Author

Topic: PoolProfit.io: comparing profitability/fees of mining pools (Read 1006 times)

member
Activity: 109
Merit: 13
Yes add Kano... Nothing like this pool.  I have tried so many now for me there are only 2. Kano and Nicehash. Prohashing I like the concept but they have a lot of work to do to be stable
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Lulz - missing the pool that pays the best of them all - my pool KanoPool.

GBMiners sux - they get way too many orphans.
You ignored orphan rates that puts their return lower.
They don't know what they are doing with block submissions and have no expert on their team to deal with that - that's why they get so many orphans.

My fee has always been 0.9% since the beginning - long before GBMiners existed.
GBMiners simply copied my pool and all the software and made their fee the same.
They also removed my copyright from their web site that I wrote - yeah they're a bunch of thieving bastards - and thus not trustworthy.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Bosnia...
if I can understand the web page, the show top 30 or not?? what about other pools?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hey guys, there's a new website PoolProfit.io to help you easily compare profitability of the mining pools. The pool fees vastly differ and sometimes you have to dig really deep to actually find details about them. You also have to consider the amount of network fees and whether they are shared with miners. Currently top 12 pools by hashrate are included.

How it works? It takes real block data from blockchain from the last 30 days and apply pool fees on them. The result is net block reward - average reward from a block distributed amongst the miners. It doesn't differentiate between reward schemes, however if you do long term mining and don't often switch pools, the comparison should be pretty accurate. More info on the page.

Feedback appreciated.
Jump to: