Author

Topic: [Poll] Tell me if you are who I think you are... (Read 2181 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
You also have to realize that this is the English section of the forum, if you ran the same poll in the [insert any other language] subsection of the forum you would probably get very different results.

I have some real doubts about it. What's the biggest non-English subforum? German? Don't expect too many people that fall out of the core category (I'm German myself, btw).

One thing is true: bitcoin seems to have some success in China. Assuming most Chinese forum member don't post in the English subforum, you're right, they're skewing the results quite a bit.

Ok, I realized that is true after I posted it, if you went to the German/Polish/Russian subforums you would get mostly white. But if you went to the Chinese subforum my guess is most would be non-white. I am not sure about Spanish, do Argentinians consider themselves white?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
You also have to realize that this is the English section of the forum, if you ran the same poll in the [insert any other language] subsection of the forum you would probably get very different results.

I have some real doubts about it. What's the biggest non-English subforum? German? Don't expect too many people that fall out of the core category (I'm German myself, btw).

One thing is true: bitcoin seems to have some success in China. Assuming most Chinese forum member don't post in the English subforum, you're right, they're skewing the results quite a bit.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
Not if the free market we have now stays as it is no Smiley you should also bear in mind this is an incredibly small poll of only 95 people which doesn't represent the population of the world or even the amount of people using Bitcoin, in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if there were just as many or maybe more women/ethnicities because of the pretty anonymous nature of Bitcoin. If everyone's only identity is an address then how can people judge them on their appearance or gender unless they reveal themselves?


You also have to realize that this is the English section of the forum, if you ran the same poll in the [insert any other language] subsection of the forum you would probably get very different results.

LOL that's just an example, I'd end up writing out the whole poll myself it I put in every ethnicity out there and for your information I'm half-Irish motherfucker Tongue

And what's your other half?

Are you trying to use Irish as an example of non-white?

I'm saying that it's incredibly ignorant to define people as white/black particularly as I'm an artist and understand the concept of there being more than two colours in the world, oh and I'm not colour blind. Tongue

And yes, I'm half-irish/half-english, there was actually a whole daily show segment on this kind of thing where politics and mainstream media loved to group everyone together in easily definable ways like hispanics or blacks or Europeans and there are many different groups in that group who hate each others guts.

So you are half-white and half-another shade of white. So you definitely fall under the "white" category.

Now, my nephews are half-white and half-Aztec, which category do they fit under? The answer is whichever category they identify themselves with.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Interesting poll. I would have guessed white male between 20-49 ofcourse dominant, but it seems very dominant, confirming we are still in very early adopter phase.

I am a white male 20 - 49 Sad
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
NSA information collection scheme?

Right. Cause if they are actually capable of doing what people think they are capable of doing, they'd need a poll for that kind of info.

That's probably what an NSA officer would say.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
NSA information collection scheme?

Right. Cause if they are actually capable of doing what people think they are capable of doing, they'd need a poll for that kind of info.
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
NSA information collection scheme?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
Im a little younger than 20 ::)

there's an option for that. But I guess my idea to randomize the order wasn't that smart after all :/
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Im a little younger than 20 Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
It isn't realistic, you have to realise as well there are some people who just don't care much about this sort of thing, in fact I'm betting that's how most people will feel, I always hear these dumb arguments from rights groups about how the leaders of various organisation etc. 'should' be hiring more of the group they're representing. How? If they aren't interested in doing the job then they're not going to do it well and you can't bloody well force them. This will be a pretty stereotypical example but imagine what one of those really girly stereotypical barbie style girls would say if they were suddenly told they'd should give up the work they prefer and go and work in a steel mill, they'd probably say "Go fuck yourself" or something along those lines.

The "barbie in a steel mill" example is such an oversimplification, it is not really useful in my opinion.

I'm not a huge fan of affirmative action/quotas/etc either, but I'm not entirely against them either.

The ultra-short version of my argument in favor of them would be: (a) for pretty much all throughout history, only men have been recipients of the highest level of education. it is naive to assume that 50 to 100 years after we've opened up the opportunities to everyone, the playing field is level already. (b) even assuming there are inherent differences that make guys more likely to become early adopters of technology, it could be in the best interest of all of society to correct for this -- only to a degree of course, otherwise you'll stifle natural competition too much in all likelihood.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
It isn't realistic, you have to realise as well there are some people who just don't care much about this sort of thing, in fact I'm betting that's how most people will feel, I always hear these dumb arguments from rights groups about how the leaders of various organisation etc. 'should' be hiring more of the group they're representing. How? If they aren't interested in doing the job then they're not going to do it well and you can't bloody well force them. This will be a pretty stereotypical example but imagine what one of those really girly stereotypical barbie style girls would say if they were suddenly told they'd should give up the work they prefer and go and work in a steel mill, they'd probably say "Go fuck yourself" or something along those lines.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
Not if the free market stays as it is no Smiley you should also bear in mind this is an incredibly small poll of only 95 people which doesn't represent the population of the world or even the amount of people using Bitcoin, in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if there were just as many or maybe more women/ethnicities because of the pretty anonymous nature of Bitcoin. If everyone's only identity is an address then how can people judge them on their appearance or gender unless they reveal themselves?

