I cant follow you, how Im trolling. Its seems however the person behind OP is more important than the topic. Which certanily was not my intention. I could question what exactly you consider fake in an alt account, but I dont think its worth anyones time.
So why asking rhetorical questions when you claim not to be trolling? And that also answers your question about trolling. The whole issue is about preventing scams and you are trolling by some made-up law-defense circus, else what you managed now with this, apart from giving more hope to scammers?
Why? Because they questioned someone with power?
No, because for exactly what I have said before. For taking the time to create a FAKE ACCOUNT in order to open up this thread. I hope he also scams someone with it later when its not needed anymore - or better yet, sell it straight and hopefully it will get picked up by a scammer. Perhaps everyone should start creating 100 more new accounts daily. Youre not getting the point.
If you want to use a court as metaphor you probably have heard of witness protection. There is litterally a programm for people that are "too afraid to speak" otherwise. I dont see how this is a court though, its a discussion and community pressure on unpopular opinion is not unheard off.
Thats a joke, right? Perhaps you watched too many reruns of Sopranos. Now because its a "discussion" your fantasy law idea is in place? I said it once and I say again, you will get more and more scams because your idea to prevent scams is to give neg rep AFTER a scam.
Btw. You should ask a lawyer about your idea for a good laugh - im not kidding.
Its about preventing scams and your contribution is trolling (in my book, as you would say) - Make a poll among scammers about that.
