Topic: Poll:Scientific atheism Vs religious fanaticism (Read 1143 times)
It seems this forum is not faithful. All the atheists. I'm also a science and atheism. Do not understand adults who believe fairy tales.
Nobody knows that there even was a 65 million years ago. When you look at the basic scietific papers that suggest the age of the earth, the scientists, themselves, say that they don't know this for sure, and that the times set are simply to keep things coherent among the sciences.
Bible is record that was handed down through the ages, that the universe was created by God a little more than 6,000 years ago.
Bible is record that was handed down through the ages, that the universe was created by God a little more than 6,000 years ago.
There are plenty of evidences (read -> EVIDENCES) that the earth formed from the solar disk at least 4.5 BILLION years ago, along with the other planets of our solar system. And, talking about the dinosaurs... determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon is scientifically proven to be correct and reliable. And we know for sure that they existed since 250 million years ago and extincted 65 million years ago because of a 10km large asteroid that impacted the earth. Here we go again, there are plenty of PROOFS of such events... P R O O F S !!! Put down that shitty bible you read, and google for "Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Go learn something!
Otherwise, can you PROVE beyond any doubt that every scientist in the world is WRONG just because of some shit written in a stupid book called bible?!
PS: I know that, with your reply, you will amaze us with another ride on the bullshits rollercoaster!! I'm fastening my seat belt.
What do you want? Admitted guesswork by scientists? Or the record set down by God?
I never heard or read a scientist admitting guesswork about scientific proven facts... but we read lots of bullshits written by silly people like you, doing somersaults to hopelessly contradict scientific facts without posing any kind of proof.
PS: Which god, dude? There is no god! GOD DOESN'T EXISTS!
Stop trolling the forum, unless you aim to be the new exemplaar.
I think so too. But a lot of Muslims received a good education and should be smarter, but are in fact religious fanatics. Maybe it's not just in upbringing and education?
As far as I know among scientists40% religious, 50% atheists (data for Christianity and atheists in Eastern Europe)
but a fundamental difference between a believer scientist
and common believer people
that the scientist is almost never in a life guided by the law of God
believers scientists, likely can be attributed to the agnostics
Atheism all the way.
Religion is done. The internet killed it. It used to be so easy to deceive people with religion but it is over now. After 500 years or so, everybody will be laughing at us for believing such nonsense. like this:
from the year 2504; -wuuut they used to kill sheep to please god?? what a crap lol lol lol lmao. *today's average arab
Religion is done. The internet killed it. It used to be so easy to deceive people with religion but it is over now. After 500 years or so, everybody will be laughing at us for believing such nonsense. like this:
from the year 2504; -wuuut they used to kill sheep to please god?? what a crap lol lol lol lmao. *today's average arab
And I think that it is not a religion. Fanatics of course is evil. But is it only religious? And what football fans better? They also have some destruction.
immagine if those idiots in the middle east who got a sunstroke and started to see gods everywhere and voices saying the're ooh so special... and those jews.... yes they are linked into all this crap, abraham and jahwe everywhere...
immagine this, all this wasn't there, would we be already making babies on mars, the moon and beyound? prety sure we would.
immagine this, all this wasn't there, would we be already making babies on mars, the moon and beyound? prety sure we would.
I think so too. But a lot of Muslims received a good education and should be smarter, but are in fact religious fanatics. Maybe it's not just in upbringing and education?
Why get rid of them? They're not doing anything wrong. And religious dogma is taught good. We need to educate children so that they would not yield to the teaching of religion.
I mean religious fanaticsreligious fanatics, to impose their opinions adequate people
they can also commit violence against atheists and infidels
In general, I think, religiosity from poor education.
Quote
And religious dogma is taught good.
False, religion has done nothing good for the peoplesmost wars in history have been due to religious beliefs
As the asteroid caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago, religions will cause the extinction of the human beings, sooner or later. To avoid that risk we should get rid of those fanatic religious brainless morons! 
TrueNobody knows that there even was a 65 million years ago. When you look at the basic scietific papers that suggest the age of the earth, the scientists, themselves, say that they don't know this for sure, and that the times set are simply to keep things coherent among the sciences.
Bible is record that was handed down through the ages, that the universe was created by God a little more than 6,000 years ago.
What do you want? Admitted guesswork by scientists? Or the record set down by God?
Why get rid of them? They're not doing anything wrong. And religious dogma is taught good. We need to educate children so that they would not yield to the teaching of religion.
As the asteroid caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago, religions will cause the extinction of the human beings, sooner or later. To avoid that risk we should get rid of those fanatic religious brainless morons!
Scientfic atheism is harmless.
Religious fanaticism is dangerous, as some people get the sudden urge to kill other people for not joining or following the rules.
Religious fanaticism is dangerous, as some people get the sudden urge to kill other people for not joining or following the rules.
Check out this section, you will fit right in.. Politics & Society
PS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
PS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
I am glad that you support science. But which part do you support? Science theory, which is like the Easter bunny because it isn't factual science? Or science fact, which proves the existence of God through cause and effect - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
Check out this section, you will fit right in.. Politics & Society
PS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
I have already asked the moderatorsPS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
move topic in Politics & Society
Check out this section, you will fit right in.. Politics & Society
PS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
PS:
I support Science not the Easter bunny.
I am for scientific atheism.
I can write lot of pages about this and about why i think this way but in the end I think the picture below describes the best:
https://alittlebitleft.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/proofgodexists.jpg
Sure, I do believe in something but I for sure cannot name it GOD.
I can write lot of pages about this and about why i think this way but in the end I think the picture below describes the best:
https://alittlebitleft.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/proofgodexists.jpg
Sure, I do believe in something but I for sure cannot name it GOD.
Scientific atheism is ignorance or disregard of the fundamental science, cause and effect. See this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16703237 to see how science proves the existence of God beyond even the most tenuous shadow of a doubt.
I am for scientific atheism.
I can write lot of pages about this and about why i think this way but in the end I think the picture below describes the best:
Sure, I do believe in something but I for sure cannot name it GOD.
I can write lot of pages about this and about why i think this way but in the end I think the picture below describes the best:
Sure, I do believe in something but I for sure cannot name it GOD.
Science theory is the fanaticism. Why? Because many people believe theories are true, but nobody knows that they are true. This makes religion to have way more strength than science. How? Science has become religion through its theories being believed. Other religion is way more practical as religions than the science religion.
Religion rules!
Religion rules!
that made a religion for 300 years?
that made a science for 300 years?
created the alternating current generator
launched a man into space
computer
mobile telephone
TV
transfusion of blood and saving lives
double boiler and microwave oven
Internet
lamp
robotics
weapon
and much more
by the bye without computer would not have been created bitcoin
these people are in fact opposed to science
so they have to give up the telephone, computer, etc.
and go to live in a village without light and internet
people you want to go back to the 18th century?
that you choose?
scientific atheism or religious fanaticism?
that made a science for 300 years?
created the alternating current generator
launched a man into space
computer
mobile telephone
TV
transfusion of blood and saving lives
double boiler and microwave oven
Internet
lamp
robotics
weapon
and much more
by the bye without computer would not have been created bitcoin
these people are in fact opposed to science
so they have to give up the telephone, computer, etc.
and go to live in a village without light and internet
people you want to go back to the 18th century?
that you choose?
scientific atheism or religious fanaticism?
Jump to: