For me, what's more surprising is the "mass or union voting of one religion wherein they require all the members of a church to vote for particular candidate/s.
Ah, the classic religious persuading! I saw from the news that one of the major religious groups here in the Philippines started to endorse a list of candidates which in my opinion, are the worst from all the participants. Not only they endorsed candidates that are corrupt but also they included thieves, liars, and incompetent ones which are against what they are promoting for. They say that they uphold their 'morals and values' but their decision says otherwise.
Again, there is something called separation of the church and state but if the religious groups MANDATE their own members to vote for a particular list of candidates (which is for their best interest), then this is a clear violation.
That is right but at least he is being honest and he is willing to learn. It is not just about making a certain laws but it is all about creating a law that is followed. In the previous elections we have been voting a lot of lawyers but what have they done? Nothing and guess what they've been only getting the funds for their gains.
Stop under estimating people and stop being hypocrite, Look at what manny pacquiao have done in the senate? being the low class because of not having a high level of educational background. He has done more things than the other lawyers you people are talking about.
You do talk about sh*ts after looking at how they perform and for now shutting up your mouth and respecting their wins can be the very best thing you can do for your country.
Let me argue in the first paragraph: suppose you went to visit a hospital and ask for a prescription for your illness and then someone approaches you saying that he cannot give or prescribe anything BUT HE IS WILLING TO LEARN ABOUT IT. If
honesty and the willingness to learn are the determining factor in order to get a spot in the legislative branch, then sign everyone up!
Let us now talk about Senator Pacquiao. I watched a video of him in the Senate arguing against Senator Drilon over the creation of a Philippine Boxing Commission. Hell, he cannot even answer the questions on his own! He has people coaching and whispering him at the back just to speak an answer to Drilon's remarks! I am not invalidating that Pacquiao is a bad guy but the question falls on competency. Oh yeah, do not forget the number of absences he already incurred in the Senate!
The point is, there are better and competent candidates on the list who were not given a chance due to the voting done by these people.