It's not about appearance or judgement, but the early adopter demographics, which consistently seems to be dominated by young guys, usually white with a few Asian guys in the mix.

It's been like that during the Internet boom, the dotcom bubble, and I suspect it'll be like that again during the early stages of bitcoin, i.e. now.

Sure, you can say, "what't the problem. us nerds are just quick to adopt new technologies", but I see several problems with this. (a) I personally think diversity/heterognity almost always beats homogenity, and (b) in 20 years from now, when bitcoin is fully accepted (let's say it is), we will probably have to somehow correct for this, similar to how we do now with quotas for female CEO/board members (in the EU) or affirmative action at universities ( in the US)

I think it would be kind of preferable if we could get some more people from outside the core group to join our little experiment now. But I admit, I don't think it's very realistic.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Not if the free market we have now stays as it is no Smiley you should also bear in mind this is an incredibly small poll of only 95 people which doesn't represent the population of the world or even the amount of people using Bitcoin, in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if there were just as many or maybe more women/ethnicities because of the pretty anonymous nature of Bitcoin. If everyone's only identity is an address then how can people judge them on their appearance or gender unless they reveal themselves?

Don't fall into the traps that the mainstream media use of thinking that percentages and polls of people in the mere thousands means shit.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
LOL that's just an example, I'd end up writing out the whole poll myself it I put in every ethnicity out there and for your information I'm half-Irish motherfucker Tongue

And what's your other half?

Are you trying to use Irish as an example of non-white?

I'm saying that it's incredibly ignorant to define people as white/black particularly as I'm an artist and understand the concept of there being more than two colours in the world, oh and I'm not colour blind. Tongue

And yes, I'm half-irish/half-english, there was actually a whole daily show segment on this kind of thing where politics and mainstream media loved to group everyone together in easily definable ways like hispanics or blacks or Europeans and there are many different groups in that group who hate each others guts.

Don't know if you're refering to my poll in particular, but I thought I already addressed that point. Yes, white vs. non-white is incredibly crude and simplifying, bordering on rudeness. At the same time, as this poll so far confirms, it is not without predictive/empirical power.

More precisely, from a, say, biologist's perspective, or that of an artist, white vs. non-white is probably dumb and meaningless. But in an economic context, it is de facto an important distinction. It's kind of sad that it is still a meaningful distinction, but don't blame the messenger for the message.

My entire question was about: who will hold power/wealth in the bitcoin future. Right now, it looks like it'll be predominantly white guys. Doesn't that make you at least the smallest worried or uncomfortable?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
The pool confused me aswell..
The pool makes me wet
Okay mister wet guy.
I meant the poll  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
The pool confused me aswell..
The pool makes me wet
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
LOL that's just an example, I'd end up writing out the whole poll myself it I put in every ethnicity out there and for your information I'm half-Irish motherfucker Tongue

And what's your other half?

Are you trying to use Irish as an example of non-white?

I'm saying that it's incredibly ignorant to define people as white/black particularly as I'm an artist and understand the concept of there being more than two colours in the world, oh and I'm not colour blind. Tongue

And yes, I'm half-irish/half-english, there was actually a whole daily show segment on this kind of thing where politics and mainstream media loved to group everyone together in easily definable ways like hispanics or blacks or Europeans and there are many different groups in that group who hate each others guts.
sr. member
Activity: 315
Merit: 250
The pool confused me aswell..
Me too I gave a wrong answer but I'm in the usual suspect group.

This make me wonder if the 10% of females is less or bigger in reality.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250

53 and white male. Which one do I click?

Do a lot of drugs in the disco era? Cheesy

I'm guessing this is your demo: white/male/<20, >49
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
The pool confused me aswell..

53 and white male. Which one do I click?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
I'm not really surprised; "white" is a blanket for so many different ethnicities, both western and eastern.  I picked non-white, since my mother's native, and I'm often mistaken for philippino, despite my 100% white Santa Clause father.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
The poll options are pretty self-explanatory, I guess:

8 combinations of ethnicity/gender/age range. (order sloppily randomized)

Please don't get too hung up about the, admittedly crude, distinctions like "white" vs. "non-white", or the binary gender choice, the format of this poll doesn't allow for much nuance.


