POS for altcoins? | Bitcointalksearch.org

mrnuts

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Aura on December 18, 2017, 02:21:56 PM

Lower popularity coins have a higher risk for 51% attacks then populair coins like Bitcoin. I personally believe that PoW is safer for 51% attacks than PoS as it's requires more to achieve 51% of the hash power compared to owning 51% of all circulating coins, especially for lower popularity coins. For example on coinmarketcap there at least a hundred coins that have a marketcap lower than 38 thousand, that means I can buy 51% of the circulating units for less than 1 bitcoin, if these coins would grow and I still own 51% then I'm capable of doing an 51% attack. While for a 51% attack using PoW I need to power enormous amounts of miners, probably not fitting in just one house. I think an attacker would rather buy 51% of all circulating units than powering multiple houses full with miners.

Yeah ,but then you're risking your stake... I mean if you own 51% the best way for you to profit is to support the coin, not to mess up with it... but instead for mining, if you own a mining pool with a lot of hash rate your only cost is the time redirect that hashing power over the coin, and that even if members of the pool realize what is happening...

Aura

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 268

Quote from: staywoke081 on December 18, 2017, 02:41:02 PM

Quote from: Aura on December 18, 2017, 02:21:56 PM

Lower popularity coins have a higher risk for 51% attacks then populair coins like Bitcoin. I personally believe that PoW is safer for 51% attacks than PoS as it's requires more to achieve 51% of the hash power compared to owning 51% of all circulating coins, especially for lower popularity coins. For example on coinmarketcap there at least a hundred coins that have a marketcap lower than 38 thousand, that means I can buy 51% of the circulating units for less than 1 bitcoin, if these coins would grow and I still own 51% then I'm capable of doing an 51% attack. While for a 51% attack using PoW I need to power enormous amounts of miners, probably not fitting in just one house. I think an attacker would rather buy 51% of all circulating units than powering multiple houses full with miners.

Yeah true but those are the lowest of the lowest coins on the rung. You can't say manipulate a hybrid coin like DeepOnion that easily or a coin like MUE that easily. Sure the smallest caps are easy to manipulate but if you have a decent cap you don't really need to worry about the 51% attack.

True, that's why both systems are immune for 51% attacks. However I still believe an attacker would rather own 51% of the circulating supply than having to power insane amounts of miners but that's just my personal opinion, as an attacker doesn't have to be one person it could also be a bank for example. A bank could easily miss 8 million if it would be necessary to keep them in business.

staywoke081

full member

Activity: 211

Merit: 100

Santa Coin

Quote from: Aura on December 18, 2017, 02:21:56 PM

Lower popularity coins have a higher risk for 51% attacks then populair coins like Bitcoin. I personally believe that PoW is safer for 51% attacks than PoS as it's requires more to achieve 51% of the hash power compared to owning 51% of all circulating coins, especially for lower popularity coins. For example on coinmarketcap there at least a hundred coins that have a marketcap lower than 38 thousand, that means I can buy 51% of the circulating units for less than 1 bitcoin, if these coins would grow and I still own 51% then I'm capable of doing an 51% attack. While for a 51% attack using PoW I need to power enormous amounts of miners, probably not fitting in just one house. I think an attacker would rather buy 51% of all circulating units than powering multiple houses full with miners.

Yeah true but those are the lowest of the lowest coins on the rung. You can't say manipulate a hybrid coin like DeepOnion that easily or a coin like MUE that easily. Sure the smallest caps are easy to manipulate but if you have a decent cap you don't really need to worry about the 51% attack.

Aura

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 268

Lower popularity coins have a higher risk for 51% attacks then populair coins like Bitcoin. I personally believe that PoW is safer for 51% attacks than PoS as it's requires more to achieve 51% of the hash power compared to owning 51% of all circulating coins, especially for lower popularity coins. For example on coinmarketcap there at least a hundred coins that have a marketcap lower than 38 thousand, that means I can buy 51% of the circulating units for less than 1 bitcoin, if these coins would grow and I still own 51% then I'm capable of doing an 51% attack. While for a 51% attack using PoW I need to power enormous amounts of miners, probably not fitting in just one house. I think an attacker would rather buy 51% of all circulating units than powering multiple houses full with miners.

mrnuts

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Well, one could argue that messing with POW coins it's easier since there are already established mine pools that could easyly achieve 51%... as a matter of fact it has already happened, so from that point of view i'd argue that the economic incentives to not mess up with a coin could be higher in POS...

Huh

Topic: POS for altcoins? (Read 116 times)