Quote
Many companies make expiration dates for points. For example, a company might pay points to a
customer and then set it to use for only five years. From the customer's point of view, this method
makes the point disappear every year without knowing where and how much of it is. In fact, the
survey shows that 25% of users have lost their points because the points had been expired. This
disappearing point leads to unnecessary social and technological costs, and to a loss to the market
economy.
customer and then set it to use for only five years. From the customer's point of view, this method
makes the point disappear every year without knowing where and how much of it is. In fact, the
survey shows that 25% of users have lost their points because the points had been expired. This
disappearing point leads to unnecessary social and technological costs, and to a loss to the market
economy.
Seems like they are concluding things that aren't necesserily told by this data. If they want to proof that it does they should provide more information. Because I don't see any direct loss of people losing loyatly program points to our economy, some people just simply don't use these things. We have no demograph of the people that are surveyed nor is there enough depth in this information for anyone to make the conclusions the author does. Also where are its sources for this ''survey''? I bet they just googled something and copy pasted it. Or there is no survey, because if there is one, they are legally oblidged to mention the source and give credit. And if they made the survey themselves whats holding them back to publish it for investors?
Like I said before, getting scammy vibes, whitepaper looks unprofessional aswell, just a sales pitch ungrounded in the real world.
Last question, what part of this is trustless? Why does it need a blockchain?
No MVP or prototype aswell, just promises of a bunch of products that will probably never be used anyway.
There are many better ICOs, I didn´t hear about this, why they are so good? 