Why am I asking those questions anyway, you might wonder. Because I believe that we are now still in the early stage of the history of bitcoin in which the wealth distribution is (largely) determined. This phase won't last forever, however. And if bitcoin is anywhere near as successful as many here think it is, bitcoin wealth distribution will eventually become general wealth distribution.

Maybe you can see why I would wonder then, what is the composition of our little group of early investors, speculators and adopters. I have a pretty big hunch what the result will look like, but I'm ready to be surprised.

Thanks for participating, by the way.
Here ya go, bro -- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/demographics-polling-hub-264649
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
The pool confused me aswell..
Me too I gave a wrong answer but I'm in the usual suspect group.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
The pool confused me aswell..
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
LOL that's just an example, I'd end up writing out the whole poll myself it I put in every ethnicity out there and for your information I'm half-Irish motherfucker Tongue

And what's your other half?

Are you trying to use Irish as an example of non-white?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
That poll confused me so much I clicked on the wrong option >_< organise it better!


It would be easier to read if they were not randomized. What is the point of randomizing the options?

The point is that there's an obvious answer (male, white, 20-49), but I didn't want the results skewed by the fact that I would order the options by their likely final ordering already.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
LOL that's just an example, I'd end up writing out the whole poll myself it I put in every ethnicity out there and for your information I'm half-Irish motherfucker Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 516
Merit: 283
That poll confused me so much I clicked on the wrong option >_< organise it better!

should be stuff like:

20 - 29 - White/Male

30 - 39 - White/Male

40 - 49 - White/Male

20 - 29 - White/Female

30 - 39 - White/Female

40 - 49 - White/Female


Oh no, my programming learning has started to infest my posts >_< now I need to correct other peoples formatting on top of their grammar and spelling! I'm a white male in the 20's by the way.



So, everyone who deals with btc is white? I didn't know the Bitcoin Foundation was just a chapter of the KKK....

Though, being as forgiving as I am, I'll consider it just a mistake that you forgot non-whites. Smiley
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
you're right I am a prostitute
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
That poll confused me so much I clicked on the wrong option >_< organise it better!


It would be easier to read if they were not randomized. What is the point of randomizing the options?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
That poll confused me so much I clicked on the wrong option >_< organise it better!

should be stuff like:

20 - 29 - White/Male

30 - 39 - White/Male

40 - 49 - White/Male

20 - 29 - White/Female

30 - 39 - White/Female

40 - 49 - White/Female


Oh no, my programming learning has started to infest my posts >_< now I need to correct other peoples formatting on top of their grammar and spelling! I'm a white male in the 20's by the way.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Interesting that for men there is a clear dominance of the 20-49 age range, but for women it is reversed.

hmmm ya, i wonder why that is....
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
Interesting that for men there is a clear dominance of the 20-49 age range, but for women it is reversed.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1094
Total 7 women, that's 10%, not bad. Unless some of them are fat guys living in their parents' basement.
If someone wonders why I have a teddy-bear as avatar, it's because I'm a bear and many women perceived me as a teddy-bear.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
Because of your avatar your probably asian female, under 20.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
Am I the only Indian guy here?!  Cool

Oh well, Indians are honorary whites anyway.


I'm kidding, I'm kidding!
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
their are 2 girls!  Cheesy

One of my eyes started bleeding when I read "their"
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
their are 2 girls!  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
Am I the only Indian guy here?!  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
This bull will try to shake you off. Hold tight!
Interesting poll. I would have guessed white male between 20-49 ofcourse dominant, but it seems very dominant, confirming we are still in very early adopter phase.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
The poll options are pretty self-explanatory, I guess:

8 combinations of ethnicity/gender/age range. (order sloppily randomized)

Please don't get too hung up about the, admittedly crude, distinctions like "white" vs. "non-white", or the binary gender choice, the format of this poll doesn't allow for much nuance.


Why am I asking those questions anyway, you might wonder. Because I believe that we are now still in the early stage of the history of bitcoin in which the wealth distribution is (largely) determined. This phase won't last forever, however. And if bitcoin is anywhere near as successful as many here think it is, bitcoin wealth distribution will eventually become general wealth distribution.

Maybe you can see why I would wonder then, what is the composition of our little group of early investors, speculators and adopters. I have a pretty big hunch what the result will look like, but I'm ready to be surprised.

Thanks for participating, by the way.
Jump to: