While reading the article I always had the impression that a pure crypto-portfolio is the one to go away. Especially if newbies read the article it would be very helpful to point out that this is definitely not the case, but a crypto-portfolio is only part of a portfolio consisting of stocks, metals like gold, ... should be.
I have often had conversations with friends who said that they had diversified their portfolio a lot.
When you ask them about it, they said
- x percent in Bitcoin
- y percent in XRP
- z percent in high risk coins
I think it is very important to point out that in an investment portfolio, cryptocurrencies must be seen as a single "high risk" position and not all the money in the portfolio must be put into this single position because it is "high risk".
Of course I know that your article is not about overall portfolios and their composition, but I think a short note would be good, not that newcomers get the wrong impression
Apart from that I find the article really well balanced and very detailed, thanks!
