same story until they can prove with a signed message that they are satoshi, they ar enot satoshi, all the fuss about it are just for increasing notority for a stranger
Exactly!
Topic: possible effects of Satoshi revelation (if true) (Read 874 times)
It's funny to see how some people still assume Satoshi has a stash of around 1 million coins. There is absolutely no way of knowing how many coins he really has. Sure, I do believe the fact that he as first miner or one of the very first miners has managed to accumulate perhaps a few hundred thousand coins, but then again, so what? I find the fact that Mark Karpeles still has around 300,000-500,000BTC much more frightening than knowing the founder of Bitcoin has a good stash stored somewhere.
Exactly!
Exactly!
same story until they can prove with a signed message that they are satoshi, they are not satoshi, all the fuss about it are just for increasing notority for a stranger
It looks like the latest rumors are starting to affect the market. People getting scared that satoshi will dump.
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
Or you can look at the zionist banker shill Kwuckduck's post history and see every post is "Bitcoin is about to go to 0!" even when it's going up instead.
Would it hurt to stop straw manning me?
Your acct is useless now that everyone knows it was sold to banker shills to spam the forum. The propaganda you use is so bad, all I have to do is tell people to look at your post history and they instantly know to do the opposite of whatever you're spamming.
It looks like the latest rumors are starting to affect the market. People getting scared that satoshi will dump.
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
Or you can look at the zionist banker shill Kwuckduck's post history and see every post is "Bitcoin is about to go to 0!" even when it's going up instead.
Would it hurt to stop straw manning me?
It looks like the latest rumors are starting to affect the market. People getting scared that satoshi will dump.
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
Or you can look at the zionist banker shill Kwuckduck's post history and see every post is "Bitcoin is about to go to 0!" even when it's going up instead.
It looks like the latest rumors are starting to affect the market. People getting scared that satoshi will dump.
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
I can see that $400 breaking within the day. Yay panic!
No effects it's not him anyway. Extremely easy to prove.
but last issue about satoshi nakamoto (craig) make bitcoin price bull
i think each good and bad news make bitcoin price keep moving.
No effects it's not him anyway. Extremely easy to prove.
dont like this tension at all tbh
Why are all of your posts literally 3-4 words?
Nevermind...sig posters...
Then the sig poster below me seems to be speaking in some sort of caveman English. What is this?
because satoshi or to get a satoshi's data,even some people willa excited
dont like this tension at all tbh
Ultimately, it would depend on what Satoshi decides to do with his coins and how he does it. Although I doubt he would intentionally do something to seriously hurt the price of BTC. I can't see the announcement itself having any dramatic long-term effect though.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/mysterious-billionaire-inventor-bitcoin-could-7715752
the bottom line is that it was possibly three people, two are already dead and only one guy remains, Craig Wright, an Australian academic.
Not sure who they refer to as celebrated British mathematician.
American was described before, but I don't remember his last name exactly (Klurman?)
I think if C. Wright is the guy, bitcoin will take a 10-20% hit initially.
i am also not sure how relevant it is in the long run.
So, he has 1 mil coins, a lot, of course, but not the majority.
He is probably eager to sell them to banks or funds, slowly.
Not sure what the result would be.
Certainly, having no input into 6 years of development, how much influence he could bear?
the bottom line is that it was possibly three people, two are already dead and only one guy remains, Craig Wright, an Australian academic.
Quote
A source [might be J Matonis, who is specifically named at the end of the article] with close ties to the cryptograpy [sic!] community and telecoms industry told The Mirror that the story had already been sent to select media under an embargo which lifts this weekend.
Our source claimed: "The man behind Bitcoin has given the story to a television company and a newspaper.
"The creator of this currency wants to take control of his invention."
...
One of these men was purportedly a celebrated British mathematician who learned his trade as part of the World War II code-breaking team at Bletchley Park.
The other is an American tech security expert who died at a relatively young age just months before the British maths genius passed away himself.
However, these claims have proved highly controversial and remain unsubstantiated, so we have decided not to publish the two men's names.
Our source claimed: "The man behind Bitcoin has given the story to a television company and a newspaper.
"The creator of this currency wants to take control of his invention."
...
One of these men was purportedly a celebrated British mathematician who learned his trade as part of the World War II code-breaking team at Bletchley Park.
The other is an American tech security expert who died at a relatively young age just months before the British maths genius passed away himself.
However, these claims have proved highly controversial and remain unsubstantiated, so we have decided not to publish the two men's names.
Not sure who they refer to as celebrated British mathematician.
American was described before, but I don't remember his last name exactly (Klurman?)
I think if C. Wright is the guy, bitcoin will take a 10-20% hit initially.
i am also not sure how relevant it is in the long run.
So, he has 1 mil coins, a lot, of course, but not the majority.
He is probably eager to sell them to banks or funds, slowly.
Not sure what the result would be.
Certainly, having no input into 6 years of development, how much influence he could bear?
Jump to: