[Poll] How does Lemakasidion compare?

Grand_Voyageur

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!

Quote from: panju1 on October 03, 2014, 02:43:31 AM

Genghis Khan helped remove nearly 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere. Grin

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1350272/Genghis-Khan-killed-people-forests-grew-carbon-levels-dropped.html

I am worried how much time will pass before someone estimate the amount of carbon remove from atmosphere by Hitler genocidal policies and suggest they were good for the human race.
Angry

panju1

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

Genghis Khan helped remove nearly 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere. Grin

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1350272/Genghis-Khan-killed-people-forests-grew-carbon-levels-dropped.html

Apraksin

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 251

Moon?

Caesar, although never named emperor(but frequently imperator). Dictator will have to suffice. Raw political talent, tactical and strategical genius and accomplished author who reformed the bogged down Roman res publica and thus crafted an empire that would partly survive to the fall of Constantinopel.

mr.coinstrader

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 250

ALEXANDER THE GREAT he was the creator of one of the largest empires in ancient history, . He was undefeated in battle and is considered one of the most successful commanders of all time

Rishblitz

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

I'm nothing without GOD

Napoleon pulled france out of the gutter from revolution so I gotta say he should defiantly be in the top 2.

panju1

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

Genghis Khan.

fluffyponyza

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

I think Napoleon is the greatest among all of them.

Bonam

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: TaunSew on September 25, 2014, 07:45:58 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_V,_Holy_Roman_Emperor

Charles V was perhaps the greatest Emperor in European history, controlled like a third of Europe and most of the Americas.

Coming into ownership of a lot of lands by fortune of birth is not a sign of greatness in the sense being discussed... forging an empire out of nothing is. Those few individuals in history who were able to take a tiny nation and forge with it a vast empire are, in my mind, the only real candidates for "greatest emperor".

TaunSew

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 506

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_V,_Holy_Roman_Emperor

Charles V was perhaps the greatest Emperor in European history, controlled like a third of Europe and most of the Americas.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: OgNasty on September 25, 2014, 06:19:01 PM

This poll is missing the obvious answer to this question...

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Emeprors are the subject of this poll, not central bankers.

I guess it is still too early for some to see the Central Banking Empire for what it is.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

This poll is missing the obvious answer to this question...

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

This poll miss the option: None of them.

username18333

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Knowledge could but approximate existence.

Quote from: Tusk on September 25, 2014, 02:17:30 PM

Kill somebody = Murder (Bad!)
Kill manny = Mass Murder (Very Bad!!)
Slaughter Thousands = A Conquer (Hero!!!)
Huh

Vote for one that didn't kill anyone then. Wink

Tusk

sr. member

Activity: 444

Merit: 260

Kill somebody = Murder (Bad!)
Kill manny = Mass Murder (Very Bad!!)
Slaughter Thousands = A Conquer (Hero!!!)
Huh

Lady_Cake

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Alexander without any doubt! He was the best military leader and he conquered quietly the world.
Also politically didn't have lot of rivals.

TrailingComet

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Akbar the Great
Ashoka the Great
Hard to look beyond Alexander and Genghis for obvious reasons

QuantumLeap

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

No one can defeat Genghis Khan's record. Start from nothing he build a country then created his own empire the biggest continuous land empire.

Snail2

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

You might wanna add Genghis Khan to the list.

username18333

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Knowledge could but approximate existence.

Quote from: Lethn on September 22, 2014, 08:16:36 AM

Where the fuck is Constantine the founder of the Byzantine Empire you ignorant bastard? And who said it was okay for you to make a self-moderated thread about the greatest emperors in history?

Whom indeed.

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

Where the fuck is Constantine the founder of the Byzantine Empire you ignorant bastard? And who said it was okay for you to make a self-moderated thread about the greatest emperors in history?

noviapriani

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Napoleon was a good leader in terms of making people follow him. he was a brilliant military leader in that he knew how to win battles, and the human psychology that leads to military and political success.

sana8410

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

The man brought down the greatest empire the world had seen, seemingly without difficulty and within a matter of just a couple of years, conquered most of the known world while fighting far from home, never lost a battle, led from the front, was tutored by Aristotle and maintained his passion for philosophy throughout his life, spread Greek culture across the globe … you get the idea. Oh, and he did all of this before the age of 33. Perhaps the clincher, however, is this: Julius Caesar weeped when he considered Alexander’s accomplishments.

Bonam

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Out of the available options, I'd say Alexander:

1) Little is known of Nimrod factually
2) Caesar was never emperor and despite his fame didn't actually conquer that much in the grand scheme of things
3) Napoleon was largely a failure and his empire crumbled away quickly
4) Don't know who "Limakasidios" is... think the OP made up this name

Meanwhile the ramifications of Alexander's conquests and empire ripple through civilization to this day.

In regards to Genghis, the ramifications of the Mongol conquests are felt throughout the world to this day as well. They reshaped China, central Asia, Russia, and the middle east, and kickstarted the ties and trade between the West and East. If Genghis had been on the list, it would have been a hard choice between him and Alexander, but as it is, Alexander is the obvious choice.

Honeypot

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Alexander, no doubt about it. The guy conquered the equivalent of the globe and moon and mars if you consider the technology and means with which he had to work with, not to mention a relatively small nation being his foundation to conquering an entire empire.

Ghengis Khan was a conqueror, but not an emperor. Greek and hellenic influences are still felt throughout the middle east and even northern india today, where as mongols conquered but were assimilated completely. That disqualifies that candidate as an 'emperor'.

username18333

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Knowledge could but approximate existence.

So as to mitigate the ill effects of group think, the results of this poll are only available to those that have participated in it.

Topic: [Poll] How does Lemakasidion compare? (Read 1936 times)