More detailed comparison chart in this article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/21/the-last-presidential-candidate-who-was-as-unpopular-as-donald-trump-david-duke/?postshare=9981458584946426&tid=ss_tw
It shows Hillary Clinton's unfavorable now are almost exactly the same at both George H.W. Bush's and Mitt Romney's unfavourables at the worst points in their respective campaigns. And it also shows that Donald Trump's are the highest of any candidate since 1984.
Interestingly, it does not show Ronald Reagan's highest unfavourables of the 1980 campaign. The article says that this polling series started in 1984, so there's no data from 1980 and earlier.
Topic: "Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings" (Read 278 times)
This latest CNN poll confirms what I've already guessed: the upcoming general election campaign is going to be the most brutal one in decades. Yep, the attack ads are going to be flyin', because:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/
----------
Might as well leave everyone hanging with that last sentence. Hmmm, "former President Bill Clinton, who in 1992 had a net negative rating of -17" was certainly hated by a lot of folks even when times were good and he was well-liked.
Quote
Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings
Washington (CNN)Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton register net negative ratings in double digits, indicating the front-runners for each party's presidential nominations are viewed negatively at historic levels, according to a new CBS/New York Times poll.
That makes Trump and Clinton viewed more unfavorably than any front-runner for either party since 1984, when CBS began polling voters on the question.
On the Republican side, Trump scores a net negative of -33, with a favorable rating of 24% compared to 57% of voters who view him unfavorably. On the Democratic side, Clinton fares only slightly better with a net negative of -21, registering a 31% favorable rating and a 52% unfavorable rating, according to the poll.
Both candidates' negatives far outweigh front-runners of the past. In 2012, President Barack Obama was viewed favorably and unfavorably by an equal share of voters, while Republican nominee Mitt Romney scored a net negative of -7. In 2008, both Obama and Sen. John McCain had net positive ratings of 16 and 7 points, respectively.
The previous highest unfavorable rating since 1984 actually belongs to another Clinton -- former President Bill Clinton, who in 1992 had a net negative rating of -17....
Washington (CNN)Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton register net negative ratings in double digits, indicating the front-runners for each party's presidential nominations are viewed negatively at historic levels, according to a new CBS/New York Times poll.
That makes Trump and Clinton viewed more unfavorably than any front-runner for either party since 1984, when CBS began polling voters on the question.
On the Republican side, Trump scores a net negative of -33, with a favorable rating of 24% compared to 57% of voters who view him unfavorably. On the Democratic side, Clinton fares only slightly better with a net negative of -21, registering a 31% favorable rating and a 52% unfavorable rating, according to the poll.
Both candidates' negatives far outweigh front-runners of the past. In 2012, President Barack Obama was viewed favorably and unfavorably by an equal share of voters, while Republican nominee Mitt Romney scored a net negative of -7. In 2008, both Obama and Sen. John McCain had net positive ratings of 16 and 7 points, respectively.
The previous highest unfavorable rating since 1984 actually belongs to another Clinton -- former President Bill Clinton, who in 1992 had a net negative rating of -17....
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/
----------
Might as well leave everyone hanging with that last sentence. Hmmm, "former President Bill Clinton, who in 1992 had a net negative rating of -17" was certainly hated by a lot of folks even when times were good and he was well-liked.
Jump to: