort Inn in Arlington, Virginia, and Vallejo never left the hotel during January 6. Vallejo, who works as an Alcoholics Anonymous sponsor in his free time, was not arrested until a year after January 6. Peed said he never took any action, and he thought he was merely supporting peaceful protesters. Vallejo did not go to the Capitol or deliver weapons there. He brought 200 pounds of food and supplies, intending to cook for those participating in the protest.

When Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, a graduate of Yale Law School, suggested Vallejo and others delete their texts in a group chat, Vallejo declined, stating he had nothing to hide. "Oh, I got that (call to delete evidence) but I didn't do anything wrong and I was at the hotel when things got wonky," Vallejo texted Rhodes, adding, "running and hiding is what GUILTY people do."

Since the Oath Keepers, who always carry firearms, had weapons in their hotel room, the prosecution asserted that the group had "stockpiled" an "arsenal" in preparation for violence. But Peed said its "quick reaction forces" were a defensive group only, ready to come to the defense of any Oath Keeper who needed protection.
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
The point wasn't Pelosi's security and safety. The point was the safety of the Capitol.

Pelosi was asked by members of Congress and others, to authorize strengthening of Capitol security. She wouldn't do it. By not doing it, she essentially had a role in the Jan. 6 rioting. She should be on trial with the other rioters... as one of the leaders, and the perpetrator.

If she had strengthened Capitol security as she was asked, the whole riot would have broken down before it got started. And there wouldn't even be any accusation against Trump. Since she wanted an excuse to accuse Trump (even though he didn't have anything to do with it), she kept the security lax, so that anybody could have done the rioting.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So what about the footage of Pelosi and other congressmen and congresswomen calling to Pentagon officials from a secured location during the events of January 6?
Allegedly some family member or Pelosi was there with them and recorded it all because she was filming a documentary film that day on the Capitol or something.

I would make sense it was in the best interest of Nancy not to get physically assaulted by people who was looking for her.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Looks like Pelosi and her crew let the Soros-paid rioters into the Capitol.


Pelosi's Office Was Directly Involved In Failed Jan. 6 Security, Texts And Emails Reveal


Did Pelosi's office set Capitol Police up to fail?

According to a trove of text and email messages made public Wednesday by House Republicans, the Capitol was left vulnerable on Jan. 6 as a result of failures by Democratic leadership in the House as well as law enforcement officials in the Capitol Police, who let concerns over the "optics" of armed officers and National Guardsmen take precedent over an appropriate level of staffing given the obvious protests which were about to occur.

The report, compiled by GOP Reps. Rodney Davis, Jim Banks, Troy Nehls, Jim Jordan and Kelly Armstrong, covers the results of months of investigation surrounding the events of Jan. 6, which the Democrat-led J6 Committee failed to conduct, Just the News reports.

"Leadership and law enforcement failures within the U.S. Capitol left the complex vulnerable on January 6, 2021. The Democrat-led investigation in the House of Representatives, however, has disregarded those institutional failings that exposed the Capitol to violence that day," concludes the GOP report, which also highlighted that Capitol Police began receiving specific warnings in December over potentially significant violence planned against the Capitol and lawmakers by angry protesters who planned to contest the certification of the 2020 election results.

"Prior to that day, the U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) had obtained sufficient information from an array of channels to anticipate and prepare for the violence that occurred," reads the report. "On January 6, 2021, criminal rioters assaulted police officers, broke into the U.S. Capitol, damaged property, and temporarily interfered with the certification of states' presidential and vice presidential electors at the Joint Session of Congress—a typically pro forma event."

...


Cool
Jump to: